Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The purpose of this protocol is to define procedures and practices to be used by the PACT center for field testing of metal halide perovskite (MHP) photovoltaic (PV) modules. The protocol defines the physical, electrical, and analytical configuration of the tests and applies equally to mounting systems at a fixed orientation or sun tracking systems. While standards exist for outdoor testing of conventional PV modules, these do not anticipate the unique electrical behavior of perovskite cells. Further, the existing standards are oriented toward mature, relatively stable products with lifetimes that can be measured on the scale of years to decades. The state of the art for MHP modules is still immature with considerable sample to sample variation among nominally identical modules. Version 0.0 of this protocol does not define a minimum test duration, although the intent is for modules to be fielded for periods ranging for weeks to months. This protocol draws from relevant parts of existing standards, and where necessary includes modifications specific to the behavior of perovskites.

HyRAM+ is a toolkit that includes fast-running models for the unconstrained (i.e., no wall interactions) dispersion and flames for non-premixed fuels. The models were developed for use with hydrogen, but the toolkit was expanded to include propane and methane in a recent release. In this work we validate the dispersion and flame models for these additional fuels, based on reported literature data. The validation efforts spanned a range of release conditions, from subsonic to underexpanded jets and flames for a range of mass flow rates. In general, the dispersion model works well for both propane and methane although the width of the jet/plume is predicted to be wider than observed in some cases. The flame model tends to over-predict the induced buoyancy for low-momentum flames, while the radiative heat flux agrees with the experimental data reasonably well, for both fuels. The models could be improved but give acceptable predictions for propane and methane behavior for the purposes of risk assessment.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Deploying Tidal Energy Converters for electricity generation requires prior-knowledge of the potential Annual Energy Production (AEP) at the site, Ideally using a year-long tidal current record at the proposed site to minimize uncertainty. However, such records are often unavailable. Fortunately, using the periodic nature of tidal variability, the International Electrotechnical Commission Technical Specification for tidal energy resource assessment requires AEP calculation using at least 90 days of tidal current records at each turbine location. The sensitivity of AEP to different record durations has not been fully assessed. This is the goal of our study. The study utilized the U.S. tidal energy geodatabase to simulate tidal currents with various lengths, during 100 years of the 21st century. We then consider two frameworks for evaluating AEP: (a) The long-term (months) fixed instrument (FI) measurement at each proposed tidal turbine location, and (b) one FI measurement and short-term (hours) boat-based moving vessel measurements. Under the two scenarios, we examine the AEP assessed from short tidal current records, including how the AEP uncertainties vary spatially and temporally, and how they are associated with various astronomical factors. This helps provide guidance on choosing the appropriate assessment methodologies to reduce the AEP uncertainties and project cost.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Induced seismicity is an inherent risk associated with geologic carbon storage (GCS) in deep rock formations that could contain undetected faults prone to failure. Modeling-based risk assessment has been implemented to quantify the potential of injection-induced seismicity, but typically simplified multiscale geologic features or neglected multiphysics coupled mechanisms because of the uncertainty in field data and computational cost of field-scale simulations, which may limit the reliable prediction of seismic hazard caused by industrial-scale CO2 storage. The degree of lateral continuity of the stratigraphic interbedding below the reservoir and depth-dependent fault permeability can enhance or inhibit pore-pressure diffusion and corresponding poroelastic stressing along a basement fault. This study presents a rigorous modeling scheme with optimal geological and operational parameters needed to be considered in seismic monitoring and mitigation strategies for safe GCS.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Solving large number of small linear systems is increasingly becoming a bottleneck in computational science applications. While dense linear solvers for such systems have been studied before, batched sparse linear solvers are just starting to emerge. In this paper, we discuss algorithms for solving batched sparse linear systems and their implementation in the Kokkos Kernels library. The new algorithms are performance portable and map well to the hierarchical parallelism available in modern accelerator architectures. The sparse matrix vector product (SPMV) kernel is the main performance bottleneck of the Krylov solvers we implement in this work. The implementation of the batched SPMV and its performance are therefore discussed thoroughly in this paper. The implemented kernels are tested on different Central Processing Unit (CPU) and Graphic Processing Unit (GPU) architectures. We also develop batched Conjugate Gradient (CG) and batched Generalized Minimum Residual (GMRES) solvers using the batched SPMV. Our proposed solver was able to solve 20,000 sparse linear systems on V100 GPUs with a mean speedup of 76x and 924x compared to using a parallel sparse solver with a block diagonal system with all the small linear systems, and compared to solving the small systems one at a time, respectively. We see mean speedup of 0.51 compared to dense batched solver of cuSOLVER on V100, while using lot less memory. Thorough performance evaluation on three different architectures and analysis of the performance are presented.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.