Publications

Results 1–25 of 119

Search results

Jump to search filters

Hydrogen Plus Other Alternative Fuels Risk Assessment Models (HyRAM+) Technical Reference Manual (V.6.0)

Ehrhart, Brian D.; Hecht, Ethan S.; Devin, Michael C.; Groth, Katrina M.; Reynolds, John T.; Blaylock, Myra L.; Carrier, Erin E.; Schroeder, Benjamin B.

The HyRAM+ software is an open-source toolkit that provides publicly available models and default input values to enable straightforward and consistent safety assessments for hydrogen and other alternative fuel systems, such as natural gas and propane. The HyRAM+ quantitative risk assessment calculation incorporates annual likelihood of leaks or failures for both compressed gaseous and liquefied flammable fuels, as well as probabilistic models for the effects of heat flux and overpressure. HyRAM

More Details

Safety Review of the Hydrogen Components of a Reference Design of the Wind-H2-Green Steel/Ammonia Project

Louie, Melissa S.; Martens, Logan; Blaylock, Myra L.; Buttner, William; Ehrhart, Brian D.; Heo, Yeongae

The Department of Energy Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology Office and Wind Energy Technologies Office's Wind-H2-Green Steel/Ammonia project is an initiative to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of GW-scale integrated energy systems. The team designed reference facilities that utilize wind- and solar-produced hydrogen for industrial steel and ammonia production. This novel concept warranted review of safety codes and standards as they apply to the designs and the identification of codes and standards gaps. This report reviews hydrogen production and storage codes and standards using reference design specifications from a Minnesota steel plant. Requirements, recommendations, and exclusions for the system were identified. Observed gaps included non-specific salt cavern storage requirements, electrolyzer capacity beyond regulated ranges, and lack of requirements for iron reduction via hydrogen. This report will aide future project design efforts and may provide a basis for safety reviews in new designs for industrial facilities with hydrogen production integration.

More Details

Safety Review of the Hydrogen Components of a Reference Design of the Wind-H2-Green Steel/Ammonia Project

Louie, Melissa S.; Martens, Logan; Blaylock, Myra L.; Buttner, William; Ehrhart, Brian D.; Heo, Yeongae

The Department of Energy Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology Office and Wind Energy Technologies Office’s Wind-H2-Green Steel/Ammonia project is an initiative to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of GW-scale integrated energy systems. The team designed reference facilities that utilize wind- and solar-produced hydrogen for industrial steel and ammonia production. This novel concept warranted review of safety codes and standards as they apply to the designs and the identification of codes and standards as they apply to the designs and the identification of codes and standards gaps. This report reviews hydrogen production and storage codes and standards using reference design specifications from a Minnesota steel plant. Requirements, recommendations, and exclusions for the system were identified. Observed gaps included non-specific salt cavern storage requirements, electrolyzer capacity beyond regulated ranges, and lack of requirements for iron reduction via hydrogen. This report will aide future project design efforts and may provide a basis for safety reviews in new designs for industrial facilities with hydrogen production integration.

More Details

Heat transfer through a box beam from an impinging hydrogen flame

Blaylock, Myra L.; Schroeder, Benjamin B.; Lafleur, Chris; Bran Anleu, Gabriela A.

An analysis was performed to determine whether a hydrogen jet flame impinging on a tunnel ceiling composed of multiple prestressed steel reinforced concrete box beams could result in permanent damage to the tunnel. The lower layer of the concrete box beam was modeled to determine whether heat reaches the steel reinforcing bars and whether spalling could occur. Heat transfer analysis shows that the temperature remains constant at the location of the steel reinforcing bars after 1.3 minutes of impingement and reaches a maximum of 130°C after 5 minutes. However, assuming a constant impingement for 5 minutes is an over estimation due the existing fire model which includes conservative assumptions. Explosive spalling may occur at a thin layer (~0.05 in. at 50 seconds, 0.1 in. at 5 minutes) at the bottom surface of the concrete box beam, but the steel reinforcing bars will not be exposed to the hydrogen flame.

More Details

Heat Transfer Through a Passive Fire Protective Board from an Impinging Hydrogen Flame

Felipe, Christina; Blaylock, Myra L.; Lafleur, Chris; Bran Anleu, Gabriela A.

This report documents analysis to determine whether a hydrogen jet flame impinging on a tunnel ceiling structure could result in permanent damage to the Callahan tunnel in Boston, Massachusetts. This tunnel ceiling structure consists of a passive fire protective board supported by stainless steel hangers anchored to the tunnel ceiling with epoxy. Three types of fire protective boards were considered to determine whether heat from the flame could reach the stainless-steel hangers and the epoxy and cause the ceiling structure to collapse. Heat transfer analyses performed showed that the temperature remains constant where the steel hangers are attached to the passive fire protective board. According to these results, the passive fire protective board should provide adequate protection to the tunnel structure in this release scenario. Tunnel structures with similar suspended fire-resistant liner board materials should protect the integrity of the structure against the extremely low probability of an impinging hydrogen jet flame.

More Details

Physics model validation of propane and methane for Hydrogen Plus Other Alternative Fuels Risk Assessment Models (HyRAM+)

Process Safety and Environmental Protection

Guo, Qi; Hecht, Ethan S.; Blaylock, Myra L.; Shum, Jessica G.; Jordan, Cyrus

HyRAM+ is a toolkit that includes fast-running models for the unconstrained (i.e., no wall interactions) dispersion and flames for non-premixed fuels. The models were developed for use with hydrogen, but the toolkit was expanded to include propane and methane in a recent release. In this work we validate the dispersion and flame models for these additional fuels, based on reported literature data. The validation efforts spanned a range of release conditions, from subsonic to underexpanded jets and flames for a range of mass flow rates. In general, the dispersion model works well for both propane and methane although the width of the jet/plume is predicted to be wider than observed in some cases. The flame model tends to over-predict the induced buoyancy for low-momentum flames, while the radiative heat flux agrees with the experimental data reasonably well, for both fuels. The models could be improved but give acceptable predictions for propane and methane behavior for the purposes of risk assessment.

More Details

AWAKEN Wind Plant Simulation Comparison

Cheung, Lawrence; Hsieh, Alan S.K.; Blaylock, Myra L.; Herges, Thomas; Bays, Nathan R.; Brown, Kenneth A.; Sakievich, Philip; Houck, Daniel R.; Maniaci, David C.; Kaul, Colleen; Rai, Raj; Hamilton, Nicholas; Rybchuk, Alex; Scott, Ryan; Thedin, Regis; Radunz, William

A series of numerical simulations of wind farms, using different model fidelities and for different atmospheric stability conditions, were performed as a part of the American WAKE ExperimeNt. The simulations included using FLORIS wake models, a number of microscale AMR-Wind and Nalu-Wind runs, as well as idealized and complex terrain WRF runs. The largest computations used the AMR-Wind LES solver to simulate a 100 km x 100 km domain containing 541 turbines under unstable atmospheric conditions matching previous measurements, while other LES computations focused on sections of the King Plains wind farm. Results of this qualitative comparison illustrate the interactions with wind farms with large-scale ABL structures in the flow, as well as the extent of downstream wake penetration in the flow and blockage effects around wind farms.

More Details

Simulations for Planning of Liquid Hydrogen Spill Test

Energies

Blaylock, Myra L.; Hecht, Ethan S.; Mangala Gitushi, Kevin

In order to better understand the complex pooling and vaporization of a liquid hydrogen spill, Sandia National Laboratories is conducting a highly instrumented, controlled experiment inside their Shock Tube Facility. Simulations were run before the experiment to help with the planning of experimental conditions, including sensor placement and cross wind velocity. This paper describes the modeling used in this planning process and its main conclusions. Sierra Suite’s Fuego, an in-house computational fluid dynamics code, was used to simulate a RANS model of a liquid hydrogen spill with five crosswind velocities: 0.45, 0.89, 1.34, 1.79, and 2.24 m/s. Two pool sizes were considered: a diameter of 0.85 m and a diameter of 1.7. A grid resolution study was completed on the smaller pool size with a 1.34 m/s crosswind. A comparison of the length and height of the plume of flammable hydrogen vaporizing from the pool shows that the plume becomes longer and remains closer to the ground with increasing wind speed. The plume reaches the top of the facility only in the 0.45 m/s case. From these results, we concluded that it will be best for the spacing and location of the concentration sensors to be reconfigured for each wind speed during the experiment.

More Details

Investigations of Farm-to-Farm Interactions and Blockage Effects from AWAKEN Using Large-Scale Numerical Simulations

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Bays, Nathan R.; Blaylock, Myra L.; Herges, Thomas; Bays, Nathan R.; Brown, Kenneth A.; Sakievich, Philip; Houck, Daniel R.; Maniaci, David C.; Kaul, Collen; Rai, Raj; Hamilton, Nicholas; Rybchuk, Alex; Scott, Ryan; Thedin, Regis; Cheung, Lawrence

A large-scale numerical computation of five wind farms was performed as a part of the American WAKE experimeNt (AWAKEN). This high-fidelity computation used the ExaWind/AMR-Wind LES solver to simulate a 100 km × 100 km domain containing 541 turbines under unstable atmospheric conditions matching previous measurements. The turbines were represented by Joukowski and OpenFAST coupled actuator disk models. Results of this qualitative comparison illustrate the interactions of wind farms with large-scale ABL structures in the flow, as well as the extent of downstream wake penetration in the flow and blockage effects around wind farms.

More Details

Hydrogen Plus Other Alternative Fuels Risk Assessment Models (HyRAM+) Version 5.0 Technical Reference Manual

Ehrhart, Brian D.; Hecht, Ethan S.; Groth, Katrina M.; Reynolds, John T.; Blaylock, Myra L.; Carrier, Erin E.

The HyRAM+ software toolkit provides a basis for conducting quantitative risk assessment and consequence modeling for hydrogen, natural gas, and autogas systems. HyRAM+ is designed to facilitate the use of state-of-the-art models to conduct robust, repeatable assessments of safety, hazards, and risk. HyRAM+ integrates deterministic and probabilistic models for quantifying leak sizes and rates, predicting physical effects, characterizing hazards (thermal effects from jet fires, overpressure effects from delayed ignition), and assessing impacts on people. HyRAM+ is developed at Sandia National Laboratories to support the development and revision of national and international codes and standards, and to provide developed models in a publicly-accessible toolkit usable by all stakeholders. This document provides a description of the methodology and models contained in HyRAM+ version 5.0. The most significant change for HyRAM+ version 5.0 from HyRAM+ version 4.1 is the ability to model blends of different fuels. HyRAM+ was previously only suitable for use with hydrogen, methane, or propane, with users having the ability to use methane as a proxy for natural gas and propane as a proxy for autogas/liquefied petroleum gas. In version 5.0, real natural gas or autogas compositions can be modeled as the fuel, or even blends of natural gas with hydrogen. These blends can be used in the standalone physics models, but not yet in the quantitative risk assessment mode of HyRAM+.

More Details

Hydrogen Plus Other Alternative Fuels Risk Assessment Models (HyRAM+) Version 4.1 Technical Reference Manual

Ehrhart, Brian D.; Hecht, Ethan S.; Groth, Katrina M.; Reynolds, John T.; Blaylock, Myra L.; Carrier, Erin E.

The HyRAM+ software toolkit provides a basis for conducting quantitative risk assessment and consequence modeling for hydrogen, methane, and propane systems. HyRAM+ is designed to facilitate the use of state-of-the-art models to conduct robust, repeatable assessments of safety, hazards, and risk. HyRAM+ integrates deterministic and probabilistic models for quantifying accident scenarios, predicting physical effects, characterizing hazards (thermal effects from jet fires, overpressure effects from delayed ignition), and assessing impacts on people. HyRAM+ is developed at Sandia National Laboratories to support the development and revision of national and international codes and standards, and to provide developed models in a publicly-accessible toolkit usable by all stakeholders. This document provides a description of the methodology and models contained in HyRAM+ version 4.1. The two most significant changes for HyRAM+ version 4.1 from HyRAM+ version 4.0 are direct incorporation of unconfined overpressure into the QRA calculations and modification of the models for cryogenic liquid flow through an orifice. In QRA mode, the user no longer needs to input peak overpressure and impulse values that were calculated separately; rather, the unconfined overpressure is estimated for the given system inputs, leak size, and occupant location. The orifice flow model now solves for the maximum mass flux through the orifice at constant entropy while conserving energy, which does not require a direct speed of sound calculation. This does not affect the mass flow for all-gaseous releases; the method results in the same speed of sound for choked flow. However, this method does result in a higher (and more realistic) mass flow rate for a given leak size for liquid releases than was previously calculated.

More Details
Results 1–25 of 119
Results 1–25 of 119
Top