Austenitic stainless steels are used in high-pressure hydrogen containment infrastructure for their resistance to hydrogen embrittlement. Applications for the use of austenitic stainless steels include pressure vessels, tubing, piping, valves, fittings and other piping components. Despite their resistance to brittle behavior in the presence of hydrogen, austenitic stainless steels can exhibit degraded fracture performance. The mechanisms of hydrogen-assisted fracture, however, remain elusive, which has motivated continued research on these alloys. There are two principal approaches to evaluate the influence of gaseous hydrogen on mechanical properties: internal and external hydrogen, respectively. The austenite phase has high solubility and low diffusivity of hydrogen at room temperature, which enables introduction of hydrogen into the material through thermal precharging at elevated temperature and pressure; a condition referred to as internal hydrogen. H-precharged material can subsequently be tested in ambient conditions. Alternatively, mechanical testing can be performed while test coupons are immersed in gaseous hydrogen thereby evaluating the effects of external hydrogen on property degradation. The slow diffusivity of hydrogen in austenite at room temperature can often be a limiting factor in external hydrogen tests and may not properly characterize lower bound fracture behavior in components exposed to hydrogen for long time periods. In this study, the differences between internal and external hydrogen environments are evaluated in the context of fracture resistance measurements. Fracture testing was performed on two different forged austenitic stainless steel alloys (304L and XM-11) in three different environments: 1) non-charged and tested in gaseous hydrogen at pressure of 1,000 bar (external H2), 2) hydrogen precharged and tested in air (internal H), 3) hydrogen precharged and tested in 1,000 bar H2 (internal H + external H2). For all environments, elastic-plastic fracture measurements were conducted to establish J-R curves following the methods of ASTM E1820. Following fracture testing, fracture surfaces were examined to reveal predominant fracture mechanisms for the different conditions and to characterize differences (and similarities) in the macroscale fracture processes associated with these environmental conditions.
Austenitic stainless steels are the standard materials for containment of hydrogen and tritium because of their resistance to mechanical property degradation in those environments. The mechanical performance of the primary containment material is critical for tritium handling, processing, and storage, thus comprehensive understanding of the processes of tritium embrittlement is an enabling capability for fusion energy. This work describes the investigation of the effects of low levels of tritium-decay-helium ingrowth on 304 L tubes. Long-term aging with tritium leads to high helium contents in austenitic stainless steels and can reduce fracture toughness by 95 %, but the details of behavior at low helium contents are not as well characterized. Here, we present results from tensile testing of tritium pre-charged 304 L tube specimens with a variety of starting microstructures that all contain a low level of helium. The results of the tritium exposed-and-aged materials are compared to previously reported results on similar specimens tested in an unexposed condition as well as the hydrogen precharged condition. Tritium precharging and aging for a short duration resulted in increased yield strengths, ultimate tensile strengths and slightly increased elongation to failure, comparable to higher concentrations of hydrogen precharging.
Residual stress measurements using neutron diffraction and the contour method were performed on a valve housing made from 316 L stainless steel powder with intricate three-dimensional internal features using laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. The measurements captured the evolution of the residual stress fields from a state where the valve housing was attached to the base plate to a state where the housing was cut free from the base plate. Making use of this cut, thus making it a non-destructive measurement in this application, the contour method mapped the residual stress component normal to the cut plane (this stress field is completely relieved by cutting) over the whole cut plane, as well as the change in all stresses in the entire housing due to the cut. The non-destructive nature of the neutron diffraction measurements enabled measurements of residual stress at various points in the build prior to cutting and again after cutting. Good agreement was observed between the two measurement techniques, which showed large, tensile build-direction residual stresses in the outer regions of the housing. The contour results showed large changes in multiple stress components upon removal of the build from the base plate in two distinct regions: near the plane where the build was cut free from the base plate and near the internal features that act as stress concentrators. These observations should be useful in understanding the driving mechanisms for builds cracking near the base plate and to identify regions of concern for structural integrity. Neutron diffraction measurements were also used to show the shear stresses near the base plate were significantly lower than normal stresses, an important assumption for the contour method because of the asymmetric cut.
Additive manufacturing (AM) includes a diverse suite of innovative manufacturing processes for producing near-net shape components, typically from powder or wire feedstock. Reported mechanical properties of AM materials vary significantly depending on the details of the manufacturing process and the characteristics of the processing defects (namely, lack of fusion defects). However, an excellent combination of strength, ductility, and fracture resistance can be achieved in AM-type 304L and 316L austenitic stainless steels by minimizing processing defects. It is important to recognize that localized solidification processing during AM produces microstructures more analogous to weld microstructures than wrought microstructures. Consequently, the mechanical behavior of AM austenitic stainless steels in harsh environments can diverge from the performance of wrought materials. This report provides an overview of the fracture and fatigue response of type 304L materials from both directed energy deposition and powder bed fusion techniques. In particular, the mechanical performance of these materials is considered for high-pressure hydrogen applications by evaluating fatigue and fracture resistance after thermally precharging test specimens in high-pressure gaseous hydrogen. The mechanical behaviors are considered with respect to previous reports on hydrogen-assisted fracture of austenitic stainless steel welds and the unique characteristics of the AM microstructures. Fatigue crack growth can be relatively insensitive to processing defects, displaying similar behavior as wrought materials. In contrast, fracture resistance of dense AM austenitic stainless steel is more consistent with weld metal than with compositionally similar wrought materials. Hydrogen effects in the AM materials generally are more severe than in wrought materials but are comparable to measurements on welded austenitic stainless steels in hydrogen environments. Although hydrogen-assisted fracture manifests differently in welded and AM austenitic stainless steel, the fracture process appears to have a common origin in the compositional microsegregation intrinsic to solidification processes.
Austenitic stainless steels are used extensively in hydrogen gas containment components due to their known resilience in hydrogen environments. Depending on the conditions, degradation can occur in austenitic stainless steels but typically the materials retain sufficient mechanical properties within such extreme environments. In many hydrogen containment applications, it is necessary or advantageous to join components through welding as it ensures minimal gas leakage, unlike mechanical fittings that can become leak paths that develop over time. Over the years many studies have focused on the mechanical behavior of austenitic stainless steels in hydrogen environments and determined their properties to be sufficient for most applications. However, significantly less data have been generated on austenitic stainless steel welds, which can exhibit more degradation than the base material. In this paper, we assess the trends observed in austenitic stainless steel welds tested in hydrogen. Experiments of welds including tensile and fracture toughness testing are assessed and comparisons to behavior of base metals are discussed.
Additive manufacturing (AM) offers the potential for increased design flexibility in the low volume production of complex engineering components for hydrogen service. However the suitability of AM materials for such extreme service environments remains to be evaluated. This work examines the effects of internal and external hydrogen on AM type 304L austenitic stainless steels fabricated via directed-energy deposition (DED) and powder bed fusion (PBF) processes. Under ambient test conditions, AM materials with minimal manufacturing defects exhibit excellent combinations of tensile strength, tensile ductility, and fatigue resistance. To probe the effects of extreme hydrogen environments on the AM materials, tensile and fatigue tests were performed after thermalprecharging in high pressure gaseous hydrogen (internal H) or in high pressure gaseous hydrogen (external H). Hydrogen appears to have a comparable influence on the AM 304L as in wrought materials, although the micromechanisms of tensile fracture and fatigue crack growth appear distinct. Specifically, microstructural characterization implicates the unique solidification microstructure of AM materials in the propagation of cracks under conditions of tensile fracture with hydrogen. These results highlight the need to establish comprehensive microstructure-property relationships for AM materials to ensure their suitability for use in extreme hydrogen environments.
Austenitic stainless steels are used extensively in hydrogen gas containment components due to their known resilience in hydrogen environments. Depending on the conditions, degradation can occur in austenitic stainless steels but typically the materials retain sufficient mechanical properties within such extreme environments. In many hydrogen containment applications, it is necessary or advantageous to join components through welding as it ensures minimal gas leakage, unlike mechanical fittings that can become leak paths that develop over time. Over the years many studies have focused on the mechanical behavior of austenitic stainless steels in hydrogen environments and determined their properties to be sufficient for most applications. However, significantly less data have been generated on austenitic stainless steel welds, which can exhibit more degradation than the base material. In this paper, we assess the trends observed in austenitic stainless steel welds tested in hydrogen. Experiments of welds including tensile and fracture toughness testing are assessed and comparisons to behavior of base metals are discussed.
This SAND report fulfills the final report requirement for the Born Qualified Grand Challenge LDRD. Born Qualified was funded from FY16-FY18 with a total budget of ~$13M over the 3 years of funding. Overall 70+ staff, Post Docs, and students supported this project over its lifetime. The driver for Born Qualified was using Additive Manufacturing (AM) to change the qualification paradigm for low volume, high value, high consequence, complex parts that are common in high-risk industries such as ND, defense, energy, aerospace, and medical. AM offers the opportunity to transform design, manufacturing, and qualification with its unique capabilities. AM is a disruptive technology, allowing the capability to simultaneously create part and material while tightly controlling and monitoring the manufacturing process at the voxel level, with the inherent flexibility and agility in printing layer-by-layer. AM enables the possibility of measuring critical material and part parameters during manufacturing, thus changing the way we collect data, assess performance, and accept or qualify parts. It provides an opportunity to shift from the current iterative design-build-test qualification paradigm using traditional manufacturing processes to design-by-predictivity where requirements are addressed concurrently and rapidly. The new qualification paradigm driven by AM provides the opportunity to predict performance probabilistically, to optimally control the manufacturing process, and to implement accelerated cycles of learning. Exploiting these capabilities to realize a new uncertainty quantification-driven qualification that is rapid, flexible, and practical is the focus of this effort.