Publications

Results 76–100 of 119

Search results

Jump to search filters

Designing And Testing New MagLIF Preheat Protocols

Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Weis, Matthew R.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Glinsky, Michael E.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Awe, Thomas J.; Bliss, David E.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Harding, Eric H.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Kimmel, Mark W.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Lewis, Sean M.; Porter, John L.; Rambo, Patrick K.; Rochau, G.A.; Schollmeier, Marius; Schwarz, Jens S.; Shores, Jonathon S.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Smith, Ian C.; Speas, Christopher S.

Abstract not provided.

MagLIF laser preheat update

Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Weis, Matthew R.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Glinsky, Michael E.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Awe, Thomas J.; Bliss, David E.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Harding, Eric H.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Kimmel, Mark W.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Lewis, Sean M.; Schollmeier, Marius; Schwarz, Jens S.; Sefkow, Adam B.; Shores, Jonathon S.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Smith, Ian C.; Speas, Christopher S.; Wei, M.S.; Vesey, Roger A.; Porter, John L.

Abstract not provided.

Designing and testing new preheat protocols for MagLIF

Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Weis, Matthew R.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Glinsky, Michael E.; Awe, Thomas J.; Bliss, David E.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Harding, Eric H.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Kimmel, Mark W.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Lewis, Sean M.; Porter, John L.; Rochau, G.A.; Schollmeier, Marius; Schwarz, Jens S.; Shores, Jonathon S.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Smith, Ian C.; Speas, Christopher S.

Abstract not provided.

Uncovering signatures of preheat performance in MagLIF experiments using stimulated Raman and Brillouin backscatter spectra

Fein, Jeffrey R.; Bliss, David E.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Awe, Thomas J.; Ampleford, David A.; Glinsky, Michael E.; Laros, James H.; Harding, Eric H.; Macrunnels, K.A.; Patel, Sonal P.; Ruiz, Daniel E.; Scoglietti, Daniel S.; Smith, Ian C.; Weis, Matthew R.; Peterson, Kara J.

Abstract not provided.

Diagnosing and mitigating laser preheat induced mix in MagLIF

Physics of Plasmas

Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Weis, Matthew R.; Harding, Eric H.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Ampleford, David A.; Chandler, Gordon A.; Fein, Jeffrey R.; Glinsky, Michael E.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Hahn, K.D.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Paguio, R.R.; Perea, L.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Porter, John L.; Rambo, Patrick K.; Robertson, Grafton K.; Rochau, G.A.; Ruiz, Daniel E.; Schwarz, Jens S.; Shores, Jonathon S.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Smith, G.E.; Smith, Ian C.; Speas, Christopher S.; Whittemore, K.

A series of Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion (MagLIF) experiments have been conducted in order to investigate the mix introduced from various target surfaces during the laser preheat stage. The material mixing was measured spectroscopically for a variety of preheat protocols by employing mid-atomic number surface coatings applied to different regions of the MagLIF target. The data show that the material from the top cushion region of the target can be mixed into the fuel during preheat. For some preheat protocols, our experiments show that the laser-entrance-hole (LEH) foil used to contain the fuel can be transported into the fuel a significant fraction of the stagnation length and degrade the target performance. Preheat protocols using pulse shapes of a few-ns duration result in the observable LEH foil mix both with and without phase-plate beam smoothing. In order to reduce this material mixing, a new capability was developed to allow for a low energy (∼20 J) laser pre-pulse to be delivered early in time (-20 ns) before the main laser pulse (∼1.5 kJ). In experiments, this preheat protocol showed no indications of the LEH foil mix. The experimental results are broadly in agreement with pre-shot two-dimensional HYDRA simulations that helped motivate the development of the early pre-pulse capability.

More Details

Enhancing performance of magnetized liner inertial fusion at the Z facility

Physics of Plasmas

Slutz, Stephen A.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Harding, Eric H.; Hutsel, Brian T.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Awe, Thomas J.; Ampleford, David A.; Bliss, David E.; Chandler, Gordon A.; Cuneo, M.E.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Glinsky, Michael E.; Hahn, Kelly D.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Hess, Mark H.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Jones, Brent M.; Laity, George R.; Martin, Matthew; Peterson, Kyle J.; Porter, John L.; Rambo, Patrick K.; Rochau, G.A.; Rovang, Dean C.; Ruiz, Carlos L.; Savage, Mark E.; Schwarz, Jens S.; Schmit, Paul S.; Shipley, Gabriel A.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Smith, Ian C.; Stygar, William; Vesey, Roger A.; Weis, Matthew R.

The Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion concept (MagLIF) [Slutz et al., Phys. Plasmas 17, 056303 (2010)] is being studied on the Z facility at Sandia National Laboratories. Neutron yields greater than 1012 have been achieved with a drive current in the range of 17-18 MA and pure deuterium fuel [Gomez et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 155003 (2014)]. We show that 2D simulated yields are about twice the best yields obtained on Z and that a likely cause of this difference is the mix of material into the fuel. Mitigation strategies are presented. Previous numerical studies indicate that much larger yields (10-1000 MJ) should be possible with pulsed power machines producing larger drive currents (45-60 MA) than can be produced by the Z machine [Slutz et al., Phys. Plasmas 23, 022702 (2016)]. To test the accuracy of these 2D simulations, we present modifications to MagLIF experiments using the existing Z facility, for which 2D simulations predict a 100-fold enhancement of MagLIF fusion yields and considerable increases in burn temperatures. Experimental verification of these predictions would increase the credibility of predictions at higher drive currents.

More Details

The staged z-pinch as a potential high gain fusion energy source: An independent review, a negative conclusion

Physics of Plasmas

Lindemuth, Irvin R.; Weis, Matthew R.; Atchison, Walter L.

Previously published calculations predict that the "staged z-pinch" (SZP) can achieve 400 MJ of fusion yield on a Z-class machine. The SZP is touted to need no external preheat mechanism and no external pre-magnetization method. Instead, it is claimed that the imploding liner can adequately "shock preheat" the fuel and magnetic field diffusion through the liner can adequately magnetize the fuel. In this paper, we analyze a number of published SZP calculations and demonstrate that the calculations have major errors - the computer code used to do the calculations does not appear to be accurately solving the physical model it is intended to solve. A variety of independent analyses lead to this conclusion. This conclusion is confirmed by detailed one-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) calculations conducted on different computer codes using a variety of proposed SZP operating parameters. Although using parameters similar or identical to the published calculations, our MHD calculations do not reach fusion conditions; there is no conceivable modification of the parameters that would lead to high-gain fusion conditions using these other codes. Our analyses and a review of the magnetized target parameter space leads to further conclusion that the SZP should not be considered to be a potential high-gain fusion source.

More Details

Pushing Laser Pre-Heat in MagLIF

Geissel, Matthias G.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Fein, Jeffrey R.; Woodbury, Daniel W.; Davis, Daniel R.; Bliss, David E.; Scoglietti, Daniel S.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Ampleford, David A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Colombo, Anthony P.; Weis, Matthew R.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Glinsky, Michael E.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Ruiz, Daniel E.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Smith, Ian C.; Shores, Jonathon S.; Kimmel, Mark W.; Rambo, Patrick K.; Schwarz, Jens S.; Galloway, B.R.; Speas, Christopher S.; Porter, John L.

Abstract not provided.

Assessing Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion stagnation conditions and identifying trends

Gomez, Matthew R.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Hahn, Kelly D.; Harding, Eric H.; Ampleford, David A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Myers, Clayton E.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Rochau, G.A.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Weis, Matthew R.; Yager-Elorriaga, David A.

Abstract not provided.

Assessing stagnation magnetized liner inertial fusion stagnation conditions and identifying trends

Gomez, Matthew R.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Hahn, Kelly D.; Harding, Eric H.; Ampleford, David A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Myers, Clayton E.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Rochau, G.A.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Weis, Matthew R.; Yager-Elorriaga, David A.

Abstract not provided.

A Window-less Target for Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion Characterized using High-Speed Solid-State Framing Cameras

Colombo, Anthony P.; Schwarz, Jens S.; Rambo, Patrick K.; Galloway, B.R.; Kimmel, Mark W.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Weis, Matthew R.; Claus, Liam D.; England, Troy D.; Fang, Lu F.; Looker, Quinn M.; Mitchell, Brandon M.; Montoya, Andrew M.; Robertson, Gideon R.; Rochau, G.A.; Sanchez, Marcos O.; Stahoviak, John W.; Hund, Jared; Sin, Justin; Porter, John L.

Abstract not provided.

MagLIFEP and MagLIFSNL

Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Wei, Mingsheng; Glinsky, Michael E.; Weis, Matthew R.; Nagayama, Taisuke N.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Fooks, J.; Giraldez, E.; Krauland, C.; Campbell, M.; Davies, J.; Peebles, J.; Bahr, R.; Edgell, D.; Stoeckl, C.; Turnbull, D.; Glebov, V.; Emig, J.; Heeter, R.; Strozzi, D.

The MagLIF campaign operated by Sandia conducted a total of four shot days in FY17 (one on OMEGA and three on OMEGA-EP) aimed at characterizing the laser heating of underdense plasmas (D2, Ar) at parameters that are relevant to the Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion (MagLIF) ICF scheme being pursued at Sandia National Laboratories [1] [2]. MagLIF combines fuel preheat, magnetization and pulsed power implosion to significantly relax the implosion velocity and pR required for self-heating. Effective fuel preheat requires coupling several kJ of laser energy into the 10 mm long, underdense (typically ne/nc<0.1) fusion fuel without introducing significant mix. Barriers to achieving this include the presence laser plasma instabilities (LPI) as laser energy is coupled to the initially cold fuel, and the presence of a thin, polyimide laser entrance hole (LEH) foil that the laser must pass through and that can be a significant perturbation.

More Details

Minimizing scatter-losses during pre-heat for magneto-inertial fusion targets

Physics of Plasmas

Geissel, Matthias G.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Awe, Thomas J.; Bliss, David E.; Glinsky, Michael E.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Harding, Eric H.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Speas, Christopher S.; Kimmel, Mark W.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Lewis, Sean M.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Schollmeier, Marius; Schwarz, Jens S.; Shores, Jonathon S.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Smith, Ian C.; Vesey, Roger A.; Weis, Matthew R.; Porter, John L.

The size, temporal and spatial shape, and energy content of a laser pulse for the pre-heat phase of magneto-inertial fusion affect the ability to penetrate the window of the laser-entrance-hole and to heat the fuel behind it. High laser intensities and dense targets are subject to laser-plasma-instabilities (LPI), which can lead to an effective loss of pre-heat energy or to pronounced heating of areas that should stay unexposed. While this problem has been the subject of many studies over the last decades, the investigated parameters were typically geared towards traditional laser driven Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) with densities either at 10% and above or at 1% and below the laser's critical density, electron temperatures of 3-5 keV, and laser powers near (or in excess of) 1 × 1015 W/cm2. In contrast, Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion (MagLIF) [Slutz et al., Phys. Plasmas 17, 056303 (2010) and Slutz and Vesey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 025003 (2012)] currently operates at 5% of the laser's critical density using much thicker windows (1.5-3.5 μm) than the sub-micron thick windows of traditional ICF hohlraum targets. This article describes the Pecos target area at Sandia National Laboratories using the Z-Beamlet Laser Facility [Rambo et al., Appl. Opt. 44(12), 2421 (2005)] as a platform to study laser induced pre-heat for magneto-inertial fusion targets, and the related progress for Sandia's MagLIF program. Forward and backward scattered light were measured and minimized at larger spatial scales with lower densities, temperatures, and powers compared to LPI studies available in literature.

More Details

Stagnation Morphology in Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion Experiments

Gomez, Matthew R.; Harding, Eric H.; Ampleford, David A.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Chandler, Gordon A.; Glinsky, Michael E.; Hahn, Kelly D.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Jones, Brent M.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Martin, Matthew; Peterson, Kyle J.; Rochau, G.A.; Ruiz, Carlos L.; Schmit, Paul S.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Weis, Matthew R.; Yu, Edmund Y.

Abstract not provided.

Pre-Heat Optimization for Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion at Sandia

Geissel, Matthias G.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Awe, Thomas J.; Bliss, David E.; Glinsky, Michael E.; Gomez, Matthew R.; Harding, Eric H.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Kimmel, Mark W.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Lewis, Sean M.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Schollmeier, Marius; Shores, Jonathon S.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Smith, Ian C.; Speas, Christopher S.; Vesey, Roger A.; Weis, Matthew R.; Porter, John L.

Abstract not provided.

Results 76–100 of 119
Results 76–100 of 119