Impact ionization coefficients play a critical role in semiconductors. In addition to silicon, silicon carbide and gallium nitride are important semiconductors that are being seen more as mainstream semiconductor technologies. As a reflection of the maturity of these semiconductors, predictive modeling has become essential to device and circuit designers, and impact ionization coefficients play a key role here. Recently, several studies have measured impact ionization coefficients. We dedicated the first part of our study to comparing three experimental methods to estimate impact ionization coefficients in GaN, which are all based on photomultiplication but feature characteristic differences. The first method inserts an InGaN hole-injection layer, the accuracy of which is challenged by the dominance of ionization in InGaN, leading to possible overestimation of the coefficients. The second method utilizes the Franz-Keldysh effect for hole injection but not for electrons, where the mixed injection of induced carriers would require a margin of error. The third method uses complementary p-n and n-p structures that have been at the basis of this estimation in Si and SiC and leans on the assumption of a constant electric field, and any deviation would require a margin of error. In the second part of our study, we evaluated the models using recent experimental data from diodes demonstrating avalanche breakdown.
Understanding of semiconductor breakdown under high electric fields is an important aspect of materials’ properties, particularly for the design of power devices. For decades, a power-law has been used to describe the dependence of material-specific critical electrical field (Ecrit) at which the material breaks down and bandgap (Eg). The relationship is often used to gauge tradeoffs of emerging materials whose properties haven’t yet been determined. Unfortunately, the reported dependencies of Ecrit on Eg cover a surprisingly wide range in the literature. Moreover, Ecrit is a function of material doping. Further, discrepancies arise in Ecrit values owing to differences between punch-through and non-punch-through device structures. We report a new normalization procedure that enables comparison of critical electric field values across materials, doping, and different device types. An extensive examination of numerous references reveals that the dependence Ecrit ∝ Eg1.83 best fits the most reliable and newest data for both direct and indirect semiconductors. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
Deep level defects in wide bandgap semiconductors, whose response times are in the range of power converter switching times, can have a significant effect on converter efficiency. We use deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) to evaluate such defect levels in the n-drift layer of vertical gallium nitride (v-GaN) power diodes with VBD ∼1500 V. DLTS reveals three energy levels that are at ∼0.6 eV (highest density), ∼0.27 eV (lowest density), and ∼45 meV (a dopant level) from the conduction band. Dopant extraction from capacitance-voltage measurement tests (C-V) at multiple temperatures enables trap density evaluation, and the ∼0.6 eV trap has a density of 1.2 × 1015 cm-3. The 0.6 eV energy level and its density are similar to a defect that is known to cause current collapse in GaN based surface conducting devices (like high electron mobility transistors). Analysis of reverse bias currents over temperature in the v-GaN diodes indicates a predominant role of the same defect in determining reverse leakage current at high temperatures, reducing switching efficiency.
This work investigates both avalanche behavior and failure mechanism of 3 kV GaN-on-GaN vertical P-N diodes, that were fabricated and later tested under unclamped inductive switching (UIS) stress. The goal of this study is to use the particular avalanche characteristics and the failure mechanism to identify issues with the field termination and then provide feedback to improve the device design. DC breakdown is measured at the different temperatures to confirm the avalanche breakdown. Diode's avalanche robustness is measured on-wafer using a UIS test set-up which was integrated with a wafer chuck and CCD camera. Post failure analysis of the diode is done using SEM and optical microscopy to gain insight into the device failure physics.
In order to evaluate the time evolution of avalanche breakdown in wide and ultra-wide bandgap devices, we have developed a cable pulser experimental setup that can evaluate the time-evolution of the terminating impedance for a semiconductor device with a time resolution of 130 ps. We have utilized this pulser setup to evaluate the time-to-breakdown of vertical Gallium Nitride and Silicon Carbide diodes for possible use as protection elements in the electrical grid against fast transient voltage pulses (such as those induced by an electromagnetic pulse event). We have found that the Gallium Nitride device demonstrated faster dynamics compared to the Silicon Carbide device, achieving 90% conduction within 1.37 ns compared to the SiC device response time of 2.98 ns. While the Gallium Nitride device did not demonstrate significant dependence of breakdown time with applied voltage, the Silicon Carbide device breakdown time was strongly dependent on applied voltage, ranging from a value of 2.97 ns at 1.33 kV to 0.78 ns at 2.6 kV. The fast response time (< 5 ns) of both the Gallium Nitride and Silicon Carbide devices indicate that both materials systems could meet the stringent response time requirements and may be appropriate for implementation as protection elements against electromagnetic pulse transients.
Wong, Man H.; Bierwagen, Oliver; Kaplar, Robert J.; Umezawa, Hitoshi
Ultrawide-bandgap (UWBG) semiconductor technology is presently going through a renaissance exemplified by advances in material-level understanding, extensions of known concepts to new materials, novel device concepts, and new applications. This focus issue presents a timely selection of papers spanning the current state of the art in UWBG materials and applications, including both experimental results and theoretical developments. It covers broad research subtopics on UWBG bulk crystals and substrate technologies, UWBG defect science and doping, UWBG epitaxy, UWBG electronic and optoelectronic properties, and UWBG power devices and emitters. In this overview article, we consolidate the fundamentals and background of key UWBG semiconductors including aluminum gallium nitride alloys (AlxGa1–xN), boron nitride (BN), diamond, β-phase gallium oxide (β-Ga2O3), and a number of other UWBG binary and ternary oxides. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
