Publications

Results 26–37 of 37

Search results

Jump to search filters

Accelerated Testing of Selected Filler Compositions

Rigali, Mark J.; Phillips, Mark; Lindgren, Eric; Burton, Patrick D.; Basurto, Eduardo

The fillers R&D program, mostly experimental, is part of a broader R&D program that includes new process modeling and performance assessment of criticality effects and the overall importance of criticality to repository performance (consequence screening). A literature research and consultation effort with experts by Hardin and Brady (2018) identified several potentially effective and workable filler materials including cements (primarily phosphate based), molten-metal alloys, and low-temperature glasses. Filler attributes were defined and the preliminary lists were compared qualitatively. Further comparative analysis will be done (e.g., cost estimates) after experimental screening has narrowed the list of alternatives. The following cement filler compositions were selected for experimental development work and accelerated testing in FY19: Aluminum phosphate cements (APCs); more specifically aluminum oxide / aluminum phosphate (Al2O3/ AlPO4) cements in which Al2O3 serves as the filler material bound by an AlPO4 binder formed by the reaction of Al2O3 with H3PO4; Calcium phosphate cements (CPCs); more specifically composed of pure or nearly pure hydroxyapatite (Ca5(PO4)3(OH)); Magnesium potassium phosphate cements (MKPs) composed of magnesium oxide / magnesium potassium phosphate (MgO / MgKPO4) cements in which MgO serves as the filler and MgKPO4 serves as the binder formed by the reaction of MgO with monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4) and tricalcium phosphate ((Ca3(PO4)2); Two additional potential cement materials were explored preliminarily as the result of: (1) continued literature investigations into other filler candidates (wollastonite-based phosphate ceramic) and (2) the experimental discovery of a well-consolidated fly ash phosphate cement during the evaluation of fly ash as a potential filler material with Al2O3in APCs. Fly ash phosphate cements, more specifically in which a fly ash material composed primarily of mullite and quartz serves as the filler and is reacted with H3PO4 to form amorphous phosphate phase(s) as the binder; Wollastonite aluminum phosphate cements (WAPC), specifically wollastonite / aluminum phosphate (CaSiO3/ AlPO4) in which CaSiO3 serves as the filler material and AlPO4 serves as the binder formed by Al(OH)3 or metakaolin as Al sources and H3PO4 or ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (ADP) (NH4H2PO4) as phosphate sources. The FY19 effort focused on the optimization of compositions and subsequent processing of these five materials to achieve dense and well-consolidated monolithic samples with relatively low porosity. Once these goals were met basic material properties screening evaluations were performed including an assessment of dissolution resistance in water at elevated temperature (200 °C) and mechanical testing including unconfined compressive strength (UCS) testing. To date, the aluminum phosphate cements (APCs) appear to show the most promise for continued development. They are easily prepared and form smooth pourable slurries that remain stable for days with relatively low viscosities of several thousand centipoise (cP). They are then set at elevated temperatures (e.g., 170 °C) under ambient (0.1 MPa) or elevated pressure (~1MPa). Overall, they demonstrate the best dissolution resistance in water at elevated temperature (200 °C) and good compressive strengths. However, additional effort is required to optimize the APC slurry formulations and the process used for thermal curing these materials. The calcium phosphate cements (CPCs) can be formed at room temperature to produce a well-consolidated body. However, their slurry viscosities are very high (and difficult to measure) and they exhibit relatively short cure times of 2 to 3 hours. Also, dissolution resistance is very poor, the poorest of all the cements examined The same is the case for the small number of MKP cements fabricated; they cure very quickly (10 minutes or less) and disintegrate within a few hours upon immersion in distilled water. Surprisingly, fly ash reacts with phosphoric acid to form dense and well-consolidated cements but the mixture rapidly sets at room temperature (less than 30 minutes) and the subsequent conversion of the binder to an amorphous phosphate phase(s) as a function of temperature is complicated. Finally, the wollastonite aluminum phosphate cements (WAPC) are easily prepared and form smooth pourable slurries that remain stable for several hours. They are then set at 130 °C. A WAPC sample exhibited the highest compressive strengths of all the materials we evaluated but in general their dissolution resistance to water is poor.

More Details

Advances in Geologic Disposal Safety Assessment and an Unsaturated Alluvium Reference Case

Mariner, Paul; Stein, Emily; Cunningham, Leigh; Frederick, Jennifer M.; Hammond, Glenn E.; Lowry, Thomas S.; Basurto, Eduardo

The Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology (SFWST) Campaign of the U.S. Depat ment of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology (OFCT) is conducting research and development (R&D) on geologic disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high level nuclear waste (HLW). Two high priorities for SFWST disposal R&D are design concept development and disposal system modeling (DOE 2011, Table 6). These priorities are directly addressed in the SFWST Geologic Disposal Safety Assessment (GDSA) work package, which is charged with developing a disposal system modeling and analysis capability for evaluating disposal system performance for nuclear waste in geologic media. This report describes specific GDSA activities in fiscal year 2018 (FY 2018) toward the development of GDSA Framework, an enhanced disposal system modeling and analysis capability for geologic disposal of nuclear waste. GDSA Framework employs the PFLOTRAN thermal-hydrologic-chemical multiphysics code (Hammond et al. 2011a; Lichtner and Hammond 2012) and the Dakota uncertainty sampling and propagation code (Adams et al. 2012; Adams et al. 2013). Each code is designed for massivelyparallel processing in a high-performance computing (HPC) environment. Multi-physics representations in PFLOTRAN are used to simulate various coupled processes including heat flow, fluid flow, waste dissolution, radionuclide release, radionuclide decay and ingrowth, precipitation and dissolution of secondary phases, and radionuclide transport through engineered barriers and natural geologic barriers to the biosphere. Dakota is used to generate sets of representative realizations and to analyze parameter sensitivity.

More Details

US Sections Prepared for Future NEA Crystalline Club (CRC) Report on Status of R&D in CRC Countries Investigating Deep Geologic Disposal in Crystalline Rock

Mariner, Paul; Stein, Emily; Kalinina, Elena A.; Hadgu, Teklu; Jove-Colon, Carlos F.; Basurto, Eduardo

U.S. knowledge in deep geologic disposal in crystalline rock is advanced and growing. U.S. status and recent advances related to crystalline rock are discussed throughout this report. Brief discussions of the history of U.S. disposal R&D and the accumulating U.S. waste inventory are presented in Sections 3.x.2 and 3.x.3. The U.S. repository concept for crystalline rock is presented in Section 3.x.4. In Chapters 4 and 5, relevant U.S. research related to site characterization and repository safety functions are discussed. U.S. capabilities for modelling fractured crystalline rock and performing probabilistic total system performance assessments are presented in Chapter 6.

More Details
Results 26–37 of 37
Results 26–37 of 37