Publications

Results 1–25 of 111

Search results

Jump to search filters

One dimensional imager of neutrons on the Z machine

Review of Scientific Instruments

Ampleford, David A.; Ruiz, Carlos L.; Fittinghoff, David N.; Vaughan, Jeremy V.; Hahn, Kelly D.; Lahmann, Brandon; Gatu-Johnson, Maria; Frenje, Johan; Petrasso, Richard; Ball, Christopher R.; Maurer, A.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Fisher, John A.; Alberto, Perry; Torres, Jose A.; Jones, Brent M.; Rochau, G.A.; May, Mark J.

We recently developed a one-dimensional imager of neutrons on the Z facility. The instrument is designed for Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion (MagLIF) experiments, which produce D-D neutrons yields of ∼3 × 1012. X-ray imaging indicates that the MagLIF stagnation region is a 10-mm long, ∼100-μm diameter column. The small radial extents and present yields precluded useful radial resolution, so a one-dimensional imager was developed. The imaging component is a 100-mm thick tungsten slit; a rolled-edge slit limits variations in the acceptance angle along the source. CR39 was chosen as a detector due to its negligible sensitivity to the bright x-ray environment in Z. A layer of high density poly-ethylene is used to enhance the sensitivity of CR39. We present data from fielding the instrument on Z, demonstrating reliable imaging and track densities consistent with diagnosed yields. For yields ∼3 × 1012, we obtain resolutions of ∼500 μm.

More Details

Assessing Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion stagnation conditions and identifying trends

Gomez, Matthew R.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Hahn, Kelly D.; Harding, Eric H.; Ampleford, David A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Myers, Clayton E.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Rochau, G.A.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Weis, Matthew R.; Yager-Elorriaga, David A.

Abstract not provided.

Assessing stagnation magnetized liner inertial fusion stagnation conditions and identifying trends

Gomez, Matthew R.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Hahn, Kelly D.; Harding, Eric H.; Ampleford, David A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Myers, Clayton E.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Rochau, G.A.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Weis, Matthew R.; Yager-Elorriaga, David A.

Abstract not provided.

Rigorous uncertainty propagation using a dosimetry transfer calibration

ASTM Special Technical Publication

Griffin, Patrick J.; Vehar, David W.; Parma, Edward J.; Hahn, Kelly D.

The process of determining the uncertainty in the neutron fluence from the measured activity of a dosimetry monitor is reviewed and the importance of treating the energy-dependent correlation is illustrated using several representative neutron fields. The process of determining the uncertainty in the neutron fluence when a transfer calibration is used is then detailed. The conversion factor, when a transfer calibration is used, has a term that has an integral over the cross section appearing in both the numerator and the denominator. This term introduces a nonlinear dependence on the cross section within the conversion factor and an explicit correlation between the terms appearing in the numerator and denominator of the conversion factor. A method for rigorously treating this nonlinear uncertainty propagation is presented. This method is based upon utilizing the covariance matrix for the cross section and utilizing a statistical sampling approach based on a Cholesky transformation of this covariance matrix. This methodology is then applied to the determination of the uncertainty from a transfer calibration for a set of nine neutron spectra based upon using the 32S(n,p)32P reaction and a transfer calibration in a 2 5 2Cf standard benchmark neutron field. A very strong correlation is found in the cross-section terms as they appear in the numerator and in the denominator. When a rigorous treatment is used to propagate the uncertainty due to the cross section for the dosimetry monitor, the uncertainty in the conversion factor is reduced by a factor of more than ten times from a worst-case approach that treats the uncertainty components in the numerator and denominator as uncorrelated. This ten times difference is also seen when the comparison is made between a rigorous treatment and a treatment of the cross-section contributions where the numerator and denominator are treated as uncorrelated (i.e., when compared to a root-mean-square approach).

More Details

Stagnation Morphology in Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion Experiments

Gomez, Matthew R.; Harding, Eric H.; Ampleford, David A.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Chandler, Gordon A.; Glinsky, Michael E.; Hahn, Kelly D.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Jones, Brent M.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Martin, Matthew; Peterson, Kyle J.; Rochau, G.A.; Ruiz, Carlos L.; Schmit, Paul S.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Weis, Matthew R.; Yu, Edmund Y.

Abstract not provided.

A Path to Increased Performance in Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion

Gomez, Matthew R.; Slutz, Stephen A.; Jennings, Christopher A.; Harvey-Thompson, Adam J.; Weis, Matthew R.; Lamppa, Derek C.; Hutsel, Brian T.; Ampleford, David A.; Awe, Thomas J.; Bliss, David E.; Chandler, Gordon A.; Geissel, Matthias G.; Hahn, Kelly D.; Hansen, Stephanie B.; Harding, Eric H.; Hess, Mark H.; Knapp, Patrick K.; Laity, George R.; Martin, Matthew; Nagayama, Taisuke N.; Rovang, Dean C.; Ruiz, Carlos L.; Savage, Mark E.; Schmit, Paul S.; Schwarz, Jens S.; Smith, Ian C.; Vesey, Roger A.; Yu, Edmund Y.; Cuneo, M.E.; Jones, Brent M.; Peterson, Kyle J.; Porter, John L.; Rochau, G.A.; Sinars, Daniel S.; Stygar, William A.

Abstract not provided.

Results 1–25 of 111
Results 1–25 of 111