Optimization-based Design for Manufacturing
This report provides detailed documentation of the algorithms that where developed and implemented in the Plato software over the course of the Optimization-based Design for Manufacturing LDRD project.
This report provides detailed documentation of the algorithms that where developed and implemented in the Plato software over the course of the Optimization-based Design for Manufacturing LDRD project.
Abstract not provided.
Among the main challenges in shape optimization is the coupling of Finite Element Method (FEM) codes in a way that facilitates efficient computation of shape derivatives. This is particularly difficult with multi-physics problems involving legacy codes, where the costs of implementing and maintaining shape derivative capabilities are prohibitive. There are two mathematically equivalent approaches to computing the shape derivative: the volume method, and the boundary method. Each has a major drawback: the boundary method is less accurate, while the volume method is more invasive to the FEM code. Prior implementations of shape derivatives at Sandia have been based on the volume method. We introduce the strip method, which computes shape derivatives on a strip adjacent to the boundary. The strip method makes code coupling simple. Like the boundary method, it queries the state and adjoint solutions at quadrature nodes, but requires no knowledge of the FEM code implementations. At the same time, it exhibits the higher accuracy of the volume method. The development of the strip method also offers us the opportunity to share some lessons learned about implementing the volume method and boundary method, to show shape optimization results on problems of interest, and to begin addressing the other main challenges at hand: constraints on optimized shapes, and their interplay with optimization algorithms.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Proceedings of the 28th International Meshing Roundtable, IMR 2019
Streamline-based quad meshing algorithms use smooth cross fields to partition surfaces into quadrilateral regions by tracing cross field separatrices. In practice, re-entrant corners and misalignment of singularities lead to small regions and limit cycles, negating some of the benefits a quad layout can provide in quad meshing. We introduce three novel methods to improve on a pipeline for coarse quad partitioning. First, we formulate an efficient method to compute high-quality cross fields on curved surfaces by extending the diffusion generated method from Viertel and Osting (SISC, 2019). Next, we introduce a method for accurately computing the trajectory of streamlines through singular triangles that prevents tangential crossings. Finally, we introduce a robust method to produce coarse quad layouts by simplifying the partitions obtained via naive separatrix tracing. Our methods are tested on a database of 100 objects and the results are analyzed. The algorithm performs well both in terms of efficiency and visual results on the database when compared to state-of-the-art methods.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
A generalization of vector fields, referred to as N-direction fields or cross fields when N=4, has been recently introduced and studied for geometry processing, with applications in quadrilateral (quad) meshing, texture mapping, and parameterization. We make the observation that cross field design for two-dimensional quad meshing is related to the well-known Ginzburg-Landau problem from mathematical physics. This identification yields a variety of theoretical tools for efficiently computing boundary-aligned quad meshes, with provable guarantees on the resulting mesh, for example, the number of mesh defects and bounds on the defect locations. The procedure for generating the quad mesh is to (i) find a complex-valued "representation" field that minimizes the Dirichlet energy subject to a boundary constraint, (ii) convert the representation field into a boundary-aligned, smooth cross field, (iii) use separatrices of the cross field to partition the domain into four sided regions, and (iv) mesh each of these four-sided regions using standard techniques. Under certain assumptions on the geometry of the domain, we prove that this procedure can be used to produce a cross field whose separatrices partition the domain into four sided regions. To solve the energy minimization problem for the representation field, we use an extension of the Merriman-Bence-Osher (MBO) threshold dynamics method, originally conceived as an algorithm to simulate motion by mean curvature, to minimize the Ginzburg-Landau energy for the optimal representation field. Lastly, we demonstrate the method on a variety of test domains.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.