Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology (SFWST) Campaign of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology (FCT) is conducting research and development (R&D) on geologic disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level nuclear waste (HLW). Two high priorities for SFWST disposal R&D are design concept development and disposal system modeling. These priorities are directly addressed in the SFWST Geologic Disposal Safety Assessment (GDSA) control account, which is charged with developing a geologic repository system modeling and analysis capability, and the associated software, GDSA Framework, for evaluating disposal system performance for nuclear waste in geologic media. GDSA Framework is supported by SFWST Campaign and its predecessor the Used Fuel Disposition (UFD) campaign.

The Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology (SFWST) Campaign of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Office of Spent Fuel & Waste Disposition (SFWD) is conducting research and development (R&D) on geologic disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level nuclear waste (HLW). Two high priorities for SFWST disposal R&D are design concept development and disposal system modeling (DOE 2011, Table 6). These priorities are directly addressed in the SFWST Geologic Disposal Safety Assessment (GDSA) work package, which is charged with developing a disposal system modeling and analysis capability for evaluating disposal system performance for nuclear waste in geologic media.

The Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology (SFWST) Campaign of the U.S. Departmentof Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition(SFWD) is conducting research and development (R&D) on deep geologic disposal of spentnuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level nuclear waste (HLW). R&D addressing the disposal ofSNF/HLW in the U.S. is currently generic (i.e., "non-site-specific") in scope, following thesuspension of the Yucca Mountain Repository Project in 2010. However, to prepare for theeventuality of a repository siting process, the former Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) ofDOE-NE, which was succeeded by the SFWST Campaign, formulated an R&D Roadmap in 2012outlining generic R&D activities and their priorities appropriate for developing safety cases andassociated performance assessment (PA) models for generic deep geologic repositories in severalpotential host-rock environments in the contiguous United States. This 2012 UFDC Roadmap alsoidentified the importance of re-evaluating priorities in future years as knowledge is gained fromthe DOE's ongoing R&D activities.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology (SFWST) Campaign of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy, Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition (SFWD), has been conducting research and development on generic deep geologic disposal systems (i.e., geologic repositories). This report describes specific activities in fiscal year (FY) 2019 associated with FY19 Geologic Disposal Safety Assessment (GDSA) Repository Systems Analysis (RSA) work package within the SFWST Campaign. The overall objective of the GDSA RSA work package is to develop generic deep geologic repository concepts and system performance assessment (PA) models in several host-rock environments, and to simulate and analyze these generic repository concepts and models using the GDSA Framework toolkit, and other tools as needed.

The Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology (SFWST) Campaign of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition (SFWD) is conducting research and development (R&D) on deep geologic disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level nuclear waste (HLW). R&D addressing the disposal of SNF/HLW in the U.S. is currently generic (i.e., "non-site-specific") in scope, following the suspension of the Yucca Mountain Repository Project in 2010. However, to prepare for the eventuality of a repository siting process, the former Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) of DOE-NE, which was succeeded by the SFWST Campaign, formulated an R&D Roadmap in 2012 outlining generic R&D activities and their priorities appropriate for developing safety cases and associated performance assessment (PA) models for generic deep geologic repositories in several potential host-rock environments in the contiguous United States. This 2012 UFDC Roadmap also identified the importance of re-evaluating priorities in future years as knowledge is gained from the DOE's ongoing R&D activities.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Probabilistic simulations of the post-closure performance of a generic deep geologic repository for commercial spent nuclear fuel in shale host rock provide a test case for comparing sensitivity analysis methods available in Geologic Disposal Safety Assessment (GDSA) Framework, the U.S. Department of Energy's state-of-the-art toolkit for repository performance assessment. Simulations assume a thick low-permeability shale with aquifers (potential paths to the biosphere) above and below the host rock. Multi-physics simulations on the 7-million-cell grid are run in a high-performance computing environment with PFLOTRAN. Epistemic uncertain inputs include properties of the engineered and natural systems. The output variables of interest, maximum I-129 concentrations (independent of time) at observation points in the aquifers, vary over several orders of magnitude. Variance-based global sensitivity analyses (i.e., calculations of sensitivity indices) conducted with Dakota use polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) and Gaussian process (GP) surrogate models. Results of analyses conducted with raw output concentrations and with log-transformed output concentrations are compared. Using log-transformed concentrations results in larger sensitivity indices for more influential input variables, smaller sensitivity indices for less influential input variables, and more consistent values for sensitivity indices between methods (PCE and GP) and between analyses repeated with samples of different sizes.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.