Publications

Results 76–100 of 168

Search results

Jump to search filters

Multilevel uncertainty quantification of a wind turbine large eddy simulation model

Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Computational Mechanics: Solids, Structures and Coupled Problems, ECCM 2018 and 7th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, ECFD 2018

Maniaci, David C.; Frankel, A.; Geraci, Gianluca; Blaylock, Myra L.; Eldred, Michael S.

Wind energy is stochastic in nature; the prediction of aerodynamic quantities and loads relevant to wind energy applications involves modeling the interaction of a range of physics over many scales for many different cases. These predictions require a range of model fidelity, as predictive models that include the interaction of atmospheric and wind turbine wake physics can take weeks to solve on institutional high performance computing systems. In order to quantify the uncertainty in predictions of wind energy quantities with multiple models, researchers at Sandia National Laboratories have applied Multilevel-Multifidelity methods. A demonstration study was completed using simulations of a NREL 5MW rotor in an atmospheric boundary layer with wake interaction. The flow was simulated with two models of disparate fidelity; an actuator line wind plant large-eddy scale model, Nalu, using several mesh resolutions in combination with a lower fidelity model, OpenFAST. Uncertainties in the flow conditions and actuator forces were propagated through the model using Monte Carlo sampling to estimate the velocity defect in the wake and forces on the rotor. Coarse-mesh simulations were leveraged along with the lower-fidelity flow model to reduce the variance of the estimator, and the resulting Multilevel-Multifidelity strategy demonstrated a substantial improvement in estimator efficiency compared to the standard Monte Carlo method.

More Details

V&V Integrated Program Planning for Wind Plant Performance

Naughton, Jonathan W.; Maniaci, David C.

The Department of Energy Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) initiative has undertaken an experimental planning process for a validation directed program and an experimental planning process directed at improving simulations of wind plant performance. The validation process has been divided into two main sections: Integrated Program Planning, and Integrated Experiment and Model Planning and Execution. This document covers the Integrated Program Planning process in detail as it has been applied to the validation and assessment of models of various fidelity to predict wind plant performance. Three main parts of this process are presented in this document: the Phenomenon Identification and Ranking Table, the Validation Hierarchy, and the Prioritized Phenomenon and Experiment Mapping table. The document concludes with a description of validation program process next steps, which includes the planning and execution of integrated experiment and model campaigns

More Details

Comparison of field measurements and large eddy simulations of the scaled wind farm technology (SWIFT) site

ASME-JSME-KSME 2019 8th Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, AJKFluids 2019

Blaylock, Myra L.; Houchens, Brent C.; Maniaci, David C.; Herges, Thomas; Bays, Nathan R.; Knaus, Robert C.; Sakievich, Philip

Power production of the turbines at the Department of Energy/Sandia National Laboratories Scaled Wind Farm Technology (SWiFT) facility located at the Texas Tech University’s National Wind Institute Research Center was measured experimentally and simulated for neutral atmospheric boundary layer operating conditions. Two V27 wind turbines were aligned in series with the dominant wind direction, and the upwind turbine was yawed to investigate the impact of wake steering on the downwind turbine. Two conditions were investigated, including that of the leading turbine operating alone and both turbines operating in series. The field measurements include meteorological evaluation tower (MET) data and light detection and ranging (lidar) data. Computations were performed by coupling large eddy simulations (LES) in the three-dimensional, transient code Nalu-Wind with engineering actuator line models of the turbines from OpenFAST. The simulations consist of a coarse precursor without the turbines to set up an atmospheric boundary layer inflow followed by a simulation with refinement near the turbines. Good agreement between simulations and field data are shown. These results demonstrate that Nalu-Wind holds the promise for the prediction of wind plant power and loads for a range of yaw conditions.

More Details

A2e High-Fidelity Modeling (HFM) Project Overview (Q2 FY2018 Milestone Completion) [Slides]

Maniaci, David C.; Sprague, Michael A.

Annual Milestone (joint NREL/SNL): Create and disseminate documentation that compares the Nalu and SOWFA codes for actuator-line-based wind farm models, including the demonstration of the Windpark Egmond aan Zee (OWEZ). Comparisons will include simulation results for the same cases, assessing computational speed and scalability.

More Details

Uncertainty quantification framework for wind turbine wake measurements with a scanning lidar

Wind Energy Symposium, 2018

Herges, Thomas; Maniaci, David C.; Naughton, Brian

Sandia National Laboratories and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory conducted a field campaign at the Scaled Wind Farm Technology (SWiFT) Facility using a customized scanning lidar from the Technical University of Denmark. The results from this field campaign were used to assess the predictive capability of computational models to capture wake dissipation and wake trajectory downstream of a wind turbine. The present work used large-eddy simulations of the wind turbine wake and a virtual SpinnerLidar to quantify the uncertainty of wind turbine wake position due to the line-of-sight sampling and probe volume averaging effects of the lidar. The LES simulations were of the SWiFT wind turbine at both a 0° and 30° yaw offset with a stable inflow. The wake position extracted from the simulated lidar sampling had an uncertainty of 2.8 m and m as compared to the wake position extracted from the full velocity field with 0° and 30° yaw offset, respectively. The larger uncertainty in calculated wake position of the 30° yaw offset case was due to the increased angle of the wake position relative to the axial flow direction and the resulting decrease in the line-of-sight velocity relative the axial velocity.

More Details
Results 76–100 of 168
Results 76–100 of 168
Top