Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

This document includes the information pertaining to the practices of the Emergency Response Software Development Team (ERSDT) for the RASCAL software project. The content includes information regarding: 1) Software Quality Assurance. 2) Project Management. 3) Configuration Management. 4) Development Standards. 5) Third-Party Software. 6) Verification and Validation. The information contained in this report is considered living documentation. The information contained in this report was assembled from multiple documents and content management systems.

In the summer of 2020, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) plans to launch a spacecraft as part of the Mars 2020 mission. The rover on the proposed spacecraft will use a Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) to provide continuous electrical and thermal power for the mission. The MMRTG uses radioactive plutonium dioxide. NASA is preparing a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the mission in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. This Nuclear Risk Assessment addresses the responses of the MMRTG option to potential accident and abort conditions during the launch opportunity for the Mars 2020 mission and the associated consequences. This information provides the technical basis for the radiological risks discussed in the SEIS.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The software team that develops Turbo FRMAC (TF) at Sandia National Labs has continued to look for technologies to add Cloud-enabling features to Turbo FRMAC. The Amazon AppStream service has now matured into a viable low-cost solution with quick turnaround potential to create a Cloud version of Turbo FRMAC. This service would allow both a Desktop and Cloud version of Turbo FRMAC to exist without duplicate efforts to support both instances. The only software needed to run is a modern Web Browser — no downloads and no installation necessary.

The Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Center (FRMAC) has two major assets it uses to perform it responsibilities for responding to a radiological emergency. These are the National Atmospheric Release Advisory Capability (NARAC) and Turbo FRMAC. Recently NARAC updated their deposition model to the state of the art Petroff and Zhang model leading to a significant discrepancy between these two assets in regards to deposition modeling. This report describes the investigation into an appropriate deposition model for Turbo FRMAC to bring the two assets back into line. The ultimate conclusion is that Petroff and Zhang is too complicated for Turbo FRMAC, but the model of Feng is not and is equal to Petroff and Zhang in predictive capability.

Abstract not provided.

The Sandia-developed Transport of Radioactive Materials (STORM) code suite is used as part of the Radioisotope Power System Launch Safety (RPSLS) program to perform statistical modeling of the consequences due to release of radioactive material given a launch accident. As part of this modeling, STORM samples input parameters from probability distributions with some parameters treated as constants. This report described the work done to convert four of these constant inputs (Consumption Rate, Average Crop Yield, Cropland to Landuse Database Ratio, and Crop Uptake Factor) to sampled values. Consumption rate changed from a constant value of 557.68 kg / yr to a normal distribution with a mean of 102.96 kg / yr and a standard deviation of 2.65 kg / yr. Meanwhile, Average Crop Yield changed from a constant value of 3.783 kg edible / m ² to a normal distribution with a mean of 3.23 kg edible / m ² and a standard deviation of 0.442 kg edible / m ² . The Cropland to Landuse Database ratio changed from a constant value of 0.0996 (9.96%) to a normal distribution with a mean value of 0.0312 (3.12%) and a standard deviation of 0.00292 (0.29%). Finally the crop uptake factor changed from a constant value of 6.37e^-4 (Bq crop /kg)/(Bq soil /kg) to a lognormal distribution with a geometric mean value of 3.38e^-4 (Bq crop /kg)/(Bq soil /kg) and a standard deviation value of 3.33 (Bq crop /kg)/(Bq soil /kg)

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.