Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

This memo summarizes the aerodynamic drag scoping work done for Goodyear in early FY18. The work is to evaluate the feasibility of using Sierra/Low-Mach (Fuego) for drag predictions of rolling tires, particularly focused on the effects of tire features such as lettering, sidewall geometry, rim geometry, and interaction with the vehicle body. The work is broken into two parts. Part 1 consisted of investigation of a canonical validation problem (turbulent flow over a cylinder) using existing tools with different meshes and turbulence models. Part 2 involved calculating drag differences over plate geometries with simple features (ridges and grooves) defined by Goodyear of approximately the size of interest for a tire. The results of part 1 show the level of noise to be expected in a drag calculation and highlight the sensitivity of absolute predictions to model parameters such as mesh size and turbulence model. There is 20-30% noise in the experimental measurements on the canonical cylinder problem, and a similar level of variation between different meshes and turbulence models. Part 2 shows that there is a notable difference in the predicted drag on the sample plate geometries, however, the computational cost of extending the LES model to a full tire would be significant. This cost could be reduced by implementation of more sophisticated wall and turbulence models (e.g. detached eddy simulations - DES) and by focusing the mesh refinement on feature subsets with the goal of comparing configurations rather than absolute predictivity for the whole tire.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

This report presents multi-phase modeling approaches that are developed for simulating rubble fire scenarios similar to a large-scale rubble pool fire test at Sandia National Laboratories using composite materials and jet fuel. The rubble pool fire test burnt oddly shaped combustible solid objects submerged in liquid fuel. As an intermediate step toward a full scale rubble fire simulation, various model improvement tasks were performed. For modeling solid decomposition, a multi-step degradation model was used for canonical verification problems and the Chemical Percolation for Devolatilization (CPD) approach was implemented. Capabilities of Lagrangian particle approach has been extended such that a group of particles may represent a solid bulk. For gas-liquid interface, the volume of fluid (VOF) technique was implemented and relevant physics were added. The developed tools offer a potential for simulating three-phase (gas, liquid, and solid) combustion applications.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

With growing use of carbon fiber-epoxy in transportation systems, it is important to understand fire reaction properties of the composite to ensure passenger safety. Recently, a micro-scale pyrolysis study and macro-scale fire tests were performed using carbon fiber-epoxy at Sandia National Laboratories. Current work focuses on numerical modeling of the material conversion, pyrolysis, and gas-phase combustion that replicate the experiments. Large-eddy simulations (LES) and eddy-dissipation concept (EDC) approach are incorporated in the gas phase along with multiple relevant reaction model methods in the solid phase. The numerical methods that use multi-step pyrolysis rate expressions are validated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) results. The pyrolyzed fuel components participate in gas-phase combustion using a turbulent combustion model. The multi-phase combustion capability was further assessed using two cases: a single particle reaction and a solid panel exposed to strong radiant heat. The panel fire test indicates that the model accurately reproduces panel temperature profile while a weaker oxidation is predicted.

Abstract not provided.

Safety basis analysts throughout the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) complex rely heavily on the information provided in the DOE Handbook, DOE - HDBK - 3010, Airborne Release Fractions/Rates and Respirable Fractions for Nonreactor Nuclear Facilities, to determine radionuclide source terms. In calculating source terms, analysts tend to use the DOE Handbook's bounding values on airborne release fractions (ARFs) and respirable fractions (RFs) for various categories of insults (representing potential accident release categories). This is typically due to both time constraints and the avoidance of regulatory critique. Unfortunately, these bounding ARFs/RFs represent extremely conservative values. Moreover, they were derived from very limited small-scale bench/laboratory experiments and/or from engineered judgment. Thus, the basis for the data may not be representative of the actual unique accident conditions and configurations being evaluated. The goal of this research is to develop a more accurate and defensible method to determine bounding values for the DOE Handbook using state-of-art multi-physics-based computer codes. This enables us to better understand the fundamental physics and phenomena associated with the types of accidents in the handbook. In this year, this research included improvements of the high-fidelity codes to model particle resuspension and multi-component evaporation for fire scenarios. We also began to model ceramic fragmentation experiments, and to reanalyze the liquid fire and powder release experiments that were done last year. The results show that the added physics better describes the fragmentation phenomena. Thus, this work provides a low-cost method to establish physics-justified safety bounds by taking into account specific geometries and conditions that may not have been previously measured and/or are too costly to perform.

Abstract not provided.