Publications

Abstract not provided.

For weapon safety assessments, Sandia has an interest in accurately predicting failure of pressure vessels at high temperature. In order to assess Sandia's predictive capability for these problems, a simplified validation problem for thermo-mechanical failure due to pressurization was developed and is referred to as the pipe bomb problem. In this study, several pipes were heated in a non-isothermal manner and pressurized until failure. The previous attempt to accurately predict the pipe bombs' failure pressures demonstrated a notable unconservative prediction. Due to this large bias in the simulation failure pressures toward higher pressures, we assumed that a mechanism driving failure or another aspect of the tests was missed in the original models. The goal of this work was to investigate potential sources of this bias focusing on geometric uncertainty and material model assumptions. As with the previous work, our simulations of the pipe bomb experiments using the BCJ material model over predicted the failure pressures. While success cannot be claimed for the simulated failure pressures, we believe we accurately identified the remaining sources of error in the simulations. Specifically, the temperature mapping algorithm and the geometry are believed to be the primary contributors to the errors. As a result, future work should focus on improving the temperature mapping algorithm and consider using temperature fields determined by a calibrated thermal model that includes convection. Additionally, CT scans of remaining portions of the pipe bomb material inner diameter should be taken to further understand the variability this unmachined surface introduced to the pipe bomb specimens.

Abstract not provided.

Modeling material and component behavior using finite element analysis (FEA) is critical for modern engineering. One key to a credible model is having an accurate material model, with calibrated model parameters, which describes the constitutive relationship between the deformation and the resulting stress in the material. As such, identifying material model parameters is critical to accurate and predictive FEA. Traditional calibration approaches use only global data (e.g. extensometers and resultant force) and simplified geometries to find the parameters. However, the utilization of rapidly maturing full-field characterization techniques (e.g. Digital Image Correlation (DIC)) with inverse techniques (e.g. the Virtual Feilds Method (VFM)) provide a new, novel and improved method for parameter identification. This LDRD tested that idea: in particular, whether more parameters could be identified per test when using full-field data. The research described in this report successfully proves this hypothesis by comparing the VFM results with traditional calibration methods. Important products of the research include: verified VFM codes for identifying model parameters, a new look at parameter covariance in material model parameter estimation, new validation techniques to better utilize full-field measurements, and an exploration of optimized specimen design for improved data richness.

Abstract not provided.

Traditionally, material identification is performed using global load and displacement data from simple boundary-value problems such as uni-axial tensile and simple shear tests. More recently, however, inverse techniques such as the Virtual Fields Method (VFM) that capitalize on heterogeneous, full-field deformation data have gained popularity. In this work, we have written a VFM code in a finite-deformation framework for calibration of a viscoplastic (i.e. strain-rate dependent) material model for 304L stainless steel. Using simulated experimental data generated via finite-element analysis (FEA), we verified our VFM code and compared the identified parameters with the reference parameters input into the FEA. The identified material model parameters had surprisingly large error compared to the reference parameters, which was traced to parameter covariance and the existence of many essentially equivalent parameter sets. This parameter non-uniqueness and its implications for FEA predictions is discussed in detail. Lastly, we present two strategies to reduce parameter covariance – reduced parametrization of the material model and increased richness of the calibration data – which allow for the recovery of a unique solution.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Partial penetration laser welds join metal surfaces without additional filler material, providing hermetic seals for a variety of components. The crack-like geometry of a partial penetration weld is a local stress riser that may lead to failure of the component in the weld. Computational modeling of laser welds has shown that the model should include damage evolution to predict the large deformation and failure. We have performed interrupted tensile experiments both to characterize the damage evolution and failure in laser welds and to aid computational modeling of these welds. Several EDM-notched and laser-welded 304L stainless steel tensile coupons were pulled in tension, each one to a different load level, and then sectioned and imaged to show the evolution of damage in the laser weld and in the EDM-notched parent 304L material (having a similar geometry to the partial penetration laser-welded material). SEM imaging of these specimens revealed considerable cracking at the root of the laser welds and some visible micro-cracking in the root of the EDM notch even before peak load was achieved in these specimens. The images also showed deformation-induced damage in the root of the notch and laser weld prior to the appearance of the main crack, though the laser-welded specimens tended to have more extensive damage than the notched material. These experiments show that the local geometry alone is not the cause of the damage, but also microstructure of the laser weld, which requires additional investigation.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Ductile failure of structural metals is relevant to a wide range of engineering scenarios. Computational methods are employed to anticipate the critical conditions of failure, yet they sometimes provide inaccurate and misleading predictions. Challenge scenarios, such as the one presented in the current work, provide an opportunity to assess the blind, quantitative predictive ability of simulation methods against a previously unseen failure problem. Rather than evaluate the predictions of a single simulation approach, the Sandia Fracture Challenge relies on numerous volunteer teams with expertise in computational mechanics to apply a broad range of computational methods, numerical algorithms, and constitutive models to the challenge. This exercise is intended to evaluate the state of health of technologies available for failure prediction. In the first Sandia Fracture Challenge, a wide range of issues were raised in ductile failure modeling, including a lack of consistency in failure models, the importance of shear calibration data, and difficulties in quantifying the uncertainty of prediction [see Boyce et al. (Int J Fract 186:5–68, 2014) for details of these observations]. This second Sandia Fracture Challenge investigated the ductile rupture of a Ti–6Al–4V sheet under both quasi-static and modest-rate dynamic loading (failure in (Formula presented.) 0.1 s). Like the previous challenge, the sheet had an unusual arrangement of notches and holes that added geometric complexity and fostered a competition between tensile- and shear-dominated failure modes. The teams were asked to predict the fracture path and quantitative far-field failure metrics such as the peak force and displacement to cause crack initiation. Fourteen teams contributed blind predictions, and the experimental outcomes were quantified in three independent test labs. Additional shortcomings were revealed in this second challenge such as inconsistency in the application of appropriate boundary conditions, need for a thermomechanical treatment of the heat generation in the dynamic loading condition, and further difficulties in model calibration based on limited real-world engineering data. As with the prior challenge, this work not only documents the ‘state-of-the-art’ in computational failure prediction of ductile tearing scenarios, but also provides a detailed dataset for non-blind assessment of alternative methods.

The second Sandia Fracture Challenge illustrates that predicting the ductile fracture of Ti-6Al-4V subjected to moderate and elevated rates of loading requires thermomechanical coupling, elasto-thermo-poro-viscoplastic constitutive models with the physics of anisotropy and regularized numerical methods for crack initiation and propagation. We detail our initial approach with an emphasis on iterative calibration and systematically increasing complexity to accommodate anisotropy in the context of an isotropic material model. Blind predictions illustrate strengths and weaknesses of our initial approach. We then revisit our findings to illustrate the importance of including anisotropy in the failure process. Mesh-independent solutions of continuum damage models having both isotropic and anisotropic yields surfaces are obtained through nonlocality and localization elements.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.