The cost of photovoltaic (PV) modules has declined by 85% since 2010. To achieve this reduction, manufacturers altered module designs and bill of materials; changes that could affect module durability and reliability. To determine if these changes have affected module durability, we measured the performance degradation of 834 fielded PV modules representing 13 module types from 7 manufacturers in 3 climates over 5 years. Degradation rates (Rd) are highly nonlinear over time, and seasonal variations are present in some module types. Mean and median degradation rate values of −0.62%/year and −0.58%/year, respectively, are consistent with rates measured for older modules. Of the 23 systems studied, 6 have degradation rates that will exceed the warranty limits in the future, whereas 13 systems demonstrate the potential of achieving lifetimes beyond 30 years, assuming Rd trends have stabilized.
Photovoltaic modules are subjected to various mechanical stressors in their deployment environments, ranging from installation handling to wind and snow loads. Damage incurred during these mechanical events has the potential to initiate subsequent degradation mechanisms, reducing useful module lifespan. Thus, characterizing the mechanical state of photovoltaic modules is pertinent to the development of reliable packaging designs. In this work, photovoltaic modules with strain gauges directly incorporated into the module laminate were fabricated and subjected to mechanical loading to characterize internal strains within the module when under load. These experimental measurements were then compared against results obtained by high-fidelity finite-element simulations. The simulation results showed reasonable agreement in the strain values over time; however, there were large discrepancies in the magnitudes of these strains. Both the instrumentation technique and the finite-element simulations have areas where they can improve. These areas of improvement have been documented. Despite the observed discrepancies between the experimental and simulated results, the module instrumentation proved to be a useful gauge in monitoring and characterizing the mechanical state. With some process improvements, this method could potentially be applied to other environments that a photovoltaic module will encounter in its lifetime that are known to cause damage and degrade performance.
Studying the mechanical behavior of silicon cell fractures is critical for understanding changes in PV module performance. Traditional methods of detecting cell cracks, e.g., electroluminescence (EL) imaging, utilize electrical changes and defects associated with cell fracture. Therefore, these methods reveal crack locations, but do not operate at the time or length scales required to accurately measure other physical properties of cracks, such as separation width and behavior under dynamic loads.
Photovoltaic energy prediction models include functions or modifiers to account for sun angle reflection losses. These functions may be known interchangeably as Angle of Incidence (AOI) or Incident Angle Modifier (IAM). While standards exist, there is no universally accepted single best practice for developing these functions. They can be generated through characterization of representative modules or single cells, in natural sunlight or indoors using simulated light sources. Repeatability of measurements and the viability of cross-laboratory comparisons are critical to confidence in validation of both methods. To investigate the differences between methods and labs, The Technical University of Denmark (DTU) initiated an international round-robin test comparison between several key test labs with AOI measurement capability. A total of six minimodules were provided in three different cell/interconnect/backsheet combinations. Sandia characterized these minimodules using methods developed over two decades specifically for the outdoor characterization of full-size photovoltaic modules. This report documents the characterization results, summarizes key observations and tabulates the processed data for comparison to results provided by other characterization labs.
Anti-reflective coatings (ARCs) are commonly applied to commercial modules to reduce reflection losses and improve energy harvest. Relative performance at low incidence angle is often indistinguishable between different modules and it is only at high incidence angle that performance becomes differentiated. It is also precisely in this range that accurate measurements are the most difficult to obtain, complicating efforts to compare the benefits of different coatings. In this study, the performance of multiple commercial modules with different coatings were compared. A differential approach was employed, facilitating relative comparisons between test devices and a common reference. Using this method, performance differences at high incidence angles could be visualized and quantified. Differential analysis was extended to multiple system performance models in order to predict and quantify potential improvements in annual energy harvest. Improvements were observed upwards of 1% seasonally and 0.5% annually for the best performing coatings. 10° fixed tilt systems were seen to potentially benefit the most from ARCs, while single axis trackers benefitted the least.
Angle of incidence response of a photovoltaic module describes its light gathering capability when incident sunlight is at an orientation other than normal to the module's surface. At low incident angles (i.e. close to normal), most modules have similar responses. However, at increasing incident angles, reflective losses dominate response and relative module performance becomes differentiated. Relative performance in this range is important for understanding the potential power output of utility - scale ph otovoltaic systems. In this report, we document the relative angle of incidence response of four utility - grade panels to each other and to four First Solar modules. We found that response was nearly identical between all modules up to an incident angle of ~55°. At higher angles, differences of up to 5% were observed. A module from Yingli was the best performing commercial module while a First Solar test module with a non - production anti - reflective coating was the best overall performer. This page left blank
Current-voltage (I-V) curve traces of photovoltaic (PV) systems can provide detailed information for diagnosing fault conditions. The present work implemented an in situ, automatic I-V curve tracer system coupled with Support Vector Machine and a Gaussian Process algorithms to classify and estimate abnormal and normal PV performance. The approach successfully identified normal and fault conditions. In addition, the Gaussian Process regression algorithm was used to estimate ideal I-V curves based on a given irradiance and temperature condition. The estimation results were then used to calculate the lost power due to the fault condition.
The Sandia Array Performance Model (SAPM), a semi-empirical model for predicting PV system power, has been in use for more than a decade. While several studies have presented laboratory intercomparisons of measurements and analysis, detailed procedures for determining model coefficients have never been published. Independent test laboratories must develop in-house procedures to determine SAPM coefficients, which contributes to uncertainty in the resulting models. In response to requests from commercial laboratories and module manufacturers, Sandia has formally documented the measurement and analysis methods as a supplement to the original model description. In this paper we present a description of the measurement procedures and an example analysis for calibrating the SAPM.
The Sandia Array Performance Model (SAPM), a semi-empirical model for predicting PV system power, has been in use for more than a decade. While several studies have presented laboratory intercomparisons of measurements and analysis, detailed procedures for determining model coefficients have never been published. Independent test laboratories must develop in-house procedures to determine SAPM coefficients, which contributes to uncertainty in the resulting models. In response to requests from commercial laboratories and module manufacturers, Sandia has formally documented the measurement and analysis methods as a supplement to the original model description. In this paper we present a description of the measurement procedures and an example analysis for calibrating the SAPM.
Determination of module temperature coefficients for voltage, current and power requires measuring the average of cell temperatures. Conventional practice is to place thermocouples or resistive temperature devices (RTDs) at a few locations on a module's back surface and to average the readings, which may not accurately represent the average temperature over all cells. We investigate the suitability of averaging RTDs, which measure average temperature along a 1m length, to accurately measure the average cell temperature when determining temperature coefficients outdoors.
The Sandia Array Performance Model (SAPM), a semi-empirical model for predicting PV system power, has been in use for more than a decade. While several studies have presented comparisons of measurements and analysis results among laboratories, detailed procedures for determining model coefficients have not yet been published. Independent test laboratories must develop in-house procedures to determine SAPM coefficients, which contributes to uncertainty in the resulting models. Here we present a standard procedure for calibrating the SAPM using outdoor electrical and meteorological measurements. Analysis procedures are illustrated with data measured outdoors for a 36-cell silicon photovoltaic module.
Reflection losses from a PV module become increasingly pronounced at solar incident angles >60°. However, accurate measurement in this region can be problematic due to tracker articulation limits and irradiance reference device calibration. We present the results of a measurement method enabling modules to be tested over the full range of 0-90° by articulating the tracker in elevation only. This facilitates the use of a shaded pyranometer to make a direct measurement of the diffuse component, reducing measurement uncertainty. We further present the results of a real-time intercomparison performed by two independent test facilities ∼10 km apart.
We present a method for measuring the series resistance of the PV module, string, or array that does not require measuring a full IV curve or meteorological data. Our method relies only on measurements of open circuit voltage and maximum power voltage and current, which can be readily obtained using standard PV monitoring equipment; measured short circuit current is not required. We validate the technique by adding fixed resistors to a PV circuit and demonstrating that the method can predict the added resistance. Relative prediction accuracy appears highest for smaller changes in resistance, with a systematic underestimation at larger resistances. Series resistance is shown to vary with irradiance levels with random errors below 1.5% standard deviation.
