Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Steel pressure vessels are commonly used for the transport of pressurized gases, including gaseous hydrogen. In the majority of cases, these transport cylinders experience relatively few pressure cycles over their lifetime, perhaps as many as 25 per year, and generally significantly less. For fueling applications, as in fuel tanks on hydrogen-powered industrial trucks, the hydrogen fuel systems may experience thousands of cycles over their lifetime. Similarly, it can be anticipated that the use of tube trailers for large-scale distribution of gaseous hydrogen will require lifetimes of thousands of pressure cycles. This study investigates the fatigue life of steel pressure vessels that are similar to transport cylinders by subjecting full-scale vessels to pressure cycles with gaseous hydrogen between nominal pressure of 3 and 44 MPa. In addition to pressure cycling of vessels that are similar to those in service, engineered defects were machined on the inside of several pressure vessels to simulate manufacturing defects and to initiate failure after relatively low number of cycles. Failure was not observed in as-manufactured vessels with more than 55,000 pressure cycles, nor in vessels with relatively small, engineered defects subjected to more than 40,000 cycles. Large engineered defects (with depth greater than 5% of the wall thickness) resulted in failure after 8,000 to 15,000 pressure cycles. Defects machined to depths less than 5% wall thickness did not induce failures. Four pressure vessel failures were observed during the course of this project and, in all cases, failure occurred by leak before burst. The performance of the tested vessels is compared to two design approaches: fracture mechanics design approach and traditional fatigue analysis design approach. The results from this work have been used as the basis for the design rules for Type 1 fuel tanks in the standard entitled "Compressed Hydrogen-Powered Industrial Truck, On-board Fuel Storage and Handling Components (HPIT1)" from CSA America. Copyright © 2012 by ASME.

Steel pressure vessels are commonly used for the transport of pressurized gases, including gaseous hydrogen. In the majority of cases, these transport cylinders experience relatively few pressure cycles over their lifetime, perhaps as many as 25 per year, and generally significantly less. For fueling applications, as in fuel tanks on hydrogen-powered industrial trucks, the hydrogen fuel systems may experience thousands of cycles over their lifetime. Similarly, it can be anticipated that the use of tube trailers for large-scale distribution of gaseous hydrogen will require lifetimes of thousands of pressure cycles. This study investigates the fatigue life of steel pressure vessels that are similar to transport cylinders by subjecting full-scale vessels to pressure cycles with gaseous hydrogen between nominal pressure of 3 and 44 MPa. In addition to pressure cycling of vessels that are similar to those in service, engineered defects were machined on the inside of several pressure vessels to simulate manufacturing defects and to initiate failure after relatively low number of cycles. Failure was not observed in as-manufactured vessels with more than 55,000 pressure cycles, nor in vessels with relatively small, engineered defects subjected to more than 40,000 cycles. Large engineered defects (with depth greater than 5% of the wall thickness) resulted in failure after 8,000 to 15,000 pressure cycles. Defects machined to depths less than 5% wall thickness did not induce failures. Four pressure vessel failures were observed during the course of this project and, in all cases, failure occurred by leak before burst. The performance of the tested vessels is compared to two design approaches: fracture mechanics design approach and traditional fatigue analysis design approach. The results from this work have been used as the basis for the design rules for Type 1 fuel tanks in the standard entitled "Compressed Hydrogen-Powered Industrial Truck, On-board Fuel Storage and Handling Components (HPIT1)" from CSA America. Copyright © 2012 by ASME.

As hydrogen fuel cell technologies achieve market penetration, there is a growing need to characterize a range of structural metals that are used in the hydrogen environments that are encountered in gaseous hydrogen fuel systems. A review of existing data show that hydrogen can significantly accelerate fatigue crack growth of many common structural metals; however, comprehensive characterization of the effects of hydrogen on fatigue properties is generally lacking from the literature, even for structural metals that have been used extensively in high-pressure gaseous hydrogen environments. This report provides new testing data on the effects of hydrogen on fatigue of structural metals that are commonly employed in high-pressure gaseous hydrogen. Copyright © 2011 by ASME.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Fatigue crack growth rates and rising displacement fracture thresholds have been measured for a 4130X steel in 45 MPa hydrogen gas. the ratio of minimum to maximum load (R-ratio) and cyclic frequency was varied to assess the effects of these variables on fatigue crack growth rates. Decreasing frequency and increasing R were both found to increase crack growth rate, however, these variables are not independent of each other. Changing frequency from 0.1 Hz to 1 Hz reduced crack growth rates at R = 0.5, but had no effect at R = 0.1. When applied to a design life calculation for a steel pressure vessel consistent with a typical hydrogen trailer tube, the measured fatigue and fracture data predicted a re-inspection interval of nearly 29 years, consistent with the excellent service history of such vessels which have been in use for many years. Copyright © 2010 by ASME.

Gaseous hydrogen is an alternative to petroleum-based fuels, but it is known to significantly reduce the fatigue and fracture resistance of steels. Steels are commonly used for containment and distribution of gaseous hydrogen, albeit under conservative operating conditions (i.e., large safety factors) to mitigate so-called gaseous hydrogen embrittlement. Economical methods of distributing gaseous hydrogen (such as using existing pipeline infrastructure) are necessary to make hydrogen fuel competitive with alternatives. the effects of gaseous hydrogen on fracture resistance and fatigue resistance of pipeline steels, however, has not been comprehensively evaluated and this data is necessary for structural integrity assessment in gaseous hydrogen environments. In addition, existing standardized test methods for environment assisted cracking under sustained load appear to be inadequate to characterize low-strength steels (such as pipeline steels) exposed to relevant gaseous hydrogen environments. In this study, the principles of fracture mechanics are used to compare the fracture and fatigue performance of two pipeline steels in high-purity gaseous hydrogen at two pressures: 5.5 MPa and 21 MPa. In particular, elastic-plastic fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth rates were measured using the compact tension geometry and a pressure vessel designed for testing materials while exposed to gaseous hydrogen. Copyright © 2010 by ASME.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Threshold stress intensity factors were measured in high-pressure hydrogen gas for a variety of low alloy ferritic steels using both constant crack opening displacement and rising crack opening displacement procedures. The sustained load cracking procedures are generally consistent with those in ASME Article KD-10 of Section VIII Division 3 of the Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, which was recently published to guide design of high-pressure hydrogen vessels. Three definitions of threshold were established for the two test methods: K{sub THi}* is the maximum applied stress intensity factor for which no crack extension was observed under constant displacement; K{sub THa} is the stress intensity factor at the arrest position for a crack that extended under constant displacement; and K{sub JH} is the stress intensity factor at the onset of crack extension under rising displacement. The apparent crack initiation threshold under constant displacement, K{sub THi}*, and the crack arrest threshold, K{sub THa}, were both found to be non-conservative due to the hydrogen exposure and crack-tip deformation histories associated with typical procedures for sustained-load cracking tests under constant displacement. In contrast, K{sub JH}, which is measured under concurrent rising displacement and hydrogen gas exposure, provides a more conservative hydrogen-assisted fracture threshold that is relevant to structural components in which sub-critical crack extension is driven by internal hydrogen gas pressure.

Abstract not provided.