Publications

Abstract not provided.

Recent investigations like the second and third Sandia Fracture Challenges have characterized and demonstrated the performance of a variety of failure techniques and models. These surveys have considered a wide breadth of models encapsulating both general failure criteria as well as those focusing on pore nucleation and growth. Extensive reviews exist on both topics. The former category generally consists of classic models like the Johnson-Cook or Wilkins criteria. These models were recently added to modular plasticity models in the Library of Advanced Materials for Engineering (LAME) as criteria for use with element death capabilities. The latter category was not treated in that effort. There exists a large class of failure models based on predicting the evolution of pores and failure associated with such microstructures. While the exact mechanisms and corresponding impact on the macroscale behavior remain an active area of research, a large suite of formulations have been proposed combining different features of both pore nucleation and subsequent growth. The most famous of these are based on the popular Gurson model of pore growth derived via micromechanical analysis assuming a plastically incompressible matrix. Numerous other models exist for both growth and nucleation and the Cocks-Ashby growth and Horstemeyer-Gokhale nucleation models have been used successfully in recent Sandia Fracture Challenges. This specific combination is colloquially referred to as the "BCJ-failure model as it has been frequently used with the Bammann-Chisea-Johnson plasticity model.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Time-dependent, viscoelastic responses of materials like polymers and glasses have long been studied. As such, a variety of models have been put forth to describe the behavior including simple rheological models (e.g. Maxwell, Kelvin), linear "fading memory" theories, and hereditary integral based linear thermal viscoelastic approaches as well as more recent nonlinear theories that are either integral, fictive temperature, or differential internal state variable based. The current work details a new LINEAR_THERMOVISCOELASTIC model that has been added to LAME. This formulation represents a viscoelastic theory that neglects some of the phenomenological details of the PEC/SPEC models in favor of efficiency and simplicity. Furthermore, this new model is a first step towards developing "modular" viscoelastic capabilities akin to those available with hardening descriptions for plasticity models in LAME. Specifically, multiple different (including user-defined) shift-factor forms are implemented with each being easily selected via parameter specification rather than requiring distinct material models.

Accurate and efficient constitutive modeling remains a cornerstone issue for solid mechanics analysis. Over the years, the LAME advanced material model library has grown to address this challenge by implementing models capable of describing material systems spanning soft polymers to stiff ceramics including both isotropic and anisotropic responses. Inelastic behaviors including (visco)plasticity, damage, and fracture have all incorporated for use in various analyses. This multitude of options and flexibility, however, comes at the cost of many capabilities, features, and responses and the ensuing complexity in the resulting implementation. Therefore, to enhance confidence and enable the utilization of the LAME library in application, this effort seeks to document and verify the various models in the LAME library. Specifically, the broader strategy, organization, and interface of the library itself is first presented. The physical theory, numerical implementation, and user guide for a large set of models is then discussed. Importantly, a number of verification tests are performed with each model to not only have confidence in the model itself but also highlight some important response characteristics and features that may be of interest to end-users. Finally, in looking ahead to the future, approaches to add material models to this library and further expand the capabilities are presented.

Plastic deformations in metals are dissipative. Some fraction of the dissipated mechanical energy (plastic work) is converted into thermal energy and serves as a heat source. In cases where the heat cannot be readily transferred to the environment, the local temperature will increase thereby producing variations in mechanical behaviors associated with temperature-dependent properties (e.g. thermal softening due to decreasing yield strengths). This issue is often referred to as "adiabatic heating as an adiabatic temperature condition corresponds to the limiting case where no heat transfer takes place. The impact of converting plastic work into heat on the mechanical response of metals has been long studied. Nonetheless, it still remains an issue. For instance, with respect to ductile failure, the second Sandia Fracture Challenge noted that accounting for plastic heat generation was necessary for predictions under dynamic loading conditions. Furthermore, both experimental and modeling efforts continue to be pursued to better describe and understand the effect of plastic work conversion into heat on structural responses. Noting the need for capturing plastic work conversion into heat in structural analyses, a simple and fairly traditional representation of these responses has been added into existing modular plasticity models in the Library of Advanced Materials for Engineering (LAME). Here, these capabilities are briefly described with the underlying theory and numerical implementation discussed in Sections 2 and 3, respectively. Examples of syntax are given in Section 4 and some verification exercises are found in Section 5. Simple structural analyses are presented in Section 6 to briefly highlight the impact of these features and concluding thoughts are given.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

An initial foray into the design of specimens that can be used to provide data about the quasistatic ductile failure of metals when subjected to shear-dominated (low triaxiality) states of stress was undertaken. Four specimen geometries made from two materials with different ductility (Al 7075, lower ductility and steel A286, higher ductility) were considered as candidates. Based on results from analysis and experimentation, it seems that two show promise for further consideration. Whereas preliminary results indicate that the Johnson-Cook model fit the failure data for Al 7075 well, it did not fit the data for steel A286. Further work is needed to consolidate the results and evaluate other failure models that may fit the steel data better, as well as to extend the results of this work to the dynamic loading regime.

Accurate and efficient constitutive modeling remains a cornerstone issue for solid mechanics analysis. Over the years, the LAMÉ advanced material model library has grown to address this challenge by implementing models capable of describing material systems spanning soft polymers to stiff ceramics including both isotropic and anisotropic responses. Inelastic behaviors including (visco)plasticity, damage, and fracture have all incorporated for use in various analyses. This multitude of options and flexibility, however, comes at the cost of many capabilities, features, and responses and the ensuing complexity in the resulting implementation. Therefore, to enhance confidence and enable the utilization of the LAMÉ library in application, this effort seeks to document and verify the various models in the LAMÉ library. Specifically, the broader strategy, organization, and interface of the library itself is first presented. The physical theory, numerical implementation, and user guide for a large set of models is then discussed. Importantly, a number of verification tests are performed with each model to not only have confidence in the model itself but also highlight some important response characteristics and features that may be of interest to end-users. Finally, in looking ahead to the future, approaches to add material models to this library and further expand the capabilities are presented.

Accurate modeling of viscoelasticity remains an important consideration for a variety of materials (e.g. polymers and inorganic glasses). As such, over the previous decades a substantial body of work has been dedicated to developing appropriate constitutive models for viscoelasticity ranging from initial considerations of linear thermoviscoelasticity to more complex non-linear formulations incorporating fictive temperatures or potential energy clocks including the use of both internal state variable(ISV) and hereditary integral representations. Nonetheless, relatively limited (in comparison to plasticity) attention has been paid to the numerical integration of such schemes. In terms of integral based formulations, Taylor et al. first considered the problem of the integration of a linear viscoelasticity model. That work focused on the integration of the hereditary integrals and demonstrated improved performance of the new scheme with a custom finite element code over an existing finite difference reference. Chambers and Becker, using a free volume based shift factor, also considered the integration of the hereditary integrals and the impact on the problem of a pressurized thick-walled cylinder and developed an adaptive scheme to bound the error. Chambers later developed three-point Gauss and composite integration schemes for the hereditary integrals and noted improved accuracy. With respect to ISV-based schemes, formulations for the non-linear Schapery model have been proposed. However, in those efforts greater attention was paid to convergence of the non-linear solution scheme than impact of numerical integration. Various authors (e.g. Holzapfel and Simo and Hughes) have also studied the use of convolution integrals with differential forms of ISVs for temperature-independent formulations. Regardless, while the "potential energy clock" (PEC) and "simplified potential energy clock"(SPEC) models have been used to study a variety of non-linear responses (e.g.), limited attention has been paid to the numerical performance. As will be discussed later, the "clock" at the center of the formulations includes temperature and complex history dependence making the numerical integration of such a model even more challenging. Thus, in the current work an initial effort towards characterizing the numerical integration of the constitutive model through simplified problems is performed. To that end, in Section 2 the theory of the model is briefly presented while the numerical integration is discussed in Section 3. Results of various studies characterizing the numerical behavior and performance are then given in Section 4. Finally, some concluding remarks and thoughts for follow on works are provided in Section 5.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Computational prediction of ductile failure remains a challenging and important problem as demonstrated by the recent Sandia Fracture Challenges. In addition to emphasizing the complexity of such problems, the variety of solution strategies also highlighted the number of possible approaches to this problem. A common engineering approach for such efforts is to use a failure model in conjunction with element deletion. In the second Sandia Fracture Challenge, for instance, nine of the fourteen teams used some form of element deletion. For such schemes, a critical decision pertains to the selection of the appropriate failure model; of which many may be found in the literature (see the review of Corona and Reedlunn). The variety may also be observed in the aforementioned second Sandia Fracture Challenge in which at least eight different failure criteria are listed for the nine element deletion based approaches. The selection of the appropriate failure model is a difficult challenge depending on the material being considered and such criteria can variously depend on stress state (i.e. triaxiality, Lode angle) and loading conditions (i.e. strain rate, temperature). Separate implementations of each criteria with different plasticity models can be a repetitive and cumbersome process which may limit available models for an engineering analyst. To mitigate this issue, an effort was pursued to flexibly implement failure models in which different failure models could be specified and utilized within the same elastic-plastic constitutive routine by simply changing the input syntax. Similarly, the same models are implemented across a suite of elastic-plastic formulations enabling consistent definitions. As will be discussed later, a specific "modular failure" model is also implemented which allows for the selection or specification of different dependencies depending on the current need. At this stage, this effort is limited to defining failure models; progression/damage evolution in the constitutive model is not treated and left to future efforts.

Glass-ceramics are a unique class of materials in which the growth of a ceramic phase(s) may be induced in an inorganic glass resulting in a microstructurally heterogeneous material with both glass and ceramic phases. This specialized processing is often referred to as "ceramming''. A wide variety of such materials have been developed through the use of different initial glass compositions and thermomechanical processing routes and that have enabled applications in dentistry, consumer kitchenware, and telescopes mirrors. These materials may also exhibit large apparent coefficients of thermal expansion making them attractive for consideration in glass-ceramic seals. These large apparent coefficients of thermal expansion often arise from silica polymorphs, such as cristobalite, undergoing a solid-to-solid phase transformations producing additional non-linearity in the effective material response.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

A variety of recent work has expanded capabilities in LAMÉ with respect to anisotropic and modular plasticity model. In this context, modular refers to a flexible framework and consistent implementation such that different hardening functional forms may all be incorporated into the same material model implementation rather than needing a new model for each description. However, such work has been focused on three-dimensional formulations and limited attention has been paid to structural formulations; i.e. for use with beam or shell elements. As a first step to bringing some of these recent advances towards structural elements, modular isotropic hardening capabilities will be added to the J2 von Mises plane-stress plasticity formulation of Simo and Taylor. To accomplish this effort, in Section 2 and 3 the theory and numerical formulation of the model are given. Specific functional forms of the hardening and example syntax to use them are then presented in Section 4 while verification exercises are documented in Section 5. Finally, some concluding thoughts about future work are given in Section 6.

Accurate and efficient constitutive modeling remains a cornerstone issue for solid mechanics analysis. Over the years, the LAME advanced material model library has grown to address this challenge by implementing models capable of describing material systems spanning soft polymers to stiff ceramics including both isotropic and anisotropic responses. Inelastic behaviors including (visco)plasticity, damage, and fracture have all incorporated for use in various analyses. This multitude of options and flexibility, however, comes at the cost of many capabilities, features, and responses and the ensuing complexity in the resulting implementation. Therefore, to enhance confidence and enable the utilization of the LAME library in application, this effort seeks to document and verify the various models in the LAME library. Specifically, the broader strategy, organization, and interface of the library itself is first presented. The physical theory, numerical implementation, and user guide for a large set of models is then discussed. Importantly, a number of verification tests are performed with each model to not only have confidence in the model itself but also highlight some important response characteristics and features that may be of interest to end-users. Finally, in looking ahead to the future, approaches to add material models to this library and further expand the capabilities are presented.

Abstract not provided.