Publications

Results 1–25 of 117

Search results

Jump to search filters

MADmax: Multi-agent Trust Dynamics and Influence Maximization

Springer Proceedings in Complexity

Sorensen, Asael H.; Sweitzer, Matthew D.; Naugle, Asmeret; Doyle, Casey L.; Krofcheck, Daniel J.

Influence in the post social media, world-is-flat online social landscape, has gone through an apocalypse level transformation. Trust, the critical component for social cohesion, now develops in a vastly different context from most of human history. We present MADmax, a multi-agent opinion dynamics simulation that utilizes reinforcement learning to evaluate influence strategies in trust-driven social networks. The simulation incorporates a real-world calibrated system dynamics trust model to mediate influence in an agent-based model (ABM) that simulates the evolution of opinions. We employ multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) to discover and evaluate influence strategies. Agents collaborate on influence teams, and results offer insight into intra-team competition and inter-team coordination. Additionally, we identify possible indicators of influence campaigns, such as increases in extremism.

More Details

What is (quantitative) system dynamics modeling? Defining characteristics and the opportunities they create

System Dynamics Review

Naugle, Asmeret; Langarudi, Saeed; Clancy, Timothy

A clear definition of system dynamics modeling can provide shared understanding and clarify the impact of the field. We introduce a set of characteristics that define quantitative system dynamics, selected to capture core philosophy, describe theoretical and practical principles, and apply to historical work but be flexible enough to remain relevant as the field progresses. The defining characteristics are: (1) models are based on causal feedback structure, (2) accumulations and delays are foundational, (3) models are equation-based, (4) concept of time is continuous, and (5) analysis focuses on feedback dynamics. We discuss the implications of these principles and use them to identify research opportunities in which the system dynamics field can advance. These research opportunities include causality, disaggregation, data science and AI, and contributing to scientific advancement. Progress in these areas has the potential to improve both the science and practice of system dynamics. © 2024 The Authors. System Dynamics Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of System Dynamics Society.

More Details

What can simulation test beds teach us about social science? Results of the ground truth program

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory

Naugle, Asmeret; Krofcheck, Daniel J.; Warrender, Christina E.; Lakkaraju, Kiran; Swiler, Laura P.; Verzi, Stephen J.; Emery, Benjamin; Murdock, Jaimie; Bernard, Michael; Romero, Vicente J.

The ground truth program used simulations as test beds for social science research methods. The simulations had known ground truth and were capable of producing large amounts of data. This allowed research teams to run experiments and ask questions of these simulations similar to social scientists studying real-world systems, and enabled robust evaluation of their causal inference, prediction, and prescription capabilities. We tested three hypotheses about research effectiveness using data from the ground truth program, specifically looking at the influence of complexity, causal understanding, and data collection on performance. We found some evidence that system complexity and causal understanding influenced research performance, but no evidence that data availability contributed. The ground truth program may be the first robust coupling of simulation test beds with an experimental framework capable of teasing out factors that determine the success of social science research.

More Details

Feedback density and causal complexity of simulation model structure

Journal of Simulation

Naugle, Asmeret; Verzi, Stephen J.; Lakkaraju, Kiran; Swiler, Laura P.; Warrender, Christina E.; Bernard, Michael; Romero, Vicente J.

Measures of simulation model complexity generally focus on outputs; we propose measuring the complexity of a model’s causal structure to gain insight into its fundamental character. This article introduces tools for measuring causal complexity. First, we introduce a method for developing a model’s causal structure diagram, which characterises the causal interactions present in the code. Causal structure diagrams facilitate comparison of simulation models, including those from different paradigms. Next, we develop metrics for evaluating a model’s causal complexity using its causal structure diagram. We discuss cyclomatic complexity as a measure of the intricacy of causal structure and introduce two new metrics that incorporate the concept of feedback, a fundamental component of causal structure. The first new metric introduced here is feedback density, a measure of the cycle-based interconnectedness of causal structure. The second metric combines cyclomatic complexity and feedback density into a comprehensive causal complexity measure. Finally, we demonstrate these complexity metrics on simulation models from multiple paradigms and discuss potential uses and interpretations. These tools enable direct comparison of models across paradigms and provide a mechanism for measuring and discussing complexity based on a model’s fundamental assumptions and design.

More Details

Conflicting Information and Compliance With COVID-19 Behavioral Recommendations

Naugle, Asmeret; Rothganger, Fredrick R.; Verzi, Stephen J.; Doyle, Casey L.

The prevalence of COVID-19 is shaped by behavioral responses to recommendations and warnings. Available information on the disease determines the population’s perception of danger and thus its behavior; this information changes dynamically, and different sources may report conflicting information. We study the feedback between disease, information, and stay-at-home behavior using a hybrid agent-based-system dynamics model that incorporates evolving trust in sources of information. We use this model to investigate how divergent reporting and conflicting information can alter the trajectory of a public health crisis. The model shows that divergent reporting not only alters disease prevalence over time, but also increases polarization of the population’s behaviors and trust in different sources of information.

More Details
Results 1–25 of 117
Results 1–25 of 117
Top