Additive manufacturing (AM) processes, like 3D printing, help to facilitate complex and customizable battery geometries which can provide design freedom and enhance volumetric energy density within electronic devices. AM materials must have the thermal and mechanical properties that enable printability, and when used in batteries, AM materials must also be chemically and electrochemically compatible with the battery chemistry. The compatibility between AM materials and the battery is of particular importance for the cell packaging materials which must be inert and are often overlooked. This study systematically studies AM-compatible polymeric materials for use as gaskets in lithium-ion cells. The materials investigated include three thermoplastics suitable for material extrusion printing: polylactic acid (PLA), polycarbonate, and polypropylene/polyethylene copolymer (PPPEC); and two photoresins suitable for vat photopolymerization (VPP) printing: an acrylate-based photoresin and a polyethylene glycol diacrylate photoresin. The AM gasket materials were tested in comparison to a conventional commercial polypropylene gasket. Mechanical testing (swell measurements and material stiffness) and electrochemical testing (linear sweep voltammetry and galvanostatic cycling of full cells) demonstrated that PLA and the VPP polymers were the least compatible with the lithium-ion battery chemistry, despite their prevalent use in studies of AM batteries, and that PPPEC was the most compatible.
Enchinton, Abraham; Martinez, Ana C.; Gonzalez, Katherine R.; Fernandez, Christian A.; Balivada, Sivasai; Merrill, Laura C.; Cardenas, Jorge A.; Maurel, Alexis
Appearing as one of the key-components of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), this work specifically focuses on the additive manufacturing (AM) of custom-shape separators, facilitated by the filament material extrusion process, also called fused deposition modeling (FDM). The development and optimization of composite thermoplastic filament feedstocks combining polypropylene and paraffin wax, followed by the 3D printing of the separator membranes is shown. A post-processing step, based on thermal induced phase separation (TIPS), is introduced to promote porosity formation through removal of the paraffin wax sacrificial phase within the 3D printed items. Separators with different polypropylene/paraffin wax ratios are developed and the impact on printability, mechanical strength, porosity, and electrochemical performances, is thoroughly discussed. X-ray micro-computed tomography is employed to assess the geometric fidelity and to detect printing defects in a complex 3D lattice structure. The performance of the 3D printed porous separators is also compared to a commercial separator. This pioneering research establishes a foundation for the creation of porous separators that can adapt to and conform into 3D printed battery architectures with novel form factors, and also creates opportunities for the use of FDM and TIPS for a wide range of applications that employ porous structures beyond the energy storage field.
Custom-form factor batteries fabricated in non-conventional shapes can maximize the overall energy density of the systems they power, particularly when used in conjunction with energy dense materials (e.g., Li metal anodes and conversion cathodes). Additive manufacturing (AM), and specifically material extrusion (ME), have been shown as effective methods for producing custom-form cell components, particularly electrodes. However, the AM of several promising energy dense materials (conversion electrodes such as iron trifluoride) have yet to be demonstrated or optimized. Furthermore, the integration of multiple AM produced cell components, such as electrodes and separators, along with a custom package remains largely unexplored. In this work, iron trifluoride (FeF3) and ionogel (IG) separators are conformally printed using ME onto non-planar surfaces to enable the fabrication of custom-form Li-FeF3 batteries. To demonstrate printing on non-planar surfaces, cathodes and separators were deposited onto cylindrical rods using a 5-axis ME printer. ME printed FeF3 was shown to have performance commensurate with FeF3 cast using conventional means, both in coin cell and cylindrical rod formats, with capacities exceeding 700 mAh/g on the first cycle and ranging between 600 and 400 mAh/g over the next 50 cycles. Additionally, a ME process for printing polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene (PVDF-HFP) based IGs directly onto FeF3 is developed and enabled using an electrolyte exchange process. In coin cells, this process is shown to produce cells with similar capacity to cells built with Celgard separators out to 50 cycles, with the exception that cycling instabilities are observed during cycles 8–20. When using printed and exchanged IGs in a custom cylindrical cell package, 6 stable high-capacity cycles are achieved. Overall, this work demonstrates approaches for producing high-energy-density Li-FeF3 cells in coin and cylindrical rod formats, which are translatable to customized, arbitrary geometries compatible with ME printing and electrolyte exchange.
Frontal polymerization involves the propagation of a thermally driven polymerization wave through a monomer solution to rapidly generate high-performance polymeric materials with little energy input. The balance between latent catalyst activation and sufficient reactivity to sustain a front can be difficult to achieve and often results in systems with poor storage lives. This is of particular concern for frontal ring-opening metathesis polymerization (FROMP) where gelation occurs within a single day of resin preparation due to the highly reactive nature of Grubbs-type catalysts. In this report we demonstrate the use of encapsulated catalysts to provide remarkable latency to frontal polymerization systems, specifically using the highly active dicyclopentadiene monomer system. Negligible differences were observed in the frontal velocities or thermomechanical properties of the resulting polymeric materials. FROMP systems with encapsulated catalyst particles are shown with storage lives exceeding 12 months and front rates that increase over a well-characterized 2 month period. Moreover, the modularity of this encapsulation method is demonstrated by encapsulating a platinum catalyst for the frontal polymerization of silicones by using hydrosilylation chemistry.
The solution processability of ionogel solid electrolytes has recently garnered attention in the Li-ion battery community as a means to address the interface and fabrication issues commonly associated with most solid electrolytes. However, the trapped ionic liquid (ILE) component has hindered the electrochemical performance. Herein, we present a process to tune the properties by replacing the ILE in a silica-based ionogel after fabrication with a liquid component befitting the desired application. Electrochemical cycling under various conditions showcases gels containing different liquid components incorporated into LiFePO4 (LFP)/gel/Li cells: high power (455 W kg-1 at a 1 C discharge) systems using carbonates, low temperatures (-40 °C) using ethers, or high temperatures (100 °C) using ionic liquids. Fabrication of additive-manufactured cells utilizing the exchanged carbonate-based system is demonstrated in a planar LFP/Li4Ti5O12 (LTO) system, where a marked improvement over an ionogel is found in terms of rate capability, capacity, and cycle stability (118 vs 41 mA h g-1 at C/4). This process represents a promising route to create a separator-less cell, potentially in complex architectures, where the electrolyte properties can be facilely tuned to meet the required conditions for a wide range of battery chemistries while maintaining a uniform electrolyte access throughout cast electrodes.