Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Invited for this month's cover is the joint redox flow battery team from Sandia and Los Alamos National Laboratories. The cover image shows the stylized components of a redox flow battery (RFB) in the foreground, with renewable sources of energy generation in the background. The Review itself is available at 10.1002/cssc.202002354.

Abstract not provided.

Non-aqueous redox flow batteries (RFBs) offer the possibility of higher voltage and a wider working temperature range than their aqueous counterpart. Here, we optimize the established 2.26 V Fe(bpy)3(BF4)2/Ni(bpy)3(BF4)2 asymmetric RFB to lessen capacity fade and improve energy efficiency over 20 cycles. We also prepared a family of substituted Fe(bpyR)3(BF4)2 complexes (R = -CF3, -CO2Me, -Br, -H, -tBu, -Me, -OMe, -NH2) to potentially achieve a higher voltage RFB by systematically tuning the redox potential of Fe(bpyR)3(BF4)2, from 0.94 V vs. Ag/AgCl for R = OMe to 1.65 V vs. Ag/AgCl for R = CF3 (ΔV = 0.7 V). A series of electronically diverse symmetric and asymmetric RFBs were compared and contrasted to study electroactive species stability and efficiency, in which the unsubstituted Fe(bpy)3(BF4)2 exhibited the highest stability as a catholyte in both symmetric and asymmetric cells with voltage and coulombic efficiencies of 94.0% and 96.5%, and 90.7% and 80.7%, respectively.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.