This project addresses the following technical barriers from the Safety, Codes and Standards section of the 2012 Fuel Cell Technologies Office Multi-Year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan (section 3.8): (A) Safety data and information: limited access and availability (F) Enabling national and international markets requires consistent RCS (G) Insufficient technical data to revise standards.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Sandia National Laboratories evaluated published safety assessment methods across a variety of industries including Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), hydrogen, land and marine transportation, as well as the US Department of Defense (DOD). All the methods were evaluated for their potential applicability for use in the LNG railroad application. After reviewing the documents included in this report, as well as others not included because of repetition, the Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Safety Plan Checklist is most suitable to be adapted to the LNG railroad application. This report was developed to survey industries related to rail transportation for methodologies and tools that can be used by the FRA to review and evaluate safety assessments submitted by the railroad industry as a part of their implementation plans for liquefied or compressed natural gas storage ( on-board or tender) and engine fueling delivery systems. The main sections of this report provide an overview of various methods found during this survey. In most cases, the reference document is quoted directly. The final section provides discussion and a recommendation for the most appropriate methodology that will allow efficient and consistent evaluations to be made. The DOE Hydrogen Safety Plan Checklist was then revised to adapt it as a methodology for the Federal Railroad Administration’s use in evaluating safety plans submitted by the railroad industry.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
This report presents the results of a series of cable fire-retardant coating tests sponsored by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research and performed at Sandia National Laboratories in conjunction with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The goal of the tests was to assess the effects of three commercially available fire-retardant cable coating materials on cable thermal and electrical response behavior under fire-exposure conditions. The specific test objectives were to assess, under severe radiant heating conditions, how the coating materials impacted (1) cable thermal response and (2) electrical integrity behavior. The tests were not explicitly designed to assess the impact of the coatings on cable flammability, although some insights relative to the burning behavior of the coating materials themselves and cable ignition times were gained. NIST is currently investigating these attributes under the Cable Heat Release, Ignition, and Spread in Tray Installations During Fire (CHRISTIEFIRE) program (NUREG/CR-7010). The cables used in construction of the test articles were all seven-conductor 12AWG (American wire gage) control or power type copper conductor electrical cables. Two cable insulation types were represented, a polyethylene thermoplastic material and a cross-linked polyethylene thermoset material. Both cable types used have been tested extensively in recent NRC-sponsored experimental programs involving both circuit failure modes and effects testing and fire growth testing. The test articles included uncoated cables and cables coated with one of three fire-retardant coating materials: Carboline Intumastic 285, Flamemastic F-77, and Vimasco 3i. Test configurations included single lengths of cables, bundles of seven cables, and bundles of ten cables. The tests show that, under certain conditions, the fire-retardant coatings provide a substantial benefit relative to delays in cable heating, ignition and electrical failure times. However, as has been seen in prior test programs, the performance varied substantially among the coating products. The current tests also show that the benefit gained by the coatings was heavily dependent on the thermal mass of the coated cable system. Low thermal mass systems, such as the single lengths of coated cable, saw essentially no net benefit from application of the coatings. Intermediate mass systems, represented by the seven-cable bundles, saw some benefit from application of the coatings, but the benefit was inconsistent, and some cables in the bundles saw essentially no delay in thermal response or time to failure. For the larger thermal mass systems, represented by the ten-cable bundles, the benefit of the coatings was both more pronounced and more consistent with all coatings providing a measurable benefit.
Automakers and fuel providers have made public commitments to commercialize light duty fuel cell electric vehicles and fueling infrastructure in select US regions beginning in 2014. The development, implementation, and advancement of meaningful codes and standards is critical to enable the effective deployment of clean and efficient fuel cell and hydrogen solutions in the energy technology marketplace. Metrics pertaining to the development and implementation of safety knowledge, codes, and standards are important to communicate progress and inform future R&D investments. This document describes the development and benchmarking of metrics specific to the development of hydrogen specific codes relevant for hydrogen refueling stations. These metrics will be most useful as the hydrogen fuel market transitions from pre-commercial to early-commercial phases. The target regions in California will serve as benchmarking case studies to quantify the success of past investments in research and development supporting safety codes and standards R&D.
Safety standards development for maintenance facilities of liquid and compressed gas fueled large-scale vehicles is required to ensure proper facility design and operation envelopes. Standard development organizations are utilizing risk-informed concepts to develop natural gas vehicle (NGV) codes and standards so that maintenance facilities meet acceptable risk levels. The present report summarizes Phase I work for existing NGV repair facility code requirements and highlights inconsistencies that need quantitative analysis into their effectiveness. A Hazardous and Operability study was performed to identify key scenarios of interest. Finally, scenario analyses were performed using detailed simulations and modeling to estimate the overpressure hazards from HAZOP defined scenarios. The results from Phase I will be used to identify significant risk contributors at NGV maintenance facilities, and are expected to form the basis for follow-on quantitative risk analysis work to address specific code requirements and identify effective accident prevention and mitigation strategies.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.