BeyondFingerprinting was a 2021-2024 Sandia Grand Challenge LDRD exploring the potential to develop new resilient materials and manufacturing processes by taking an artificial-intelligence (AI)-guided approach that integrates human-subject-matter expertise with algorithms enriched with physics-based constraints to unearth process-structure-property correlations. Such algorithms, trained on high-throughput experiments and simulations, are shown to serve as surrogate models that efficiently detect key “fingerprints” in materials data, prognose material performance, and guide effective process improvements. To accelerate broader adoption across mission areas, this AI-guided approach was demonstrated with three complex process-centric exemplars: electroplating, physical vapor deposition, and laser powder bed fusion. Together, these exemplars impact nearly every hardware component relevant to DOE and NNSA national security missions.
Future machine learning strategies for materials process optimization will likely replace human capital-intensive artisan research with autonomous and/or accelerated approaches. Such automation enables accelerated multimodal characterization that simultaneously minimizes human errors, lowers costs, enhances statistical sampling, and allows scientists to allocate their time to critical thinking instead of repetitive manual tasks. Previous acceleration efforts to synthesize and evaluate materials have often employed elaborate robotic self-driving laboratories or used specialized strategies that are difficult to generalize. Herein we describe an implemented workflow for accelerating the multimodal characterization of a combinatorial set of 915 electroplated Ni and Ni–Fe thin films resulting in a data cube with over 160,000 individual data files. Our acceleration strategies do not require manufacturing-scale resources and are thus amenable to typical materials research facilities in academic, government, or commercial laboratories. The workflow demonstrated the acceleration of six characterization modalities: optical microscopy, laser profilometry, X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, nanoindentation, and tribological (friction and wear) testing, each with speedup factors ranging from 13–46x. In addition, automated data upload to a repository using FAIR data principles was accelerated by 64x.
Machine learning is on a bit of a tear right now, with advances that are infiltrating nearly every aspect of our lives. In the domain of materials science, this wave seems to be growing into a tsunami. Yet, there are still real hurdles that we face to maximize its benefit. This Matter of Opinion, crafted as a result of a workshop hosted by researchers at Sandia National Laboratories and attended by a cadre of luminaries, briefly summarizes our perspective on these barriers. By recognizing these problems in a community forum, we can share the burden of their resolution together with a common purpose and coordinated effort.
Artificial solid electrolyte interphases have provided a path to improved cycle life for high energy density, next-generation anodes like lithium metal. Although long cycle life is necessary for widespread implementation, understanding and mitigating the effects of aging and self-discharge are also required. Here, we investigate several coating materials and their role in calendar life aging of lithium. We find that the oxide coatings are electronically passivating whereas the LiF coating slows charge transfer kinetics. Furthermore, the Coulombic loss during self-discharge measurements improves with the oxide layers and worsens with the LiF layer. It is found that none of the coatings create a continuous conformal, electronically passivating layer on top of the deposited lithium nor are they likely to distribute evenly through a porous deposit, suggesting that none of the materials are acting as an artificial solid electrolyte interphase. Instead, they likely alter performance through modulating lithium nucleation and growth.
