Publications

Abstract not provided.

Diazonium compounds are synthetically useful in the production of dyes and textiles, however they are highly explosive under dry conditions. Explosion prevention becomes more difficult when new diazonium compounds are synthesized, because while some syntheses include a counterion to increase their stability, this is not always a reliable method to prevent an explosive incident. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the explosiveness of different diazonium compounds, it is important to understand how to safely clean up after an incident and how to determine when it is safe to return a laboratory to typical operational use, particularly when the incident involves a novel compound where a standard does not exist for instrument calibration. Here, an explosive event is discussed involving the synthesis of 4-bromo-benzenediazonium-2-carboxylate. Following the explosive incident and 3-step cleanup, which involved a precautionary neutralization step, samples were collected from the fume hood where the incident occurred. Because the incident involved an unstable, novel compound that is not commercially available and was deemed unsafe to resynthesize for instrument calibration, we assessed the risk of further explosion by analyzing for the stable decomposition products. Mass spectrometry analysis confirmed that the residue in the fume hood contained 5-bromosalicylic acid, a decomposition product of 4-bromo-benzenediazonium-2-carboxylate. Samples were taken from multiple points in the fume hood and analyzed to estimate the spatial distribution of the decomposition product. Based on this analysis, we inferred that the primary decomposition product was far more abundant than residual energetic, indicating the energetic had been consumed or neutralized to a trace quantity where the risk of further explosion was low. The steps presented here─specifically, initial neutralization and then analyzing the spatial distribution of expected decomposition products to assess risk when a novel explosive material is detonated in a confined space─were our approach to assess further risk following an explosion due to a novel diazonium compound without the need for any further handling or resynthesis of the energetic. Here, we present our approach and critically analyze these steps by discussing retrospective lessons learned and alternative analytical approaches.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Thermoset polymers (e.g. epoxies, vulcanizable rubbers, polyurethanes, etc.) are crosslinked materials with excellent thermal, chemical, and mechanical stability; these properties make thermoset materials attractive for use in harsh applications and environments. Unfortunately, material robustness means that these materials persist in the environment with very slow degradation over long periods of time. Balancing the benefits of material performance with sustainability is a challenge in need of novel solutions. Here, we aimed to address this challenge by incorporating boronic acid-amine complexes into epoxy thermoset chemistries, facilitating degradation of the material under pH neutral to alkaline conditions; in this scenario, water acts as an initiator to remove boron species, creating a porous structure with an enhanced surface area that makes the material more amenable to environmental degradation. Furthermore, the expulsion of the boron leaves the residual pores rich in amines which can be exploited for CO₂ absorption or other functionalization. We demonstrated the formation of novel boron species from neat mixing of amine compounds with boric acid, including one complex that appears highly stable under nitrogen atmosphere up to 600 °C. While degradation of the materials under static, alkaline conditions (our “trigger”) was inconclusive at the time of this writing, dynamic conditions appeared more promising. Additionally, we showed that increasing boronic acid content created materials more resistant to thermal degradation, thus improving performance under typical high temperature use conditions.

Alkali metals, such as lithium, sodium, potassium, etc., are highly reactive elements. While researchers generally handle these metals with caution, less caution is taken when these elements have been “reacted”. In this work, a recent incident is examined in which a pair of researchers ignited a lithium silicide alloy sample that was assumed to be fully hydrated to lithium hydroxide and, thereby, no longer water-reactive. However, variations in the original chemical composition of the lithium compounds examined resulted in select mixtures failing to hydrate and react completely to lithium hydroxide in the time frame allowed. This gave rise to residual unreacted, water-sensitive lithium silicide which resulted in a violent exothermic reaction with water and autoignition of the produced hydrogen gas. This Article describes this incident and improvements that can be implemented to prevent similar incidents from occurring.