Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Global wildfire events have had increasingly severe impacts in recent years, particularly in the western USA, driven by extreme fire-weather conditions, fuel accumulation and multiple ignition sources. Wildfires sparked by power lines tend to be larger and more destructive, as they often occur during high winds, which accelerate the spread of fires. Moreover, efforts to contain wildfires frequently result in power outages, causing considerable economic disruption. Here, in this Review, we examine wildfire risks related to power-line-induced ignitions, infrastructure damage, climate-induced environmental impacts, grid operational risks, real-time grid management risks, vegetation management risks, and financial and funding risks in the context of a changing climate and their interdependence with power grid infrastructures. We then explore the resilience of power grids under wildfire threats, looking at risk analysis, prediction and mitigation strategies. The Review also shares practical insights and experiences in the USA to inform researchers, policymakers and industry professionals.

A poster summarizing parts of Sandia National Labs Wildfire Electric Grid Resilience program

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Traditionally, electric grid planning seeks to maintain safe, reliable, efficient, and affordable service for current and future customers. As policies, expectations of the energy system, and the threat landscape evolve, additional objectives for power system planners are emerging, including decarbonization, resilience, and equity. Renewable and clean energy goals, especially in the context of deep decarbonization strategies, are changing the mix of resources on the electric grid and prompting new considerations for grid architecture. The increased frequency and severity of extreme weather events over the last two decades, coupled with cybersecurity concerns, have elevated resilience as a key system need. More recently, there has been greater focus on equity and energy justice in grid planning to ensure that disadvantaged communities are not adversely affected by grid modernization and have equal access to its benefits. In response, new thinking around multi-objective decision planning is exploring improvements in grid planning processes to better integrate approaches to meet decarbonization, resilience, and equity objectives. To provide a foundation for this work, a series of white papers was produced to summarize these emerging objectives.

Traditionally, electric grid planning seeks to maintain safe, reliable, efficient, and affordable service for current and future customers. As policies, expectations of the energy system, and the threat landscape evolve, additional objectives for power system planners are emerging, including decarbonization, resilience, and equity. Renewable and clean energy goals, especially in the context of deep decarbonization strategies, are changing the mix of resources on the electric grid and prompting new considerations for grid architecture. The increased frequency and severity of extreme weather events over the last two decades, coupled with cybersecurity concerns, have elevated resilience as a key system need. More recently, there has been greater focus on equity and energy justice in grid planning to ensure that disadvantaged communities are not adversely affected by grid modernization and have equal access to its benefits. In response, new thinking around multi-objective decision planning is exploring improvements in grid planning processes to better integrate approaches to meet decarbonization, resilience, and equity objectives. To provide a foundation for this work, a series of white papers was produced to summarize these emerging objectives.

Traditionally, electric grid planning seeks to maintain safe, reliable, efficient, and affordable service for current and future customers. As policies, expectations of the energy system, and the threat landscape evolve, additional objectives for power system planners are emerging, including decarbonization, resilience, and equity. Renewable and clean energy goals, especially in the context of deep decarbonization strategies, are changing the mix of resources on the electric grid and prompting new considerations for grid architecture. The increased frequency and severity of extreme weather events over the last two decades, coupled with cybersecurity concerns, have elevated resilience as a key system need. More recently, there has been greater focus on equity and energy justice in grid planning to ensure that disadvantaged communities are not adversely affected by grid modernization and have equal access to its benefits. In response, new thinking around multi-objective decision planning is exploring improvements in grid planning processes to better integrate approaches to meet decarbonization, resilience, and equity objectives. To provide a foundation for this work, a series of white papers was produced to summarize these emerging objectives.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Traditionally electric grid planning strives to maintain safe, reliable, efficient, and affordable service for current and future customers. As policies, social preferences, and the threat landscape evolve, additional considerations for power system planners are emerging, including decarbonization, resilience, and energy equity and justice. The MOD-Plan framework leverages and extends prior work to provide a framework for integrating incorporating resilience, equity, and decarbonization into integrated distribution system planning.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

We present a procedure for randomly generating realistic steady-state contingency scenarios based on the historical outage data from a particular event. First, we divide generation into classes and fit a probability distribution of outage magnitude for each class. Second, we provide a method for randomly synthesizing generator resilience levels in a way that preserves the data-driven probability distributions of outage magnitude. Finally, we devise a simple method of scaling the storm effects based on a single global parameter. We apply our methods using data from historical Winter Storm Uri to simulate contingency events for the ACTIVSg2000 synthetic grid on the footprint of Texas.

We propose a two-stage scenario-based stochastic optimization problem to determine investments that enhance power system resilience. The proposed optimization problem minimizes the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) of load loss to target low-probability high-impact events. We provide results in the context of generator winterization investments in Texas using winter storm scenarios generated from historical data collected from Winter Storm Uri. Results illustrate how the CVaR metric can be used to minimize the tail of the distribution of load loss and illustrate how risk-Aversity impacts investment decisions.

The goal of this work is to identify critical nodes in a bulk electric system for grid resilience to a specified threat. We present a cascading outage framework and an analytical framework for identifying electric grid failure trends and critical components. We create thousands of threat scenarios to be modeled in a dynamic electric grid cascading outage model. Each threat scenario determines which major grid components are removed from service due to the threat. The cascading outage model runs transient dynamic simulations which allow for secondary transients to affect the relays/protection leading to cascading outages. The results of the cascading model feed an analytics model to identify trends and critical components whose failure is more likely to cause serious systemic effects. Information on which system components are most critical to electric grid resilience can significantly assist grid planning and reduce grid consequences of large-scale disasters.

In the face of increasing natural disasters and an aging grid, utilities need to optimally choose investments to the existing infrastructure to promote resiliency. This paper presents a new investment decision optimization model to minimize unserved load over the recovery time and improve grid resilience to extreme weather event scenarios. Our optimization model includes a network power flow model which decides generator status and generator dispatch, optimal transmission switching (OTS) during the multi-time period recovery process, and an investment decision model subject to a given budget. Investment decisions include the hardening of transmission lines, generators, and substations. Our model uses a second order cone programming (SOCP) relaxation of the AC power flow model and is compared to the classic DC power flow approximation. A case study is provided on the 73-bus RTS-GMLC test system for various investment budgets and multiple hurricane scenarios to highlight the difference in optimal investment decisions between the SOCP model and the DC model, and demonstrate the advantages of OTS in resiliency settings. Results indicate that the network models yield different optimal investments, unit commitment, and OTS decisions, and an AC feasibility study indicates our SOCP resiliency model is more accurate than the DC model.