Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Often PV hosting capacity analysis is performed for a limited number of distribution feeders. For medium - voltage distribution feeders, previous results generally analyze less than 20 feeders, and then the results are extrapolated out to similar types of feeders. Previous hosting capacity research has often focused on determining a single value for the hosting capacity for the entire feeder, whereas this research expands previous hosting capacity work to investigate all the regions of the feeder that may allow many different hosting capacity values wit h an idea called locational hosting capacity (LHC)to determine the largest PV size that can be interconnected at different locations (buses) on the study feeders. This report discusses novel methods for analyzing PV interconnections with advanced simulati on methods. The focus is feeder and location - specific impacts of PV that determine the locational PV hosting capacity. Feeder PV impact signature are used to more precisely determine the local maximum hosting capacity of individual areas of the feeder. T he feeder signature provides improved interconnection screening with certain zones that show the risk of impact to the distribution feeder from PV interconnections.

This report investigates the fault current contribution from a single large PV system and the impact it has on existing distribution overcurrent protection devices. Assumptions are made about the modeling of the PV system under fault to perform exhaustive steady - state fault analyses throughout distribution feeder models. Each PV interconnection location is tested to determine how the size of the PV system affects the fault current measured by each protection device. This data is then searched for logical conditions that indicate whether a protection device has operated in a manner that will cause more customer outages due to the addition of the PV system. This is referred to as a protection issue , and there are four unique types of issues that have been identified in the study. The PV system size at which any issues occur are recorded to determine the feeder's PV hosting capacity limitations due to interference with protection settings. The analysis is carried out on six feeder models. The report concludes with a discussion of the prevalence and cause of each protection issue caused by PV system fault current.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

This paper describes methods that a distribution engineer could use to determine advanced inverter settings to improve distribution system performance. These settings are for fixed power factor, volt-var, and volt-watt functionality. Depending on the level of detail that is desired, different methods are proposed to determine single settings applicable for all advanced inverters on a feeder or unique settings for each individual inverter. Seven distinctly different utility distribution feeders are analyzed to simulate the potential benefit in terms of hosting capacity, system losses, and reactive power attained with each method to determine the advanced inverter settings.

Photovoltaic (PV) distributed energy resources (DER) have reached approximately 27 GW in the U.S., and the solar penetration rate continues to increase. This growth is expected to continue, causing challenges for grid operators who must maintain grid stability, reliability, and resiliency. To minimize adverse effects on the performance of electrical power system (EPS) with increasing levels of variable renewable generation, photovoltaic inverters must implement grid-support capabilities, allowing the DER to actively participate in grid support operations and remain connected during short-term voltage and frequency anomalies. These functions include voltage and frequency regulation features that adjust DER active and reactive power at the point of common coupling. To evaluate the risk of these functions conflicting with traditional distribution system voltage regulation equipment, researchers used several methods to quantify EPS-support function response times for autonomous voltage regulation functions (volt-var function). Based on this study, no adverse interactions between PV inverters with volt-var functions and load tap changing transformers or capacitor banks were discovered.

Photovoltaic (PV) distributed energy resources (DER) have reached approximately 27 GW in the U.S., and the solar penetration rate continues to increase. This growth is expected to continue, causing challenges for grid operators who must maintain grid stability, reliability, and resiliency. To minimize adverse effects on the performance of electrical power system (EPS) with increasing levels of variable renewable generation, photovoltaic inverters must implement grid-support capabilities, allowing the DER to actively participate in grid support operations and remain connected during short-term voltage and frequency anomalies. These functions include voltage and frequency regulation features that adjust DER active and reactive power at the point of common coupling. To evaluate the risk of these functions conflicting with traditional distribution system voltage regulation equipment, researchers used several methods to quantify EPS-support function response times for autonomous voltage regulation functions (volt-var function). Based on this study, no adverse interactions between PV inverters with volt-var functions and load tap changing transformers or capacitor banks were discovered.

This paper describes methods that a distribution engineer could use to determine advanced inverter settings to improve distribution system performance. These settings are for fixed power factor, volt-var, and volt-watt functionality. Depending on the level of detail that is desired, different methods are proposed to determine single settings applicable for all advanced inverters on a feeder or unique settings for each individual inverter. Seven distinctly different utility distribution feeders are analyzed to simulate the potential benefit in terms of hosting capacity, system losses, and reactive power attained with each method to determine the advanced inverter settings.

A control algorithm is designed to smooth the variability of PV power output using distributed batteries. The tradeoff between smoothing and battery size is shown. It is also demonstrated that large numbers of highly distributed current, voltage, and irradiance sensors can be utilized to control the distributed storage in a more optimal manner. It is also demonstrated that centralized energy storage control for PV ramp rate smoothing requires very fast communication, typically less than a 15-second update rate. Finally, advanced inverter dynamic reactive current is shown to provide voltage variability smoothing, hence reducing the number of voltage regulator tap changes without energy storage.

A control algorithm is designed to smooth the variability of PV power output using distributed batteries. The tradeoff between smoothing and battery size is shown. It is also demonstrated that large numbers of highly distributed current, voltage, and irradiance sensors can be utilized to control the distributed storage in a more optimal manner. It is also demonstrated that centralized energy storage control for PV ramp rate smoothing requires very fast communication, typically less than a 15-second update rate. Finally, advanced inverter dynamic reactive current is shown to provide voltage variability smoothing, hence reducing the number of voltage regulator tap changes without energy storage.

The research presented in this paper compares five real-time control strategies for the power output of a large number of distributed PV systems in a large distribution feeder circuit. Both real and reactive power controls are considered with the goal of minimizing network over-voltage violations caused by high penetrations of PV generation. The control parameters are adjusted to maximize the effectiveness of each control. The controls are then compared based on their ability to achieve multiple objectives. These objectives include minimizing the total number of voltage violations, minimizing the total amount of PV energy curtailed or reactive power generated, and maximizing the fairness of any control action among all PV systems. The controls are simulated on the OpenDSS platform using time series load and spatially-distributed irradiance data.

Abstract not provided.

A central control algorithm was developed to utilize photovoltaic system advanced inverter functions, specifically fixed power factor and constant reactive power, to provide distribution system voltage regulation and to mitigate voltage regulator tap operations by using voltage measurements at the regulator. As with any centralized control strategy, the capabilities of the control require a reliable and fast communication infrastructure. These communication requirements were evaluated by varying the interval at which the controller sends dispatch commands and evaluating the effectiveness to mitigate tap operations. The control strategy was demonstrated to perform well for communication intervals faster than the delay on the voltage regulator (30 seconds). The communication reliability, latency, and bandwidth requirements were also evaluated.