Publications

Abstract not provided.

The mission of the United States Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management is to complete the safe cleanup of the environmental legacy brought about from five decades of nuclear weapons development and go vernment - sponsored nuclear energy re search. S ome of the waste s that that must be managed have be en identified as good candidates for disposal in a deep borehole in crystalline rock (SNL 2014 a). In particular, wastes that can be disposed of in a small package are good candidates for this disposal concept. A canister - based system that can be used for handling these wastes during the disposition process (i.e., storage, transfers, transportation, and disposal) could facilitate the eventual disposal of these wastes. This report provides information for a program plan for developing specifications regarding a canister - based system that facilitates small waste form packaging and disposal and that is integrated with the overall efforts of the DOE's Office of Nuclear Energy Used Fuel Dis position Camp aign's Deep Borehole Field Test . Groundwork for Universal Ca nister System Development September 2015 ii W astes to be considered as candidates for the universal canister system include capsules containing cesium and strontium currently stored in pools at the Hanford Site, cesium to be processed using elutable or nonelutable resins at the Hanford Site, and calcine waste from Idaho National Laboratory. The initial emphasis will be on disposal of the cesium and strontium capsules in a deep borehole that has been drilled into crystalline rock. Specifications for a universal canister system are derived from operational, performance, and regulatory requirements for storage, transfers, transportation, and disposal of radioactive waste. Agreements between the Department of Energy and the States of Washington and Idaho, as well as the Deep Borehole Field Test plan provide schedule requirements for development of the universal canister system . Future work includes collaboration with the Hanford Site to move the cesium and strontium capsules into dry storage, collaboration with the Deep Borehole Field Tes t to develop surface handling and emplacement techniques and to develop the waste package design requirements, developing universal canister system design options and concepts of operations, and developing system analysis tools. Areas in which f urther research and development are needed include material properties and structural integrity, in - package sorbents and fillers, waste form tolerance to heat and postweld stress relief, waste package impact limiters, sensors, cesium mobility under downhol e conditions, and the impact of high pressure and high temperature environment on seals design.

Abstract not provided.

The current management system in the United States for commercial spent nuclear fuel does not emphasize integration among storage, transportation, and disposal. Unless a path can be implemented that addresses the long-term needs for integration, the United States could end up leaving substantial quantities of stranded commercial spent nuclear fuel stored at decommissioned reactor sites in an increasingly wide variety of containers. This lack of integration does not cause safety issues, but may delay transporting the spent fuel and complicate options for permanent disposal. The large containers now in use for dry storage remain at high temperatures for decades, thereby delaying transportation from decommissioned reactors. The large containers also have no easy path to disposal unless (1) disposal is further delayed (up to 150 years or more for some mined repository concepts); (2) the contents are repackaged into smaller, cooler packages; or (3) the high temperatures are used as de facto site-selection and design criteria for a repository. Implementing consolidated interim storage could address many issues that exist because of this lack of integration. A consolidated interim storage facility that includes appropriate capabilities can allow existing disparate parts to integrate as a system. Previous agencies and commissions have noted this theme before as a way to provide flexibility in the waste management system. This report uses the rationale for such an approach as a framework to discuss the complexities of reconfiguring the waste management system to include consolidated storage. However, concerns that increased storage capacity will reduce the national urgency for a repository are unavoidable, and continued effort will be necessary in public dialogues on the societal aspects of moving commercial spent nuclear fuel into consolidated interim storage. A single optimal solution for integrating current storage and planned transportation with disposal is unlikely. Rather, efforts to integrate various phases of spent fuel management should begin promptly and continue throughout the remaining life of the current fuel cycle. These efforts will need to adapt continuously to evolving circumstances.

Abstract not provided.

This study has evaluated the technical feasibility of direct disposal in a geologic repository, of commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in dual-purpose canisters (DPCs) of existing designs. The authors, representing several national laboratories, considered waste isolation safety, engineering feasibility, thermal management, and postclosure criticality control. The 3-year study concludes that direct disposal is technically feasible for most DPCs, depending on the repository host geology. Postclosure criticality control, and thermal management strategies that allow permanent disposal within 150 years, are two of the most challenging aspects. This document summarizes technical results from a series of previous reports, and describes additional studies that can be done especially if site-specific information becomes available from one or more prospective repository sites.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The theme of the paper is that consolidated interim storage can provide an important integrating function between storage and disposal in the United States. Given the historical tension between consolidated interim storage and disposal in the United States, this paper articulates a rationale for consolidated interim storage. However, the paper concludes more effort could be expended on developing the societal aspects of the rationale, in addition to the technical and operational aspects of using consolidated interim storage.

Options for disposal of the spent nuclear fuel and high level radioactive waste that are projected to exist in the United States in 2048 were studied. The options included four different disposal concepts: mined repositories in salt, clay/shale rocks, and crystalline rocks; and deep boreholes in crystalline rocks. Some of the results of this study are that all waste forms, with the exception of untreated sodium-bonded spent nuclear fuel, can be disposed of in any of the mined disposal concepts, although with varying degrees of confidence; salt allows for more flexibility in managing high-heat waste in mined repositories than other media; small waste forms are potentially attractive candidates for deep borehole disposal; and disposal of commercial SNF in existing dual-purpose canisters is potentially feasible but could pose significant challenges both in repository operations and in demonstrating confidence in long-term performance. Questions addressed by this study include: is a " 'one-size-fits-all ' repository a good strategic option for disposal?" and "do some disposal concepts perform significantly better with or without specific waste types or forms? " The study provides the bases for answering these questions by evaluating potential impacts of waste forms on the feasibility and performance of representative generic concepts for geologic disposal.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Waste heat generation, repository temperature, and waste radiotoxicity were evaluated using three idealized fuel cycle cases (Table I) in addition to reference UNF. Heat output was normalized to electrical energy produced, simplifying thermal analysis of alternative fuel cycles, especially if waste mass and volume can be accommodated using various container and engineered barrier system configurations. Using a reference repository thermal model, the peak near-field temperature for these cases is shown to be in the range 100 to 130°C, indicating that any of the cases considered can be thermally "fine tuned" (line loading density, decay storage) to limit temperatures as required. Whereas transmutation of TRUs has been proposed to limit repository temperatures after decay of short-lived fission products, the repository concept of operations (drift spacing, decay storage, waste packaging, active ventilation, etc.) can be readily adjusted to accomplish the same effect. The potential radiotoxicity from long-lived fission products, normalized to electricity produced, is effectively the same for all three fuel cycle cases. This is especially important for a repository in clay or shale, where LLFPs are the major contributors to projected dose. Thus, burning of TRUs (conversion to fission products) may decrease overall radiotoxicity, but without significantly changing the toxicity of fission products, or the projected dose for a clay/shale repository, if electrical energy is produced and taken into account (Figure 5). Separation of long-lived fission products, and direct transmutation, have limited applicability with attendant technical and economic challenges.11 Whatever approach is taken to manage long-lived fission products, it should consider the entire system including geologic disposal, and the impacts should be normalized to the benefits, i.e., to the useable energy produced.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for disposing of a variety of radioactive and mixed wastes, some of which are considered special-case waste because they do not currently have a clear disposal option. It may be possible to dispose of some of the DOE`s special-case waste using greater confinement disposal techniques at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The DOE asked Sandia National Laboratories to investigate this possibility by performing system configuration analyses. The first step in performing system configuration analyses is to estimate the characteristics of special-case waste that might be destined for disposal at the NTS. The objective of this report is to characterize this special-case waste based upon information available in the literature. No waste was sampled and analyzed specifically for this report. The waste compositions given are not highly detailed, consisting of grains and curies of specific radionuclides per cubic meter. However, such vague waste characterization is adequate for the purposes of the system configuration task. In some previous work done on this subject, Kudera et al. [1990] identified nine categories of special-case radioactive waste and estimated volumes and activities for these categories. It would have been difficult to develop waste compositions based on the categories proposed by Kudera et al. [1990], so we created five groups of waste on which to base the waste compositions. These groups are (1) transuranic waste, (2) fission product waste, (3) activation product waste, (4) mobile/volatile waste, and (5) sealed sources. The radionuclides within a given group share common characteristics (e.g., alpha-emitters, heat generators), and we believe that these groups adequately represent the DOE`s special-case waste potentially destined for greater confinement disposal at the NTS.

Both the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) have promulgated regulations regarding the performance of geologic repositories for the disposal of high-level nuclear waste. One of the responsibilities of the US Department of Energy (DOE) is to demonstrate compliance with the appropriate regulations. The DOE will most likely use extensive numerical modeling to show compliance with the various quantitative requirements. These analyses will then be evaluated by the NRC. There are different levels of evaluation: peer review, conservative estimates,used of existing models/codes, and development of models/codes by the NRC. The intensity of the review will vary from analysis to analysis, depending on the importance of the analysis, the acceptability of the conceptual model behind the analysis and the solution technique used, and the potential for increasing confidence in the system description, should the NRC decide to develop its own models/codes. An appropriate level of review can be determined by applying these four criteria in a specific manner. 24 refs.