Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Unmitigated arc-faults present fire dangers, shock hazards, and cause system downtime in photovoltaic (PV) systems. The 2011 National Electrical Code® added section 690.11 to require a listed arc-fault protection device on new PV systems. Underwriters Laboratories created the outline of investigation for PV DC arc-fault circuit protection, UL 1699B, for certifying arc-fault circuit interrupters (AFCIs) for arc suppression. Unfortunately, little is known about appropriate trip times for arc-faults generated at different locations in the PV system, with different electrode and polymer encapsulant geometries and materials. In this investigation, a plasma model was developed which determines fire danger with UL 1699B-listed AFCIs and consequences of arc-fault discharges sustained beyond UL 1699B trip time requirements. This model predicts temperatures for varying system configurations and was validated by 100 and 300 W arc-faults experiments where combustion times and temperatures were measured. This investigation then extrapolated burn characteristics using this model to predict polymer ignition times for exposure to arc power levels between 100-1200 W. The numerical results indicate AFCI maximum trip times required by UL 1699B are sufficient to suppress 100-1200 W arc-faults prior to fire initiation. Optical emission spectroscopy and thermochemical decomposition analysis were also conducted to assess spectral and chemical degradation of the polymer sheath.

Abstract not provided.

Disclaimer: The following document includes draft certification protocols and should not be viewed as a consensus-based performance standard. Distributed energy resources (DERs), such as photovoltaic (PV) systems, when deployed in a large scale, are capable of significantly influencing the operation of bulk and local power systems. Looking to the future, European and American stakeholders are working on standards to make it possible to manage the potentially complex interactions between DER and the power system. One of the jurisdictions considering modifications to the DER interconnection requirements is California. To determine what changes could improve electric grid reliability and allow greater penetrations of renewable energy, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the California Energy Commission (CEC), in conjunction with consultant Frances Cleveland, convened the Smart Inverter Working Group (SIWG) in January 2013. The SIWG--composed of state agencies, utility engineers, national laboratories, manufacturers, trade associations, and advocacy groups--provided the CPUC a set of recommendations in early 2014 1 . The recommendations included specific advanced DER functions and interoperability requirements, along with a proposed timeline, for California to add new capabilities to grid-interconnected DER. On August 18, 2014 the three California Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs)--Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E)--drafted a Advice Letter filing to the CPUC setting forth revisions to Electric Tariff Rule 21 to conform to the seven recommendations made by the Working Group 2 . After a comment period, the CPUC issued an update to the IOU recommendations 3 . At the time of this publication, there was no final legal ruling on the CPUC Rulemaking (R.) 11-09-011 ("Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission's Own Motion to improve distribution level interconnection rules and regulations for certain classes of electric generators and electric storage resources"). In the U.S., Nationally Recognized Test Laboratories (NRTLs) independently verify products to safety and functional standards. PV inverters are certified to Underwriters Laboratories (UL) Standard 1741 4 . However, new advanced inverter functions described in the SIWG and IOU proposals are not included in this standard, so there is a critical need to develop test protocols for these functions in preparation of a positive ruling by the CPUC. Through a California Solar Initiative Grant, Sandia National Laboratories (Sandia or SNL), Underwriters Laboratories (UL), Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. (EPRI), Xanthus Consulting, SunSpec Alliance, Loggerware, and utility and PV inverter manufacturers have collaborated to draft this certification protocol for the Rule 21 SIWG Phase 1 advanced inverter functions. This report also includes test procedures for Phase 2 and Phase 3 functions that will be demonstrated later in the CSI4 project. This collaborative effort was performed in close junction with the UL 1741 Standards Technical Panel (STP) working group. This document represents a snapshot of the draft testing protocols at the time of publication and not a consensus certification protocol for advanced inverters. 1 California Public Utilities Commission, "Recommendations for Updating the Technical Requirements for Inverters in Distributed Energy Resources, Smart Inverter Working Group Recommendations," Filed 7 Feb 2014. 2 J.J. Newlander, R.G. Litteneker, S.W. Walter, M. Dwyer, Joint motion of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39 E), Southern California Edison Company (U 338 E) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902 E) regarding implementation of smart inverter functionalities, Rulemaking 11-09-011 Advice Letter, 18 July, 2014. 3 J.T. Sullivan, CPUC Rulemaking 11-09-011 Agenda ID #13460, 13 Nov, 2014. 4 Underwriters Laboratories Std. 1741 Ed. 2, "Inverters, Converters, Controllers and Interconnection System Equipment for use with Distributed Energy Resources," 2010.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

IEEE Standard 1547-2003 conformance of several interconnected microinverters was performed by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) to determine if there were emergent adverse behaviors of co-located aggregated distributed energy resources. Experiments demonstrated the certification tests could be expanded for multi-manufacturer microinverter interoperability. Evaluations determined the microinverters' response to abnormal conditions in voltage and frequency, interruption in grid service, and cumulative power quality. No issues were identified to be caused by the interconnection of multiple devices.

This work investigates balance of systems (BOS) connector reliability from the perspective of arc fault risk. Accelerated tests were performed on connectors for future development of a reliability model. Thousands of hours of damp heat and atmospheric corrosion tests found BOS connectors to be resilient to corrosion-related degradation. A procedure was also developed to evaluate new and aged connectors for arc fault risk. The measurements show that arc fault risk is dependent on a combination of materials composition as well as design geometry. Thermal measurements as well as optical emission spectroscopy were also performed to further characterize the arc plasma. Together, the degradation model, arc fault risk assessment technique, and characterization methods can provide operators of photovoltaic installations information necessary to develop a data-driven plan for BOS connector maintenance as well as identify opportunities for arc fault prognostics.

Data from of a highly instrumented residential feeder in Ota City, Japan was used to determine 1 second load variability for the aggregation of 50, 100, 250, and 500 homes. The load variability is categorized by binning the data into seasons, weekdays vs. weekends, and time of day to create artificial sub-15-minute variability estimates for modeling dynamic load profiles. An autoregressive, AR(1) function along with a high pass filter was used to simulate the high resolution variability. The simulated data were validated against the original 1-second measured data.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.