Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Energy storage technologies are positioned to play a substantial role in power delivery systems. They are being touted as an effective new resource to maintain reliability and allow for increased penetration of renewable energy. However, due to their relative infancy, there is a lack of knowledge on how these resources truly operate over time. Data analysis can help ascertain the operational and performance characteristics of these emerging technologies. Rigorous testing and data analysis are important for all stakeholders to ensure a safe, reliable system that performs predictably on a macro level. Standardizing testing and analysis approaches to verifying the performance of energy storage devices, equipment, and systems when integrating them into the grid will improve the understanding and benefit of energy storage over time from technical and economic vantage points. Demonstrating the life-cycle value and capabilities of energy storage systems begins with the data the provider supplies for analysis. After review of energy storage data received from several providers, it has become clear that some of these data are inconsistent and incomplete, raising the question of their efficacy for robust analysis. This report reviews and proposes general guidelines such as sampling rates and data points that providers must supply for robust data analysis to take place. Consistent guidelines are the basis of the proper protocol and ensuing standards to (a) reduce the time it takes data to reach those who are providing analysis; (b) allow them to better understand the energy storage installations; and (c) enable them to provide high-quality analysis of the installations. This report is intended to serve as a starting point for what data points should be provided when monitoring. As battery technologies continue to advance and the industry expands, this report will be updated to remain current.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Battery energy storage is being installed behind-the-meter to reduce electrical bills while improving power system efficiency and resiliency. This paper demonstrates the development and application of an advanced optimal control method for battery energy storage systems to maximize these benefits. We combine methods for accurately modeling the state-of-charge, temperature, and state-of-health of lithium-ion battery cells into a model predictive controller to optimally schedule charge/discharge, air-conditioning, and forced air convection power to shift a electric customer's consumption and hence reduce their electric bill. While linear state-of-health models produce linear relationships between battery usage and degradation, a non-linear, stress-factor model accounts for the compounding improvements in lifetime that can be achieved by reducing several stress factors at once. Applying this controller to a simulated system shows significant benefits from cooling-in-the-loop control and that relatively small sacrifices in bill reduction performance can yield large increases in battery life. This trade-off function is highly dependent on the battery's degradation mechanisms and what model is used to represent them.

Battery energy storage is being installed behind-the-meter to reduce electrical bills while improving power system efficiency and resiliency. This paper demonstrates the development and application of an advanced optimal control method for battery energy storage systems to maximize these benefits. We combine methods for accurately modeling the state-of-charge, temperature, and state-of-health of lithium-ion battery cells into a model predictive controller to optimally schedule charge/discharge, air-conditioning, and forced air convection power to shift a electric customer's consumption and hence reduce their electric bill. While linear state-of-health models produce linear relationships between battery usage and degradation, a non-linear, stress-factor model accounts for the compounding improvements in lifetime that can be achieved by reducing several stress factors at once. Applying this controller to a simulated system shows significant benefits from cooling-in-the-loop control and that relatively small sacrifices in bill reduction performance can yield large increases in battery life. This trade-off function is highly dependent on the battery's degradation mechanisms and what model is used to represent them.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

As batteries become more prevalent in grid energy storage applications, the controllers that decide when to charge and discharge become critical to maximizing their utilization. Controller design for these applications is based on models that mathematically represent the physical dynamics and constraints of batteries. Unrepresented dynamics in these models can lead to suboptimal control. Our goal is to examine the state-of-the-art with respect to the models used in optimal control of battery energy storage systems (BESSs). This review helps engineers navigate the range of available design choices and helps researchers by identifying gaps in the state-of-the-art. BESS models can be classified by physical domain: state-of-charge (SoC), temperature, and degradation. SoC models can be further classified by the units they use to define capacity: electrical energy, electrical charge, and chemical concentration. Most energy based SoC models are linear, with variations in ways of representing efficiency and the limits on power. The charge based SoC models include many variations of equivalent circuits for predicting battery string voltage. SoC models based on chemical concentrations use material properties and physical parameters in the cell design to predict battery voltage and charge capacity. Temperature is modeled through a combination of heat generation and heat transfer. Heat is generated through changes in entropy, overpotential losses, and resistive heating. Heat is transferred through conduction, radiation, and convection. Variations in thermal models are based on which generation and transfer mechanisms are represented and the number and physical significance of finite elements in the model. Modeling battery degradation can be done empirically or based on underlying physical mechanisms. Empirical stress factor models isolate the impacts of time, current, SoC, temperature, and depth-of-discharge (DoD) on battery state-of-health (SoH). Through a few simplifying assumptions, these stress factors can be represented using regularization norms. Physical degradation models can further be classified into models of side-reactions and those of material fatigue. This article demonstrates the importance of model selection to optimal control by providing several example controller designs. Simpler models may overestimate or underestimate the capabilities of the battery system. Adding details can improve accuracy at the expense of model complexity, and computation time. Our analysis identifies six gaps: deficiency of real-world data in control literature, lack of understanding in how to balance modeling detail with the number of representative cells, underdeveloped model uncertainty based risk-averse and robust control of BESS, underdevelopment of nonlinear energy based SoC models, lack of hysteresis in voltage models used for control, lack of entropy heating and cooling in thermal modeling, and deficiency of knowledge in what combination of empirical degradation stress factors is most accurate. These gaps are opportunities for future research.

Abstract not provided.

In late July 2018, the Energy Storage (ES) Safety Collaborative sent a survey to their stakeholders. The survey was designed to gather input and data to "support the timely deployment of safe energy storage technologies." The survey would also help to inform decisions related to enhancing ES efforts while "streamlining opportunities for collaboration amongst all relevant stakeholders." A total of 17 questions were included in the survey: 13 multiple choice questions and 4 open response questions. A total of 51 responses were collected and presented here are some of the high-level takeaways.

Batteries are designed to store electrical energy. The increasing variation in time value of energy has driven the use of batteries as controllable distributed energy resources (DER). This is enabled though low-cost power electronic inverters that are able to precisely control charge and discharge. This paper describes the software implementation of an open-source battery inverter fleet models in python. The Sandia BatterylnverterFleet class model can be used by scientists, researchers, and engineers to perform simulations of one or more fleets of similar battery-inverter systems connected to the grid. The program tracks the state- of-charge of the simulated batteries and ensures that they stay within their limits while responding to separately generated service requests to charge or discharge. This can be used to analyze control and coordination, placement and sizing, and many other problems associated with the integration of batteries on the power grid. The development of these models along with their python implementation was funded by the Grid Modernization Laboratory Consortium (GMLC) project 1.4.2. Definitions, Standards and Test Procedures for Grid Services from Devices.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Power systems can become unstable under transient periods such as short-circuit faults, leading to equipment damage and large scale blackouts. Power system stabilizers (PSS) can be designed to improve the stability of generators by quickly regulating the exciter field voltage to damp the swings of generator rotor angle and speed. The stability achieved through exciter field voltage control can be further improved with a relatively small, fast responding energy storage system (ESS) connected at the terminals of the generator that enables electrical power damping. PSS are designed and studied using a single-machine infinite-bus (SMIB) model. In this paper, we present a comprehensive optimal-control design for a flexible ac synchronous generator PSS using both exciter field voltage and ESS control including estimation of unmeasurable states. The controller is designed to minimize disturbances in rotor frequency and angle, and thereby improve stability. The design process is based on a linear quadratic regulator of the SMIB model with a test system linearized about different operating frequencies in the range 10 Hz to 60 Hz. The optimal performance of the PSS is demonstrated along with the resulting stability improvement.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Battery energy storage systems (BESS) are a critical technology for integrating high penetration renewable power on an intelligent electrical grid. As limited energy restricts the steady-state operational state-of-charge (SoC) of storage systems, SoC forecasting models are used to determine feasible charge and discharge schedules that supply grid services. Smart grid controllers use SoC forecasts to optimize BESS schedules to make grid operation more efficient and resilient. This study presents three advances in BESS state-of-charge forecasting. First, two forecasting models are reformulated to be conducive to parameter optimization. Second, a new method for selecting optimal parameter values based on operational data is presented. Last, a new framework for quantifying model accuracy is developed that enables a comparison between models, systems, and parameter selection methods. The accuracies achieved by both models, on two example battery systems, with each method of parameter selection are then compared in detail. The results of this analysis suggest variation in the suitability of these models for different battery types and applications. Finally, the proposed model formulations, optimization methods, and accuracy assessment framework can be used to improve the accuracy of SoC forecasts enabling better control over BESS charge/discharge schedules.

The goal of the DOE OE ESS Safety Roadmap is to foster confidence in the safety and reliability of energy storage systems.