Results of a meeting for the purpose of coordination and discussion of test plans at Tonapah. Participants were engineers responsible for the field test, engineering, launcher, handling equipment, and aerodynamics of the test rockets.
Results of a meeting for the purpose of coordination and discussion of engineering problems involved. Participants were engineers responsible for the field test, engineering, launcher, handling equipment, and aerodynamics of the test rockets.
About neutron detector needs for beneath the shot cap on Kickapoo, inside the Mk 5s and
This project was to provide field troops with an active defense against V-2 type ballistic missiles, free-fall bombs, Hones John-type missiles, and Corporal-type missiles.
AEC was given exclusive use and occupancy of the assembly building and the appurtenant structures which had bee constructed with AEC funds. It was to furnish fire protection and maintenance of the facilities.
About the maintenance spares support plan, spare parts provisioning for supplier items, AFSWP_AEC spare parts provisioning system; certification of multiple application test equipment, road material special equipment catalogs, Class A & B weapons groups.
An early plan, prepared at request of AEC for integration operation and management of weapon component production facilities. Proposed management responsibility for Sandia.
A memo about relative work loads.
Abstract not provided.
AEC was given exclusive use and occupancy of the assembly building and the appurtenant structures which had bee constructed with AEC funds. It was to furnish fire protection and maintenance of the facilities.
AEC was given exclusive use and occupancy of the assembly building and the appurtenant structures which had bee constructed with AEC funds. It was to furnish fire protection and maintenance of the facilities.
Abstract not provided.
The agreed to procedure.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
An agreement between Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Sandia Corporation, and the Atomic Energy Commission.
Comparison of riveted vs. welded bomb case. Factors considered: design performance, single design, time scale, weight, and source. Conclusion and recommendations.
Abstract not provided.