Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Cyanobacteria have been shown to be capable of producing a variety of advanced biofuels; however, product yields remain well below those necessary for large scale production. New genetic tools and high throughput metabolic engineering techniques are needed to optimize cyanobacterial metabolisms for enhanced biofuel production. Towards this goal, this project advances the development of a multiple promoter replacement technique for systems-level optimization of gene expression in a model cyanobacterial host: Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002. To realize this multiple-target approach, key capabilities were developed, including a high throughput detection method for advanced biofuels, enhanced transformation efficiency, and genetic tools for Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002. Moreover, several additional obstacles were identified for realization of this multiple promoter replacement technique. The techniques and tools developed in this project will help to enable future efforts in the advancement of cyanobacterial biofuels.

Abstract not provided.

To determine the effect of Liquidoff on bacteria, three bacterial strains were tested: Escherichia coli DH5α, Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002, and Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. E. coli DH5α is a Gram-negative, aerobic bacterium that is often found in normal gut flora and is commonly used the laboratory due to its fast growth rate. Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 and S. elongatus PCC 7942 are Gram-negative, aquatic, autophototrophic cyanobacteria. Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 is a marine cyanobacterium isolated from ‘fish pens’ on Magueyes Island, Puerto Rico in 1962, while S. elongatus PCC 7942 is a freshwater cyanobacterium. It should be noted that no Gram-positive bacterium was tested in this study.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Microbial free fatty acids (FFAs) have been proposed as a potential feedstock for renewable energy. The ability to directly convert carbon dioxide into FFAs makes cyanobacteria ideal hosts for renewable FFA production. Previous metabolic engineering efforts using the cyanobacterial hosts Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 have demonstrated this direct conversion of carbon dioxide into FFAs; however, FFA yields in these hosts are limited by the negative impact of FFA production on the host cell physiology. This work investigates the use of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 as a cyanobacterial host for FFA production. In comparison to S. elongatus PCC 7942, Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 strains produced and excreted FFAs at similar concentrations but without the detrimental effects on host physiology. The enhanced tolerance to FFA production with Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 was found to be temperature-dependent, with physiological effects such as reduced photosynthetic yield and decreased photosynthetic pigments observed at higher temperatures. Additional genetic manipulations were targeted for increased FFA production, including thioesterases and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO). Overexpression of non-native RuBisCO subunits (rbcLS) from a psbAI promoter resulted in more than a threefold increase in FFA production, with excreted FFA concentrations reaching >130 mg/L. This work illustrates the importance of host strain selection for cyanobacterial biofuel production and demonstrates that the FFA tolerance of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 can allow for high yields of excreted FFA.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Photosynthetically derived fuels, such as those produced by microalgae, are touted as a future renewable energy source and a means for achieving energy independence. Realization of these claims, however, will require fuel production rates beyond the native capabilities of these microorganisms. The development of a metabolic engineering toolkit for microalgae will be key for reaching the production rates necessary for fuel production. This work advances the toolkit for cyanobacterial fuels by exploring the use of eukaryotic algal gene sources for free fatty acid biosynthesis rather than the traditional bacterial and plant sources. Many species of eukaryotic algae naturally accumulate high levels of triacylglycerol, a compound requiring three fatty acid side chains. Triacylglycerol accumulation implies that eukaryotic algae have naturally efficient enzymes for free fatty acid production, representing an unexplored resource for metabolic engineering targets. In this work, the model cyanobacterium, Synechococcus elongatus PCC7942, was engineered for free fatty acid production by targeting three main rate-limiting steps: (1) fatty acid release, catalyzed by a thioesterase, (2) fixation of carbon by ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, and (3) the first committed step in fatty acid biosynthesis, acetyl-CoA carboxylase. The recombinant acyl-ACP thioesterase and acetyl-CoA carboxylase were derived from the model green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii CC-503. By targeting these proposed rate-determining steps, free fatty acid production was improved on a cell weight basis; however, the overall concentration of excreted free fatty acid did not increase. Recombinant gene expression was optimized by using native promoters, and while expression improved, the free fatty acid yield did not likewise increase. From physiological measurements, it was determined that free fatty acid production in S. elongatus PCC7942 is ultimately limited by the negative physiological effects associated with free fatty acid synthesis rather than bottlenecks within the metabolic pathway. This work demonstrates the successful expression of algal genes in a cyanobacterial host, but further improvement in free fatty acid yields will only be possible when the negative effects of free fatty acid production are mitigated. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA).

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.