Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The marine energy (ME) industry historically lacked a standardized data processing toolkit for common tasks such as data ingestion, quality control, and visualization. The marine and hydrokinetic toolkit (MHKiT) solved this issue by providing a public software deployment (open-source and free) toolkit for the ME industry to store and maintain commonly used functionality for wave, tidal, and river energy. This paper demonstrates an initial model verification study in MHKiT. Using Delft3D, a numerical model of the Tanana River Test Site (TRTS) at Nenana, Alaska was created. Field data from the site was collected using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) at the proposed Current Energy Converter (CEC) locations. MHKiT is used to process model simulations from Delft3D and compare them to the transect data from the ADCP measurements at TRTS. The ability to use a single tool to process simulation and field data demonstrates the ease at which the ME industry can obtain results and collaborate across specialties, reducing errors and increasing efficiency.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The purpose of this Seedling project is to couple a marine renewable energy (MRE) dynamics simulation software with the soil-foundation models in the OC6 Phase II project [Bergua et al., 2021] and evaluate the software’s performance. This is a first step to accurately evaluating soil-foundation impacts on other types of MRE, like wave or current energy converters (WECs, CECs). OC6 Phase II compares offshore wind turbine (OWT) simulations using several different soil-foundation models to identify and fill key gaps in soil-foundation analyses. WEC-Sim was chosen to model the OC6 Phase II offshore wind turbine and various load cases because of its adaptability, accuracy of hydrodynamic loads, and ability to apply an arbitrary wind loading. Of the four methods used in OC6, the apparent fixity soil-foundation method was coupled with WEC-Sim. Technical challenges with flexible hydrodynamic bodies, added mass and external function libraries inhibited the ability to compare the WEC-Sim results to other OC6 participants. These challenges required that the WEC-Sim model of the OC6 OWT use a combination of rigid and flexible bodies to ensure a numerically stable solution. The rigid monopile creates a more stiff system and causes smaller amplitude motion under hydrodynamic loading and higher dominant frequency of motion under wind loading. These discrepancies are expected based on the increased stiffness of the WEC-Sim case.