Publications

Yang, Lynn I.; Heimer, Brandon W.

Abstract not provided.

Heimer, Brandon W.

Abstract not provided.

Heimer, Brandon W.

Mutual vulnerability to strategic forces seems to remain the de facto foundation for strategic stability across the U.S.-Russia and U.S.-China dyadic relationships; This work has suggested the bomber force tasked with delivering the LRSO is characterized by relatively long flight times and rich signature sets which make its use inconsistent with the requirements for a disarming first-strike. Therefore, the LRSO would not be expected to disrupt mutual vulnerability by making a disarming strike more possible or attractive; Even if a stealthy air-launched cruise missile is paired with a stealth bomber aircraft, the signatures associated with bomber generation and aerial refueling from non-stealth tanker aircraft make it unlikely the LRSO could be launched against a peer or near-peer nation-state without advance warning; To the extent a nuclear armed air-launched cruise missile deters would-be U.S. adversaries from nuclear use, maintaining a survivable weapon system is crucial for maintaining that stable deterrent effect. A modern stand-off weapon and stealth delivery platform increase the probability this capability will be maintained in the future against other nations' increasingly capable A2/AD systems; The LRSO has been touted as a flexible option to deter, or conduct should deterrence fail, limited nuclear strikes pursuant to Russia's reported "escalate-to-deescalate" doctrine. The concept of limited nuclear use is still intensely debated, and there is no guarantee that escalation could be controlled even with tailored LRSO employment; The challenge of warhead discrimination has not historically led to a nuclear response to a cruise missile launch, but there is no guarantee that cannot change. Having accurate military intelligence coupled with discerning analysis of the context in which cruise missiles are employed (e.g., how escalated is the conflict, how many missiles have been launched, have there been signatures of strategic force mobilization, or has the nuclear threshold been crossed?) will likely be essential for reducing the danger of misperception. Developing norms and/or communication channels in the aforementioned dyadic relationships may also further these ends. In sum, this work has identified and analyzed many of the major arguments in the debate regarding the LRSO's impact on strategic stability. During this study and survey of other nation's conceptions of strategic stability, it became clear that the LRSO is neither inherently stabilizing or destabilizing; rather, it is one instrument in addition to unambiguous U.S. policy, clear messaging, and signaling of intent that may promote stability by reducing the risk of miscalculation and unintended escalation.

Heimer, Brandon W.

While there is consensus both in the executive branch and Congress on the need to recapitalize the U.S. nuclear weapons enterprise, the delivery system and W80-4 warhead proposed to comprise the long-range stand-off (LRSO) missile have generated considerable debate. Much of the public debate has focused on its potential to affect the strategic nuclear balance and stability. This paper seeks to elucidate both Russian and Chinese perspectives on strategic stability and apply them to a systematic analysis of how the LRSO might either enhance or diminish strategic stability for the purpose of better informing the decision-making process rather than advocate a particular position on this issue.

Heimer, Brandon W.

While there is consensus both in the executive branch and Congress on the need to recapitalize the U.S. nuclear weapons enterprise, the delivery system and W80-4 warhead proposed to comprise the LRSO have generated considerable debate. Much of the public debate has focused on its potential to affect the strategic nuclear balance and stability. This paper seeks to elucidate both Russian and Chinese perspectives on strategic stability and apply them to a systematic analysis of how the LRSO might either enhance or diminish strategic stability for the purpose of better informing the decision-making process rather than advocate a particular position on this issue.

Haddal, Chad H.; Bull, Diana L.; Hernandez, Patricia M.; Keller, Elizabeth J.; Heimer, Brandon W.; Ruffing, Anne R.; Aamir, Munaf S.

Abstract not provided.

Haddal, Chad H.; Bull, Diana L.; Hernandez, Patricia M.; Keller, Elizabeth J.; Heimer, Brandon W.; Ruffing, Anne R.; Aamir, Munaf S.

Abstract not provided.

Heimer, Brandon W.; Reinhardt, Jason C.; Burks, Lynne S.

Suppose Tom is working to develop a rocket. Susan is very interested in knowing what Tom is doing but cannot directly observe his testing of the rocket propulsion system. Specifically, she would like to know if Tom has the ability to launch a heavy rocket or a light rocket. She thinks she can learn about Tom’s capability by learning about what type of rocket engine Tom is using, and the number of rockets in the design. She is considering buying a special sensor that can observe flashes from the rocket firing up during the tests and indicate if the rockets fire in a sufficiently narrow window of time such that they would successfully lift a heavy rocket.

Heimer, Brandon W.; Levinson, Rebecca S.; West, Todd H.

Abstract not provided.

Heimer, Brandon W.; Levinson, Rebecca S.; West, Todd H.

Analysis with the ParaChoice model addresses three barriers from the VTO Multi-Year Program Plan: availability of alternative fuels and electric charging station infrastructure, availability of AFVs and electric drive vehicles, and consumer reluctance to purchase new technologies. In this fiscal year, we first examined the relationship between the availability of alternative fuels and station infrastructure. Specifically, we studied how electric vehicle charging infrastructure affects the ability of EVs to compete with vehicles that rely on mature, conventional petroleum-based fuels. Second, we studied how the availability of less costly AFVs promotes their representation in the LDV fleet. Third, we used ParaChoice trade space analyses to help inform which consumers are reluctant to purchase new technologies. Last, we began analysis of impacts of alternative energy technologies on Class 8 trucks to isolate those that may most efficaciously advance HDV efficiency and petroleum use reduction goals.

Nenoff, T.M.; Brady, Patrick V.; Sasan, Koroush S.; Paap, Scott M.; Heimer, Brandon W.; Krumhansl, J.K.; Howe, K.H.; Stoll, Z.S.; Stomp, J.S.

Silica is ubiquitous in produced and industrial waters, and plays a major disruptive role in water recycle. Herein we have investigated the use of mixed oxides for the removal of silica from these waters, and their incorporation into a low cost and low energy water purification process. High selectivity hydrotalcite (HTC, (Mg₆Al₂(OH)₁₆(CO₃)•4H₂O)), is combined in series with high surface area active alumina (AA, (Al₂O₃)) as the dissolved silica removal media. Batch test results indicated that combined HTC/AA is a more effective method for removing silica from industrial cooling tower wasters (CTW) than using HTC or AA separately. The silica uptake via ion exchange on the mixed oxides was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). Furthermore, HTC/AA effectively removes silica from CTW even in the presence of large concentrations of competing anions, such as Cl^-, NO₃^- HCO₃^-, CO₃^2- and SO₄^2-. Similar to batch tests, Single Path Flow Through (SPFT) tests with sequential HTC/AA column filtration has very high silica removal too. Technoeconomic Analysis (TEA) was simultaneously performed for cost comparisons to existing silica removal technologies.

Hernandez, Patricia M.; Fruetel, Julia A.; Heimer, Brandon W.; West, Todd H.; Sa, Timothy J.; Sumner, Matthew S.

Abstract not provided.

Levinson, Rebecca S.; West, Todd H.; Heimer, Brandon W.; Sa, Timothy J.

Abstract not provided.

Heimer, Brandon W.; Levinson, Rebecca S.; West, Todd H.

Abstract not provided.

Sasan, Koroush S.; Nenoff, T.M.; Brady, Patrick V.; Krumhansl, James L.; Paap, Scott M.; Heimer, Brandon W.

Abstract not provided.

Sumner, Matthew S.; Heimer, Brandon W.; Hernandez, Patricia M.; West, Todd H.; Backus, George A.; Osborn, Thor D.; Connelly, Cathy A.; Jones, Wendell J.; Nelson, Thomas R.

Abstract not provided.

Hernandez, Patricia M.; West, Todd H.; Nelson, Thomas R.; Backus, George A.; Sumner, Matthew S.; Heimer, Brandon W.; Osborn, Thor D.; Connelly, Cathy A.; Jones, Wendell J.

Abstract not provided.

Hernandez, Patricia M.; Sumner, Matthew S.; Heimer, Brandon W.; West, Todd H.; Backus, George A.; Osborn, Thor D.; Nelson, Thomas R.; Jones, Wendell J.; Connelly, Cathy A.

Abstract not provided.

Hernandez, Patricia M.; Endo, Ashley E.; Burks, Lynne S.; Heimer, Brandon W.; John, Charles J.; Miller, Trisha H.; Teclemariam, Nerayo P.

The need for metrics for planning and response measures was identified as key gap to be addressed in the National Hurricane Program's (NHP) Technology Modernization effort. This document proposes a framework for defining a set of metrics for planning and response that will be implemented in the NHP products of hurricane evacuation studies (HES) and post-storm assessments (PSA). To determine the feasibility of this framework, a survey of current HES and PSAs was carried out followed by and then used to determine if the proposed metrics are currently captured. While there is a wide variety in data availability and detail, the implementation of these metrics is not only feasible but presents an opportunity to improve on current practices. The final implementation of this framework shall require the ongoing feedback from local, state, tribal, and federal stakeholders.

Levinson, Rebecca S.; West, Todd H.; Heimer, Brandon W.

Abstract not provided.

Nelson, Thomas R.; Sumner, Matthew S.; Backus, George A.; Hernandez, Patricia M.; Heimer, Brandon W.; Osborn, Thor D.; Jones, Wendell J.

Abstract not provided.