Publications

6 Results

Search results

Jump to search filters

Stochastic room temperature creep of 316 L stainless steel

International Journal of Plasticity

Inman, Samuel B.; Garber, Kevin W.; Robertson, Andreas E.; Brown, Nathan K.; Dingreville, Remi P.M.; Boyce, Brad L.

The creep behavior of 316 L stainless steel at room temperature was evaluated as a function of time and applied stress using a new high-Throughput approach. Several common creep models were evaluated against the observations, leading to deeper analysis of a stress-dependent modified logarithmic creep model. Within this model, multiple sources of uncertainty were compared. Aleatoric stochastic variation between samples under nominally identical conditions was identified as the primary contributor to uncertainty in creep response. Under any particular set of conditions, the sample-To-sample variability in creep strain was as high as a factor of two, highlighting the engineering importance of characterizing large statistical datasets. The model's extrapolation capabilities were assessed by comparing predictions derived from calibration on partial, shorter-duration subsets of the data. These findings underscore the importance of accounting for stochastic effects in predictive modeling of aging phenomena.

More Details

Benchmarking machine learning strategies for phase-field problems

Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering

Dingreville, Remi P.M.; Robertson, Andreas E.; Attari, Vahid; Greenwood, Michael; Ofori-Opoku, Nana; Ramesh, Mythreyi; Voorhees, Peter W.; Zhang, Qian

We present a comprehensive benchmarking framework for evaluating machine-learning approaches applied to phase-field problems. This framework focuses on four key analysis areas crucial for assessing the performance of such approaches in a systematic and structured way. Firstly, interpolation tasks are examined to identify trends in prediction accuracy and accumulation of error over simulation time. Secondly, extrapolation tasks are also evaluated according to the same metrics. Thirdly, the relationship between model performance and data requirements is investigated to understand the impact on predictions and robustness of these approaches. Finally, systematic errors are analyzed to identify specific events or inadvertent rare events triggering high errors. Quantitative metrics evaluating the local and global description of the microstructure evolution, along with other scalar metrics representative of phase-field problems, are used across these four analysis areas. This benchmarking framework provides a path to evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of machine-learning strategies applied to phase-field problems, ultimately facilitating their practical application.

More Details
6 Results
6 Results
Top