Modeling material variability with uncertainty quantification and machine learning techniques
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences
We use machine learning (ML) to infer stress and plastic flow rules using data from representative polycrystalline simulations. In particular, we use so-called deep (multilayer) neural networks (NN) to represent the two response functions. The ML process does not choose appropriate inputs or outputs, rather it is trained on selected inputs and output. Likewise, its discrimination of features is crucially connected to the chosen input-output map. Hence, we draw upon classical constitutive modeling to select inputs and enforce well-accepted symmetries and other properties. In the context of the results of numerous simulations, we discuss the design, stability and accuracy of constitutive NNs trained on typical experimental data. With these developments, we enable rapid model building in real-time with experiments, and guide data collection and feature discovery.
Abstract not provided.
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
The advent of fabrication techniques like additive manufacturing has focused attention on the considerable variability of material response due to defects and other micro-structural aspects. This variability motivates the development of an enhanced design methodology that incorporates inherent material variability to provide robust predictions of performance. In this work, we develop plasticity models capable of representing the distribution of mechanical responses observed in experiments using traditional plasticity models of the mean response and recently developed uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques. Lastly, we demonstrate that the new method provides predictive realizations that are superior to more traditional ones, and how these UQ techniques can be used in model selection and assessing the quality of calibrated physical parameters.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
We propose a reformulation of the composite tetrahedral finite element first introduced by Thoutireddy et al. By choosing a different numerical integration scheme, we obtain an element that is more accurate than the one proposed in the original formulation. We also show that in the context of Lagrangian approaches, the gradient and projection operators derived from the element reformulation admit fully analytic expressions, which offer a significant improvement in terms of accuracy and computational expense. For plasticity applications, a mean-dilatation approach on top of the underlying Hu–Washizu variational principle proves effective for the representation of isochoric deformations. The performance of the reformulated element is demonstrated by hyperelastic and inelastic calculations. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
We examine four parametrizations of the unit sphere in the context of material stability analysis by means of the singularity of the acoustic tensor. We then propose a Cartesian parametrization for vectors that lie a cube of side length two and use these vectors in lieu of unit normals to test for the loss of the ellipticity condition. This parametrization is then used to construct a tensor akin to the acoustic tensor. It is shown that both of these tensors become singular at the same time and in the same planes in the presence of a material instability. Furthermore, the performance of the Cartesian parametrization is compared against the other parametrizations, with the results of these comparisons showing that in general, the Cartesian parametrization is more robust and more numerically efficient than the others.