Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

We have characterized the three-dimensional evolution of microstructural anisotropy of a family of elastomeric foams during uniaxial compression via in-situ X-ray computed tomography. Flexible polyurethane foam specimens with densities of 136, 160 and 240 kg/m3 were compressed in uniaxial stress tests both parallel and perpendicular to the foam rise direction, to engineering strains exceeding 70%. The uncompressed microstructures show slightly elongated ellipsoidal pores, with elongation aligned parallel to the foam rise direction. The evolution of this microstructural anisotropy during deformation is quantified based on the autocorrelation of the image intensity, and verified via the mean intercept length as well as the shape of individual pores. Trends are consistent across all three methods. In the rise direction, the material remains transversely anisotropic throughout compression. Anisotropy initially decreases with compression, reaches a minimum, then increases up to large strains, followed by a small decrease in anisotropy at the largest strains as pores collapse. Compression perpendicular to the foam rise direction induces secondary anisotropy with respect to the compression axis, in addition to primary anisotropy associated with the foam rise direction. In contrast to compression in the rise direction, primary anisotropy initially increases with compression, and shows a slight decrease at large strains. These surprising non-monotonic trends and qualitative differences in rise and transverse loading are explained based on the compression of initially ellipsoidal pores. Microstructural anisotropy trends reflect macroscopic stress-strain and lateral strain response. These findings provide novel quantitative connections between three-dimensional microstructure and anisotropy in moderate density polymer foams up to large deformation, with important implications for understanding complex three-dimensional states of deformation.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Modeling material and component behavior using finite element analysis (FEA) is critical for modern engineering. One key to a credible model is having an accurate material model, with calibrated model parameters, which describes the constitutive relationship between the deformation and the resulting stress in the material. As such, identifying material model parameters is critical to accurate and predictive FEA. Traditional calibration approaches use only global data (e.g. extensometers and resultant force) and simplified geometries to find the parameters. However, the utilization of rapidly maturing full-field characterization techniques (e.g. Digital Image Correlation (DIC)) with inverse techniques (e.g. the Virtual Feilds Method (VFM)) provide a new, novel and improved method for parameter identification. This LDRD tested that idea: in particular, whether more parameters could be identified per test when using full-field data. The research described in this report successfully proves this hypothesis by comparing the VFM results with traditional calibration methods. Important products of the research include: verified VFM codes for identifying model parameters, a new look at parameter covariance in material model parameter estimation, new validation techniques to better utilize full-field measurements, and an exploration of optimized specimen design for improved data richness.

Traditionally, material identification is performed using global load and displacement data from simple boundary-value problems such as uni-axial tensile and simple shear tests. More recently, however, inverse techniques such as the Virtual Fields Method (VFM) that capitalize on heterogeneous, full-field deformation data have gained popularity. In this work, we have written a VFM code in a finite-deformation framework for calibration of a viscoplastic (i.e. strain-rate dependent) material model for 304L stainless steel. Using simulated experimental data generated via finite-element analysis (FEA), we verified our VFM code and compared the identified parameters with the reference parameters input into the FEA. The identified material model parameters had surprisingly large error compared to the reference parameters, which was traced to parameter covariance and the existence of many essentially equivalent parameter sets. This parameter non-uniqueness and its implications for FEA predictions is discussed in detail. Lastly, we present two strategies to reduce parameter covariance – reduced parametrization of the material model and increased richness of the calibration data – which allow for the recovery of a unique solution.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.