Plenoptic background-oriented schlieren is a diagnostictechnique that enables the measure-ment of three-dimensional refractive gradients by a combination of background-oriented schlieren and a plenoptic light field camera. This plenoptic camera is a modification of a traditional camera via the insertion of an array of microlenses between the imaging lens and digital sensor. This allows the collection of both spatial and angular information on the incoming light rays and therefore provides three-dimensional information about the imaged scene. Background-oriented schlieren requires a relatively simple experimental configurationincludingonlyacameraviewing a patterned background through the density field of interest. By using a plenoptic camera to capture background-oriented schlieren images the optical distortion created by density gradients in three dimensions can be measured. This chapter is intended to review critical developments in plenoptic background-oriented schlieren imaging and provide an outlook for future applications of this measurement technique.
High-speed, optical imaging diagnostics are presented for three-dimensional (3D) quantification of explosively driven metal fragmentation. At early times after detonation, Digital Image Correlation (DIC) provides non-contact measures of 3D case velocities, strains, and strain rates, while a proposed stereo imaging configuration quantifies in-flight fragment masses and velocities at later times. Experiments are performed using commercially obtained RP-80 detonators from Teledyne RISI, which are shown to create a reproducible fragment field at the benchtop scale. DIC measurements are compared with 3D simulations, which have been ‘leveled’ to match the spatial resolution of DIC. Results demonstrate improved ability to identify predicted quantities-of-interest that fall outside of measurement uncertainty and shot-to-shot variability. Similarly, video measures of fragment trajectories and masses allow rapid experimental repetition and provide correlated fragment size-velocity measurements. Measured and simulated fragment mass distributions are shown to agree within confidence bounds, while some statistically meaningful differences are observed between the measured and predicted conditionally averaged fragment velocities. Together these techniques demonstrate new opportunities to improve future model validation.
Detonation of explosive devices produces extremely hazardous fragments and hot, luminous fireballs. Prior experimental investigations of these post-detonation environments have primarily considered devices containing hundreds of grams of explosives. While relevant to many applications, such large- scale testing also significantly restricts experimental diagnostics and provides limited data for model validation. As an alternative, the current work proposes experiments and simulations of the fragmentation and fireballs from commercial detonators with less than a gram of high explosive. As demonstrated here, reduced experimental hazards and increased optical access significantly expand the viability of advanced imaging and laser diagnostics. Notable developments include the first known validation of MHz-rate optical fragment tracking and the first ever Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering (CARS) measures of post-detonation fireball temperatures. While certainly not replacing the need for full-scale verification testing, this work demonstrates new opportunities to accelerate developments of diagnostics and predictive models of post-detonation environments.
Three ultra-high-speed, 10 MHz, cameras imaged the time-resolved decay of laser-induced incandescence (LII) from soot in a turbulent non-premixed ethylene jet flame. Cameras were equipped with a stereoscope allowing each CMOS array to capture two separate views of the flame. The resulting six views were reconstructed into a volumetric soot decay series using commercially available DaVis tomographic software by LaVision. Primary soot particle sizes were estimated from the decay time history on a per voxel basis by comparing measured signals to an LII model. Experimentally quantified soot particle sizes agree with existing predictions and previous measurements.
This work details the development of an algorithm to determine 3D position and in plane size and shape of particles by exploiting the perspective shift capabilities of a plenoptic camera combined with stereo-matching methods. This algorithm is validated using an experimental data set previously examined in a refocusing based particle location study in which a static particle field is translated to provide known depth displacements at varied magnification and object distances. Examination of these results indicates increased accuracy and precision is achieved compared to a previous refocusing based method at significantly reduced computational costs. The perspective shift method is further applied to fragment localization and sizing in a lab scale fragmenting explosive.
With the growth of light field imaging as an emerging diagnostic tool for the measurement of 3D particle fields, various algorithms for 3D particle measurements have been developed. These methods have exploited both the computational refocusing and perspective-shift capabilities of plenoptic imaging. This work continues the development of a 3D particle location method based on perspective-shifted plenoptic images. Specific focus is placed on adaptations that provide increased robustness for variations in and measurement of size and shape characteristics, thus allowing measurements of fragment fields. An experimental data set of non-spherical fragment simulants is studied to examine the dependency of the uncertainty of this perspective-shift based processing method on particle shape and the uncertainty of size measurements of fragments. Synthetic data sets are examined to provide metrics of the relationship between measurement uncertainty that can be achieved using this method, particle density, and processing time requirements.
The volumetric calibration of a plenoptic camera is explored to correct for inaccuracies due to real-world lens distortions and thin-lens assumptions in current processing methods. Two methods of volumetric calibration based on a polynomial mapping function that does not require knowledge of specific lens parameters are presented and compared to a calibration based on thin-lens assumptions. The first method, volumetric dewarping, is executed by creation of a volumetric representation of a scene using the thin-lens assumptions, which is then corrected in post-processing using a polynomial mapping function. The second method, direct light-field calibration, uses the polynomial mapping in creation of the initial volumetric representation to relate locations in object space directly to image sensor locations. The accuracy and feasibility of these methods is examined experimentally by capturing images of a known dot card at a variety of depths. Results suggest that use of a 3D polynomial mapping function provides a significant increase in reconstruction accuracy and that the achievable accuracy is similar using either polynomial-mapping-based method. Additionally, direct light-field calibration provides significant computational benefits by eliminating some intermediate processing steps found in other methods. Finally, the flexibility of this method is shown for a nonplanar calibration.
Plenoptic imaging is a 3D imaging technique that has been applied for quantification of 3D particle locations and sizes. This work experimentally evaluates the accuracy and precision of such measurements by investigating a static particle field translated to known displacements. Measured 3D displacement values are determined from sharpness metrics applied to volumetric representations of the particle field created using refocused plenoptic images, corrected using a recently developed calibration technique. Comparison of measured and known displacements for many thousands of particles allows for evaluation of measurement uncertainty. Mean displacement error, as a measure of accuracy, is shown to agree with predicted spatial resolution over the entire measurement domain, indicating robustness of the calibration methods. On the other hand, variation in the error, as a measure of precision, fluctuates as a function of particle depth in the optical direction. Error shows the smallest variation within the predicted depth of field of the plenoptic camera, with a gradual increase outside this range. The quantitative uncertainty values provided here can guide future measurement optimization and will serve as useful metrics for design of improved processing algorithms.
Plenoptic imaging is a promising emerging technology for single-camera, 3D diagnostics of particle fields. In this work, recent developments towards quantitative measurements of particle size, positions, and velocities are discussed. First, the technique is proven viable with measurements of the particle field generated by the impact of a water drop on a thin film of water. Next, well cont rolled experiments are used to verify diagnostic uncertainty. Finally, an example is presented of 3D plenoptic imaging of a laboratory scale, explosively generated fragment field.
Due to the increasing prevalence of plenoptic imaging it is necessary to explore the volumetric calibration of this imaging system to correct for inaccuracies due to real world lens distortions and thin lens assumptions in current processing methods. An overview of plenoptic imaging is given and methods of volumetric calibration of a plenoptic camera based on a polynomial mapping function are presented. The accuracy and feasibility of these methods are examined. Preliminary results suggest that use of a 3D polynomial mapping function provides a significant increase in reconstruction accuracy. Depth accuracy of particle location in calibrated volumes was measured to be accurate within 1% of the calculated volume size.
Digital in-line holography (DIH) and plenoptic photography are two techniques for single-shot, volumetric measurement of 3D particle fields. Here we present a comparison of the two methods by applying plenoptic imaging to experimental configurations that have been previously investigated with DIH. These experiments include the tracking of secondary droplets from the impact of a water drop on a thin film of water and tracking of pellets from a shotgun. Both plenoptic imaging and DIH successfully quantify the 3D nature of these particle fields. This includes measurement of the 3D particle position, individual particle sizes, and three-component velocity vectors. For the initial processing methods presented here, both techniques give out-of-plane positional accuracy of approximately 1-2 particle diameters. For a fixed image sensor, digital holography achieves higher effective in-plane spatial resolutions. However, collimated and coherent illumination makes holography susceptible to image distortion through index of refraction gradients, as demonstrated in the shotgun experiments. In contrast, plenoptic imaging allows for a simpler experimental configuration and, due to the use of diffuse, white-light illumination, plenoptic imaging is less susceptible to image distortion in the shotgun experiments.
Digital in-line holography and plenoptic photography are two techniques for single-shot, volumetric measurement of 3D particle fields. Here we present a preliminary comparison of the two methods by applying plenoptic imaging to experimental configurations that have been previously investigated with digital in-line holography. These experiments include the tracking of secondary droplets from the impact of a water drop on a thin film of water and tracking of pellets from a shotgun. Both plenoptic imaging and digital in-line holography successfully quantify the 3D nature of these particle fields. This includes measurement of the 3D particle position, individual particle sizes, and three-component velocity vectors. For the initial processing methods presented here, both techniques give out-of-plane positional accuracy of approximately 1-2 particle diameters. For a fixed image sensor, digital holography achieves higher effective in-plane spatial resolutions. However, collimated and coherent illumination makes holography susceptible to image distortion through index of refraction gradients, as demonstrated in the shotgun experiments. On the other hand, plenotpic imaging allows for a simpler experimental configuration. Furthermore, due to the use of diffuse, white-light illumination, plenoptic imaging is less susceptible to image distortion in the shotgun experiments. Additional work is needed to better quantify sources of uncertainty, particularly in the plenoptic experiments, as well as develop data processing methodologies optimized for the plenoptic measurement.
Digital in-line holography and plenoptic photography are two techniques for single-shot, volumetric measurement of 3D particle fields. Here we present a preliminary comparison of the two methods by applying plenoptic imaging to experimental configurations that have been previously investigated with digital in-line holography. These experiments include the tracking of secondary droplets from the impact of a water drop on a thin film of water and tracking of pellets from a shotgun. Both plenoptic imaging and digital in-line holography successfully quantify the 3D nature of these particle fields. This includes measurement of the 3D particle position, individual particle sizes, and three-component velocity vectors. For the initial processing methods presented here, both techniques give out-of-plane positional accuracy of approximately 1-2 particle diameters. For a fixed image sensor, digital holography achieves higher effective in-plane spatial resolutions. However, collimated and coherent illumination makes holography susceptible to image distortion through index of refraction gradients, as demonstrated in the shotgun experiments. On the other hand, plenotpic imaging allows for a simpler experimental configuration. Furthermore, due to the use of diffuse, white-light illumination, plenoptic imaging is less susceptible to image distortion in the shotgun experiments. Additional work is needed to better quantify sources of uncertainty, particularly in the plenoptic experiments, as well as develop data processing methodologies optimized for the plenoptic measurement.