Publications

Results 1–50 of 87

Search results

Jump to search filters

Mid-circuit Measurement & Branching in QSCOUT: A Ping-Pong Teleportation Exemplar Program

Landahl, Andrew J.; Rudinger, Kenneth M.; Russo, Antonio E.; Ruzic, Brandon P.; Yale, Christopher G.; Clark, Susan M.

This document is intended to help users program the new mid-circuit measurement (MCM) and classical branching capabilities of the Quantum Scientific Computing Open User Testbed (QSCOUT). Here, we present and explain an exemplar “ping-pong teleportation” program that makes repeated MCM and branching calls. The program is written in Jaqal, the quantum assembly language used by QSCOUT. This document is intended to accompany a companion Jupyter notebook Exemplar_one_bit_teleportation_pingpong.ipynb.

More Details

QSCOUT Progress Report, June 2022 [Quantum Scientific Computing Open User Testbed]

Clark, Susan M.; Norris, Haley; Landahl, Andrew J.; Yale, Christopher G.; Lobser, Daniel; Van Der Wall, Jay W.; Revelle, Melissa C.

Quantum information processing has reached an inflection point, transitioning from proof-of-principle scientific experiments to small, noisy quantum processors. To accelerate this process and eventually move to fault-tolerant quantum computing, it is necessary to provide the scientific community with access to whitebox testbed systems. The Quantum Scientific Computing Open User Testbed (QSCOUT) provides scientists unique access to an innovative system to help advance quantum computing science.

More Details

Jaqal the Quantum Assembly Language for QSCOUT

Landahl, Andrew J.; Lobser, Daniel; Morrison, Benjamin; Rudinger, Kenneth M.; Russo, Antonio E.; Van Der Wall, Jay W.; Maunz, Peter L.W.

QSCOUT is the Quantum Scientific Computing Open User Testbed, a trapped-ion quantum computer testbed realized at Sandia National Laboratories on behalf of the Department of Energy's Office of Science and its Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) program.

More Details

ASCR Workshop on Quantum Computing for Science

Aspuru-Guzik, Alan; Van Dam, Wim; Farhi, Edward; Gaitan, Frank; Humble, Travis; Jordan, Stephen; Landahl, Andrew J.; Love, Peter; Lucas, Robert; Preskill, John; Muller, Richard P.; Svore, Krysta; Wiebe, Nathan; Williams, Carl

This report details the findings of the DOE ASCR Workshop on Quantum Computing for Science that was organized to assess the viability of quantum computing technologies to meet the computational requirements of the DOE’s science and energy mission, and to identify the potential impact of quantum technologies. The workshop was held on February 17-18, 2015, in Bethesda, MD, to solicit input from members of the quantum computing community. The workshop considered models of quantum computation and programming environments, physical science applications relevant to DOE's science mission as well as quantum simulation, and applied mathematics topics including potential quantum algorithms for linear algebra, graph theory, and machine learning. This report summarizes these perspectives into an outlook on the opportunities for quantum computing to impact problems relevant to the DOE’s mission as well as the additional research required to bring quantum computing to the point where it can have such impact.

More Details

Benchmarking Adiabatic Quantum Optimization for Complex Network Analysis

Parekh, Ojas D.; Wendt, Jeremy; Shulenburger, Luke N.; Landahl, Andrew J.; Moussa, J.E.; Aidun, John B.

We lay the foundation for a benchmarking methodology for assessing current and future quantum computers. We pose and begin addressing fundamental questions about how to fairly compare computational devices at vastly different stages of technological maturity. We critically evaluate and offer our own contributions to current quantum benchmarking efforts, in particular those involving adiabatic quantum computation and the Adiabatic Quantum Optimizers produced by D-Wave Systems, Inc. We find that the performance of D-Wave's Adiabatic Quantum Optimizers scales roughly on par with classical approaches for some hard combinatorial optimization problems; however, architectural limitations of D-Wave devices present a significant hurdle in evaluating real-world applications. In addition to identifying and isolating such limitations, we develop algorithmic tools for circumventing these limitations on future D-Wave devices, assuming they continue to grow and mature at an exponential rate for the next several years.

More Details
Results 1–50 of 87
Results 1–50 of 87