Publications

Abstract not provided.

We describe and analyze a variance reduction approach for Monte Carlo (MC) sampling that accelerates the estimation of statistics of computationally expensive simulation models using an ensemble of models with lower cost. These lower cost models — which are typically lower fidelity with unknown statistics — are used to reduce the variance in statistical estimators relative to a MC estimator with equivalent cost. We derive the conditions under which our proposed approximate control variate framework recovers existing multifidelity variance reduction schemes as special cases. We demonstrate that existing recursive/nested strategies are suboptimal because they use the additional low-fidelity models only to efficiently estimate the unknown mean of the first low-fidelity model. As a result, they cannot achieve variance reduction beyond that of a control variate estimator that uses a single low-fidelity model with known mean. However, there often exists about an order-of-magnitude gap between the maximum achievable variance reduction using all low-fidelity models and that achieved by a single low-fidelity model with known mean. We show that our proposed approach can exploit this gap to achieve greater variance reduction by using non-recursive sampling schemes. The proposed strategy reduces the total cost of accurately estimating statistics, especially in cases where only low-fidelity simulation models are accessible for additional evaluations. Several analytic examples and an example with a hyperbolic PDE describing elastic wave propagation in heterogeneous media are used to illustrate the main features of the methodology.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Truly predictive numerical simulations can only be obtained by performing Uncertainty Quantification. However, many realistic engineering applications require extremely complex and computationally expensive high-fidelity numerical simulations for their accurate performance characterization. Very often the combination of complex physical models and extreme operative conditions can easily lead to hundreds of uncertain parameters that need to be propagated through high-fidelity codes. Under these circumstances, a single fidelity uncertainty quantification approach, i.e. a workflow that only uses high-fidelity simulations, is unfeasible due to its prohibitive overall computational cost. To overcome this difficulty, in recent years multifidelity strategies emerged and gained popularity. Their core idea is to combine simulations with varying levels of fidelity/accuracy in order to obtain estimators or surrogates that can yield the same accuracy of their single fidelity counterparts at a much lower computational cost. This goal is usually accomplished by defining a priori a sequence of discretization levels or physical modeling assumptions that can be used to decrease the complexity of a numerical model realization and thus its computational cost. Less attention has been dedicated to low-fidelity models that can be built directly from a small number of available high-fidelity simulations. In this work we focus our attention on reduced order models (ROMs). Our main goal in this work is to investigate the combination of multifidelity uncertainty quantification and ROMs in order to evaluate the possibility to obtain an efficient framework for propagating uncertainties through expensive numerical codes. We focus our attention on sampling-based multifidelity approaches, like the multifidelity control variate, and we consider several scenarios for a numerical test problem, namely the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, for which the efficiency of the multifidelity-ROM estimator is compared to the standard (single-fidelity) Monte Carlo approach.

Wind energy is stochastic in nature; the prediction of aerodynamic quantities and loads relevant to wind energy applications involves modeling the interaction of a range of physics over many scales for many different cases. These predictions require a range of model fidelity, as predictive models that include the interaction of atmospheric and wind turbine wake physics can take weeks to solve on institutional high performance computing systems. In order to quantify the uncertainty in predictions of wind energy quantities with multiple models, researchers at Sandia National Laboratories have applied Multilevel-Multifidelity methods. A demonstration study was completed using simulations of a NREL 5MW rotor in an atmospheric boundary layer with wake interaction. The flow was simulated with two models of disparate fidelity; an actuator line wind plant large-eddy scale model, Nalu, using several mesh resolutions in combination with a lower fidelity model, OpenFAST. Uncertainties in the flow conditions and actuator forces were propagated through the model using Monte Carlo sampling to estimate the velocity defect in the wake and forces on the rotor. Coarse-mesh simulations were leveraged along with the lower-fidelity flow model to reduce the variance of the estimator, and the resulting Multilevel-Multifidelity strategy demonstrated a substantial improvement in estimator efficiency compared to the standard Monte Carlo method.

SNOWPAC (Stochastic Nonlinear Optimization With Path-Augmented Constraints) is a method for stochastic nonlinear constrained derivative-free optimization. For such problems, it extends the path-augmented constraints framework introduced by the deterministic optimization method NOWPAC and uses a noise-adapted trust region approach and Gaussian processes for noise reduction. In recent developments, SNOWPAC is available in the DAKOTA framework which offers a highly flexible interface to couple the optimizer with different sampling strategies or surrogate models. In this paper we discuss details of SNOWPAC and demonstrate the coupling with DAKOTA. We showcase the approach by presenting design optimization results of a shape in a 2D supersonic duct. This simulation is supposed to imitate the behavior of the flow in a SCRAMJET simulation but at a much lower computational cost. Additionally different mesh or model fidelities can be tested. Thus, it serves as a convenient test case before moving to costly SCRAMJET computations. Here, we study deterministic results and results obtained by introducing uncertainty on inflow parameters. As sampling strategies we compare classical Monte Carlo sampling with multilevel Monte Carlo approaches for which we developed new error estimators. All approaches show a reasonable optimization of the design over the objective while maintaining or seeking feasibility. Furthermore, we achieve significant reductions in computational cost by using multilevel approaches that combine solutions from different grid resolutions.

Bayesian optimization (BO) is an efficient and flexible global optimization framework that is applicable to a very wide range of engineering applications. To leverage the capability of the classical BO, many extensions, including multi-objective, multi-fidelity, parallelization, and latent-variable modeling, have been proposed to address the limitations of the classical BO framework. In this work, we propose a novel multi-objective (MO) extension, called srMOBO-3GP, to solve the MO optimization problems in a sequential setting. Three different Gaussian processes (GPs) are stacked together, where each of the GP is assigned with a different task: the first GP is used to approximate a single-objective computed from the MO definition, the second GP is used to learn the unknown constraints, and the third GP is used to learn the uncertain Pareto frontier. At each iteration, a MO augmented Tchebycheff function converting MO to single-objective is adopted and extended with a regularized ridge term, where the regularization is introduced to smooth the single-objective function. Finally, we couple the third GP along with the classical BO framework to explore the richness and diversity of the Pareto frontier by the exploitation and exploration acquisition function. The proposed framework is demonstrated using several numerical benchmark functions, as well as a thermomechanical finite element model for flip-chip package design optimization.

Uncertainty is present in all wind energy problems of interest, but quantifying its impact for wind energy research, design and analysis applications often requires the collection of large ensembles of numerical simulations. These predictions require a range of model fidelity as predictive models, that include the interaction of atmospheric and wind turbine wake physics, can require weeks or months to solve on institutional high-performance computing systems. The need for these extremely expensive numerical simulations extends the computational resource requirements usually associated with uncertainty quantification analysis. To alleviate the computational burden, we propose here to adopt several Multilevel-Multifidelity sampling strategies that we compare for a realistic test case. A demonstration study was completed using simulations of a V27 turbine at Sandia National Laboratories’ SWiFT facility in a neutral atmospheric boundary layer. The flow was simulated with three models of disparate fidelity. OpenFAST with TurbSim was used stand-alone as the most computationally-efficient, lower-fidelity model. The computational fluid dynamics code Nalu-Wind was used for large eddy simulations with both medium-fidelity actuator disk and high-fidelity actuator line models, with various mesh resolutions. In an uncertainty quantification study, we considered five different turbine properties as random parameters: yaw offset, generator torque constant, collective blade pitch, gearbox efficiency and blade mass. For all quantities of interest, the Multilevel-Multifidelity estimators demonstrated greater efficiency compared to standard and multilevel Monte Carlo estimators.

Truly predictive numerical simulations can only be obtained by performing Uncertainty Quantification. However, many realistic engineering applications require extremely complex and computationally expensive high-fidelity numerical simulations for their accurate performance characterization. Very often the combination of complex physical models and extreme operative conditions can easily lead to hundreds of uncertain parameters that need to be propagated through high-fidelity codes. Under these circumstances, a single fidelity uncertainty quantification approach, i.e. a workflow that only uses high-fidelity simulations, is unfeasible due to its prohibitive overall computational cost. To overcome this difficulty, in recent years multifidelity strategies emerged and gained popularity. Their core idea is to combine simulations with varying levels of fidelity/accuracy in order to obtain estimators or surrogates that can yield the same accuracy of their single fidelity counterparts at a much lower computational cost. This goal is usually accomplished by defining a priori a sequence of discretization levels or physical modeling assumptions that can be used to decrease the complexity of a numerical model realization and thus its computational cost. Less attention has been dedicated to low-fidelity models that can be built directly from a small number of available high-fidelity simulations. In this work we focus our attention on reduced order models (ROMs). Our main goal in this work is to investigate the combination of multifidelity uncertainty quantification and ROMs in order to evaluate the possibility to obtain an efficient framework for propagating uncertainties through expensive numerical codes. We focus our attention on sampling-based multifidelity approaches, like the multifidelity control variate, and we consider several scenarios for a numerical test problem, namely the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, for which the efficiency of the multifidelity-ROM estimator is compared to the standard (single-fidelity) Monte Carlo approach.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Uncertainty quantification is recognized as a fundamental task to obtain predictive numerical simulations. However, many realistic engineering applications require complex and computationally expensive high-fidelity numerical simulations for the accurate characterization of the system responses. Moreover, complex physical models and extreme operative conditions can easily lead to hundreds of uncertain parameters that need to be propagated through high-fidelity codes. Under these circumstances, a single fidelity approach, i.e. a workflow that only uses high-fidelity simulations to perform the uncertainty quantification task, is unfeasible due to the prohibitive overall computational cost. In recent years, multifidelity strategies have been introduced to overcome this issue. The core idea of this family of methods is to combine simulations with varying levels of fidelity/accuracy in order to obtain the multifidelity estimators or surrogates with the same accuracy of their single fidelity counterparts at a much lower computational cost. This goal is usually accomplished by defining a prioria sequence of discretization levels or physical modeling assumptions that can be used to decrease the complexity of a numerical realization and thus its computational cost. However ,less attention has been dedicated to low-fidelity models that can be built directly from the small number of high-fidelity simulations available. In this work we focus our attention on Reduced-Order Models that can be considered a particular class of data-driven approaches. Our main goal is to explore the combination of multifidelity uncertainty quantification and reduced-order models to obtain an efficient framework for propagating uncertainties through expensive numerical codes.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.