Publications

10 Results

Search results

Jump to search filters

CI-MOR Final Report: Analysis and Validation of Critical Infrastructure Models using Model Order Reduction

Hart, William E.; Johnson, Emma S.; Phillips, Cynthia A.; Aquino, Alejandro; Ammari, Bashar; Arguello, Bryan; Davis, Soren A.; Gearhart, Jared L.; Laird, Carl D.; Mattes, Connor L.; Molzahn, Daniel; Pinar, Ali; Viens, Matthew P.

This report summarizes the research and capabilities developed as part of the project “Analysis and Validation of Critical Infrastructure Models using Model Order Reduction” (CI-MOR) LDRD project. CI-MOR research enables the solution of large, complex optimization models that naturally arise in national security challenges involving critical infrastructures. Specifically, CI-MOR researchers developed methods to (1) rigorously approximate complex, nonlinear optimization formulations, (2) identify alternative near-optimal solutions, (3) accelerate optimization workflows used for complex applications, and (4) rigorously integrate domain knowledge in stochastic-process models. This report provides an overview of the research done in CI-MOR, and we describe application exemplars used to illustrate CI-MOR capabilities. Furthermore, we describe the software developed by CI-MOR that researchers can leverage to analyze new applications.

More Details

Science & Engineering of Cyber Security by Uncertainty Quantification and Rigorous Experimentation (SECURE) HANDBOOK

Pinar, Ali P.; Tarman, Thomas D.; Swiler, Laura P.; Gearhart, Jared L.; Hart, Derek; Vugrin, Eric; Cruz, Gerardo J.; Arguello, Bryan; Geraci, Gianluca; Debusschere, Bert J.; Hanson, Seth T.; Outkin, Alexander V.; Thorpe, Jamie E.; Hart, William E.; Sahakian, Meghan A.; Gabert, Kasimir G.; Glatter, Casey; Johnson, Emma S.; Punla-Green, and She?Ifa S.

Abstract not provided.

Science and Engineering of Cybersecurity by Uncertainty quantification and Rigorous Experimentation (SECURE) (Final Report)

Pinar, Ali P.; Tarman, Thomas D.; Swiler, Laura P.; Gearhart, Jared L.; Hart, Derek; Vugrin, Eric; Cruz, Gerardo J.; Arguello, Bryan; Geraci, Gianluca; Debusschere, Bert J.; Hanson, Seth T.; Outkin, Alexander V.; Thorpe, Jamie E.; Hart, William E.; Sahakian, Meghan A.; Gabert, Kasimir G.; Glatter, Casey; Johnson, Emma S.; Punla-Green, She'Ifa'

This report summarizes the activities performed as part of the Science and Engineering of Cybersecurity by Uncertainty quantification and Rigorous Experimentation (SECURE) Grand Challenge LDRD project. We provide an overview of the research done in this project, including work on cyber emulation, uncertainty quantification, and optimization. We present examples of integrated analyses performed on two case studies: a network scanning/detection study and a malware command and control study. We highlight the importance of experimental workflows and list references of papers and presentations developed under this project. We outline lessons learned and suggestions for future work.

More Details

Evaluating Moving Target Defense with PLADD

Jones, Stephen T.; Outkin, Alexander V.; Gearhart, Jared L.; Hobbs, Jacob; Siirola, John D.; Phillips, Cynthia A.; Verzi, Stephen J.; Tauritz, Daniel; Mulder, Samuel A.; Naugle, Asmeret

This project evaluates the effectiveness of moving target defense (MTD) techniques using a new game we have designed, called PLADD, inspired by the game FlipIt [28]. PLADD extends FlipIt by incorporating what we believe are key MTD concepts. We have analyzed PLADD and proven the existence of a defender strategy that pushes a rational attacker out of the game, demonstrated how limited the strategies available to an attacker are in PLADD, and derived analytic expressions for the expected utility of the game’s players in multiple game variants. We have created an algorithm for finding a defender’s optimal PLADD strategy. We show that in the special case of achieving deterrence in PLADD, MTD is not always cost effective and that its optimal deployment may shift abruptly from not using MTD at all to using it as aggressively as possible. We believe our effort provides basic, fundamental insights into the use of MTD, but conclude that a truly practical analysis requires model selection and calibration based on real scenarios and empirical data. We propose several avenues for further inquiry, including (1) agents with adaptive capabilities more reflective of real world adversaries, (2) the presence of multiple, heterogeneous adversaries, (3) computational game theory-based approaches such as coevolution to allow scaling to the real world beyond the limitations of analytical analysis and classical game theory, (4) mapping the game to real-world scenarios, (5) taking player risk into account when designing a strategy (in addition to expected payoff), (6) improving our understanding of the dynamic nature of MTD-inspired games by using a martingale representation, defensive forecasting, and techniques from signal processing, and (7) using adversarial games to develop inherently resilient cyber systems.

More Details

Conceptual Framework for Developing Resilience Metrics for the Electricity, Oil, and Gas Sectors in the United States

Watson, Jean-Paul; Guttromson, Ross; Silva-Monroy, Cesar A.; Jeffers, Robert; Jones, Katherine A.; Ellison, James; Rath, Charles; Gearhart, Jared L.; Jones, Dean A.; Corbet Jr., Thomas F.; Hanley, Charles; La Jenkins, Tonya N.

This report has been written for the Department of Energy’s Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Office to inform their writing of the Quadrennial Energy Review in the area of energy resilience. The topics of measuring and increasing energy resilience are addressed, including definitions, means of measuring, and analytic methodologies that can be used to make decisions for policy, infrastructure planning, and operations. A risk-based framework is presented which provides a standard definition of a resilience metric. Additionally, a process is identified which explains how the metrics can be applied. Research and development is articulated that will further accelerate the resilience of energy infrastructures.

More Details
10 Results
10 Results
Top