Publications

Abstract not provided.

The safety case for deep borehole disposal of nuclear wastes contains a safety strategy, an assessment basis, and a safety assessment. The safety strategy includes strategies for management, siting and design, and assessment. The assessment basis considers site selection, pre-closure, and post-closure, which includes waste and engineered barriers, the geosphere/natural barriers, and the biosphere and surface environment. The safety assessment entails a pre-closure safety analysis, a post-closure performance assessment, and confidence enhancement analyses. This paper outlines the assessment basis and safety assessment aspects of a deep borehole disposal safety case. The safety case presented here is specific to deep borehole disposal of Cs and Sr capsules, but is generally applicable to other waste forms, such as spent nuclear fuel. The safety assessments for pre-closure and post-closure are briefly summarized from other sources; key issues for confidence enhancement are described in greater detail. These confidence enhancement analyses require building the technical basis for geologically old, reducing, highly saline brines at the depth of waste emplacement, and using reactive-transport codes to predict their movement in post-closure. The development and emplacement of borehole seals above the waste emplacement zone is also important to confidence enhancement.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

This report describes the current status of the safety case for the deep borehole disposal (DBD) concept. It builds on the safety case presented in Freeze et al. (2016), presenting new information and identifying additional information needs for specific safety case elements. At this preliminary phase of development, the DBD safety case focuses on the generic feasibility of the DBD concept. It is based on potential system designs, waste forms, engineering, and geologic conditions; however, no specific site or regulatory framework exists. Updated information is provided for the following safety case elements: (1) pre-closure basis and safety analysis, (2) post-closure basis and performance assessment, and (3) confidence enhancement. This research was performed as part of the deep borehole field test (DBFT). Based on revised U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) priorities in mid-2017, the DBFT and other research related to a DBD option was discontinued; ongoing work and documentation were closed out by the end of fiscal year (FY) 2017. This report was initiated as part of the DBFT and documented as an incomplete draft at the end of FY 2017. The report was finalized by Sandia National Laboratories in FY2018 without DOE funding, subsequent to the termination of the DBFT, and published in FY2019.

The U.S. Department of Energy is conducting research and development on generic concepts for disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste in multiple lithologies, including salt, crystalline (granite/metamorphic), and argillaceous (clay/shale) host rock. These investigations benefit greatly from international experience gained in disposal programs in many countries around the world. The focus of this study is the post-closure degradation and radionuclide-release rates for tristructural-isotropic (TRISO) coated particle spent fuels for various generic geologic repository environments.1,2,3 The TRISO particle coatings provide safety features during and after reactor operations, with the SiC layer representing the primary barrier. Three mechanisms that may lead to release of radionuclides from the TRISO particles are: (1) helium pressure buildup4 that may eventually rupture the SiC layer, (2) diffusive transport through the layers (solid-state diffusion in reactor, aqueous diffusion in porous media at repository conditions), and (3) corrosion5 of the layers in groundwater/brine. For TRISO particles in a graphite fuel element, the degradation in an oxidizing geologic repository was concluded to be directly dependent on the oxidative corrosion rate of the graphite matrix4, which was analyzed as much slower than SiC layer corrosion processes. However, accumulated physical damage to the graphite fuel element may decrease its post-closure barrier capability more rapidly. Our initial performance model focuses on the TRISO particles and includes SiC failure from pressure increase via alpha-decay helium, as exacerbated by SiC layer corrosion5. This corrosion mechanism is found to be much faster than solid-state diffusion at repository temperatures but includes no benefit of protection by the other outer layers, which may prolong lifetime. Our current model enhancements include constraining the material properties of the layers for porous media diffusion analyses. In addition to evaluating the SiC layer porosity structure, this work focuses on the pyrolytic carbon layers (inner/outer-IPyC/OPyC) layers, and the graphite compact, which are to be analyzed with the SiC layer in two modes: (a) intact SiC barrier until corrosion failure and (b) SiC with porous media transport. Our detailed performance analyses will consider these processes together with uncertainties in the properties of the layers to assess radionuclide release from TRISO particles and their graphite compacts.

Abstract not provided.

TRISO nuclear fuel particles that are less than 1 mm in diameter are designed with multiple barrier layers to retain fission products both during reactor operations and for long-term geological disposal. The primary barrier is a 35 μm thick silicon carbide (SiC-a highly impermeable semi-metal) layer for which data are available on the diffusion of short-lived fission products at high temperatures (> 1000 °C). However, for a geological repository, this layer may contact brine and hence corrode even at ambient temperatures. As an initial approach to assess the effectiveness of the SiC barrier for geological repositories, ranges of fission product diffusivities and corrosion rates for SiC are modeled concurrently with the simultaneous effect of radioactive decay. Using measured corrosion rates of SiC, if the diffusivity is more than about 10^-20 m²/s, fission product releases may occur before the SiC barrier has corroded to the point of breach. For diffusivities less than about 10^-21m² /s there may not be significant diffusional releases prior to SiC barrier removal/breach by corrosion. This work shows the importance of estimating diffusivities in SiC at geological repository temperatures, and highlights the relevance of evaluating the porosity/permeability evolution of the SiC layer in a geologic environment.

This report represents completion of milestone deliverable M2SF-18SNO10309013 "Inventory and Waste Characterization Status Report and OWL Update that reports on FY2018 activities for the work package (WP) SF-18SNO1030901. This report provides the detailed final information for completed FY2018 work activities for WP SF-18SN01030901, and a summary of priorities for FY2019. This status report on FY2018 activities includes evaluations of waste form characteristics and waste form performance models, updates to the OWL development, and descriptions of the two planned management processes for the OWL. Updates to the OWL include an updated user's guide, additions to the OWL database content for wastes and waste forms, results of the Beta testing and changes implemented from it. There are two processes being planned in FY2018, which will be implemented in FY2019. One process covers methods for interfacing with the DOE SNF DB (DOE 2007) at INL on the numerous entries for DOE managed SNF, and the other process covers the management of updates to, and version control/archiving of, the OWL database. In FY2018, we have pursued three studies to evaluate/redefine waste form characteristics and/or performance models. First characteristic isotopic ratios for various waste forms included in postclosure performance studies are being evaluated to delineate isotope ratio tags that quantitatively identify each particular waste form. This evaluation arose due to questions regarding the relative contributions of radionuclides from disparate waste forms in GDSA results, particularly, radionuclide contributions of DOE-managed SNF vs HLW glass. In our second study we are evaluating the bases of glass waste degradation rate models to the HIP calcine waste form. The HIP calcine may likely be a ceramic matrix material, with multiple ceramic phases with/without a glass phase. The ceramic phases are likely to have different degradation performance from the glass portion. The distribution of radionuclides among those various phases may also be a factor in the radionuclide release rates. Additionally, we have an ongoing investigation of the performance behavior of TRISO particle fuels and are developing a stochastic model for the degradation of those fuels that accounts for simultaneous corrosion of the silicon carbide (SiC) layer and radionuclide diffusion through it. The detailed model of the TRISO particles themselves, will be merged with models of the degradation behavior(s) of the graphite matrix (either prismatic compacts or spherical "pebbles") containing the particles and the hexagonal graphite elements holding the compacts.

This report summarizes the 2018 fiscal year (FY18) field, laboratory, and modeling work funded by the US Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) Spent Fuel and Waste Science & Technology (SFWST) campaign as part of the Sandia National Laboratories Salt Research and Development (R&D) and Salt International work packages. This report satisfies level-two milestone M2SF-18SNO10303031and comprises three related but stand-alone sections. The first section summarizes the programmatic progress made to date in the DOE-NE salt program and its goals going forward. The second section presents brine composition modeling and laboratory activities related to salt evaporation experiments, which will be used to interpret data collected during the heater test. The third section presents theoretical and numerical modeling work done to investigate the effects brine composition have on dihedral angle and the permeability of salt.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

This report provides an update to Sassani et al. (2016) and includes: (1) an updated set of inputs (Sections 2.3) on various additional waste forms (WF) covering both DOE-managed spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and DOE-managed (as) high-level waste (HLW) for use in the inventory represented in the geologic disposal safety analyses (GDSA); (2) summaries of evaluations initiated to refine specific characteristics of particular WF for future use (Section 2.4); (3) updated development status of the Online Waste Library (OWL) database (Section 3.1.2) and an updated user guide to OWL (Section 3.1.3); and (4) status updates (Section 3.2) for the OWL inventory content, data entry checking process, and external OWL BETA testing initiated in fiscal year 2017.

This report provides (1) an updated set of inputs (Sections 1 through 4) on various additional waste forms (WF) for the generic Defense Waste Repository (DWR) inventory represented in the generic disposal system analyses (GDSA); (2) summaries of evaluations initiated to refine particular characteristics of particular WF for future use (Section 5); and (3) status updates (Section 6) for the Online Waste Library (OWL) inventory content, data entry checking process, and external OWL BETA testing initiated in fiscal year 2017. As such, this report represents completion of both deliverables M3SF-17SNO10501022 (SFWD-SFWST-2017-000047 — this actual report) and M4SF-17SN010501012 (SFWD-SFWST-2017- 000112 — to be completed by reference to the first milestone report in the PICSNE system).

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The Deep Borehole Field Test (DBFT) is a planned multi-year project led by the US Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy to drill two boreholes to 5 km total depth into crystalline basement in the continental US. The purpose of the first characterization borehole is to demonstrate the ability to characterize in situ formation fluids through sampling and perform downhole hydraulic testing to demonstrate groundwater from 3 to 5 km depth is old and isolated from the atmosphere. The purpose of the second larger-diameter borehole is to demonstrate safe surface and downhole handling procedures. This paper details many of the drilling, testing, and characterization activities planned in the first smaller-diameter characterization borehole.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The Waste Form Disposal Options Evaluation Report (SNL 2014) evaluated disposal of both Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel (CSNF) and DOE-managed HLW and Spent Nuclear Fuel (DHLW and DSNF) in the variety of disposal concepts being evaluated within the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign. That work covered a comprehensive inventory and a wide range of disposal concepts. The primary goal of this work is to evaluate the information needs for analyzing disposal solely of a subset of those wastes in a Defense Repository (DRep; i.e., those wastes that are either defense related, or managed by DOE but are not commercial in origin). A potential DRep also appears to be safe in the range of geologic mined repository concepts, but may have different concepts and features because of the very different inventory of waste that would be included. The focus of this status report is to cover the progress made in FY16 toward: (1) developing a preliminary DRep included inventory for engineering/design analyses; (2) assessing the major differences of this included inventory relative to that in other analyzed repository systems and the potential impacts to disposal concepts; (3) designing and developing an on-line waste library (OWL) to manage the information of all those wastes and their waste forms (including CSNF if needed); and (4) constraining post-closure waste form degradation performance for safety assessments of a DRep. In addition, some continuing work is reported on identifying potential candidate waste types/forms to be added to the full list from SNL (2014 – see Table C-1) which also may be added to the OWL in the future. The status for each of these aspects is reported herein.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

An important issue for present and future generations is the final disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Over the past over forty years, the development of technologies to isolate both spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and other high-level nuclear waste (HLW) generated at nuclear power plants and from production of defense materials, and low- and intermediate-level nuclear waste (LILW) in underground rock and sediments has been found to be a challenging undertaking. Finding an appropriate solution for the disposal of nuclear waste is an important issue for protection of the environment and public health, and it is a prerequisite for the future of nuclear power. The purpose of a deep geological repository for nuclear waste is to provide to future generations, protection against any harmful release of radioactive material, even after the memory of the repository may have been lost, and regardless of the technical knowledge of future generations. The results of a wide variety of investigations on the development of technology for radioactive waste isolation from 19 countries were published in the First Worldwide Review in 1991 (Witherspoon, 1991). The results of investigations from 26 countries were published in the Second Worldwide Review in 1996 (Witherspoon, 1996). The results from 32 countries were summarized in the Third Worldwide Review in 2001 (Witherspoon and Bodvarsson, 2001). The last compilation had results from 24 countries assembled in the Fourth Worldwide Review (WWR) on radioactive waste isolation (Witherspoon and Bodvarsson, 2006). Since publication of the last report in 2006, radioactive waste disposal approaches have continued to evolve, and there have been major developments in a number of national geological disposal programs. Significant experience has been obtained both in preparing and reviewing cases for the operational and long-term safety of proposed and operating repositories. Disposal of radioactive waste is a complex issue, not only because of the nature of the waste, but also because of the detailed regulatory structure for dealing with radioactive waste, the variety of stakeholders involved, and (in some cases) the number of regulatory entities involved.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.