Aerospace Vehicle Random Vibration Research at Sandia National Laboratories
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Structural dynamic testing is a common method for determining if the design of a component of a system will mechanically fail when deployed into its field environment. To satisfy the test's goal, the mechanical stresses must be replicated. Structural dynamic testing is commonly executed on a shaker table or a shock apparatus such as a drop table or a resonant plate. These apparatus impart a force or load on the component through a test fixture that connects the unit under test to the apparatus. Because the test fixture is directly connected to the unit under test, the fixture modifies the structural dynamics of the system, thus varying the locations and relative levels of stress on the unit under test. This may lead to a false positive or negative indication if the unit under test will fail in its field environment depending on the environment and the test fixture. This body of research utilizes topology optimization using the Plato software to design a test fixture that attaches to the unit under test that matches the dynamic impedance of the next level of assembly. The optimization's objective function is the difference between the field configuration and the laboratory configuration's frequency response functions. It was found that this objective function had many local minima and posed difficulties in converging to an acceptable solution. A case study is presented that uses this objective function and although the results are not perfect, they are quantifiably better than the current method of using a sufficiently stiff fixture.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Microstructural variabilities are among the predominant sources of uncertainty in structural performance and reliability. We seek to develop efficient algorithms for multiscale calcu- lations for polycrystalline alloys such as aluminum alloy 6061-T6 in environments where ductile fracture is the dominant failure mode. Our approach employs concurrent multiscale methods, but does not focus on their development. They are a necessary but not sufficient ingredient to multiscale reliability predictions. We have focused on how to efficiently use concurrent models for forward propagation because practical applications cannot include fine-scale details throughout the problem domain due to exorbitant computational demand. Our approach begins with a low-fidelity prediction at the engineering scale that is sub- sequently refined with multiscale simulation. The results presented in this report focus on plasticity and damage at the meso-scale, efforts to expedite Monte Carlo simulation with mi- crostructural considerations, modeling aspects regarding geometric representation of grains and second-phase particles, and contrasting algorithms for scale coupling.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
Structural dynamics models with localized nonlinearities can be reduced using Hurty/Craig-Bampton component mode synthesis methods. The interior degrees-of-freedom of the linear subcomponents are reduced with a set of dynamic fixedinterface modes while the static constraint modes preserve the physical coordinates at which the nonlinear restoring forces are applied. For finite element models with a highly refined mesh at the boundary, a secondary modal analysis can be performed to reduce the interface down to a truncated set of local-level characteristic constraint modes. In this research, the cost savings and accuracy of the interface reduction technique are evaluated on a simple example problem involving two elastic blocks coming into contact.
Abstract not provided.
The purpose of this document is to give further details on modeling than requested in the Excel sheets To analyze the results and draw any conclusion with respect to the vibration modeling purpose.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.