Computational Capability to Study Airborne Release of Solids and Container Breach Due to Mechnical Insults
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Safety basis analysts throughout the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) complex rely heavily on the information provided in the DOE Handbook, DOE-HDBK-3010, Airborne Release Fractions/Rates and Respirable Fractions for Nonreactor Nuclear Facilities, to determine radionuclide source terms from postulated accident scenarios. In calculating source terms, analysts tend to use the DOE Handbook's bounding values on airborne release fractions (ARFs) and respirable fractions (RFs) for various categories of insults (representing potential accident release categories). This is typically due to both time constraints and the avoidance of regulatory critique. Unfortunately, these bounding ARFs/RFs represent extremely conservative values. Moreover, they were derived from very limited small-scale bench/laboratory experiments and/or from engineered judgment. Thus, the basis for the data may not be representative of the actual unique accident conditions and configurations being evaluated. The goal of this research is to develop a more accurate and defensible method to determine bounding values for the DOE Handbook using state-of-art multi-physics-based computer codes. This enables us to better understand the fundamental physics and phenomena associated with the types of accidents in the handbook. In this fourth year, we improved existing computational capabilities to better model fragmentation situations to capture small fragments during an impact accident. In addition, we have provided additional new information for various sections of Chapters 4 and 5 of the Handbook on free fall powders and impacts of solids, and have provided the damage ratio simulations for containers (7A drum and standard waste box) for various drops and impact scenarios. Thus, this work provides a low-cost method to establish physics-justified safety bounds by considering specific geometries and conditions that may not have been previously measured and/or are too costly to perform during an experiment.
This report describes the results from a series of tests of surrogate pressurized water reactor (PWR) nuclear fuel assemblies in a rail cask during various modes of transportation and cask handling conducted between June and October 2017. The primary purpose of the tests was to measure strain and acceleration on surrogate fuel rods when the assemblies are subjected to normal conditions of transport (NCT) within the Equipos Nucleares, S.A. (ENSA) UNiversal (ENUN) 32P cask. Acceleration on the cask basket, the cask, the cask cradle, and the transport platforms were also measured. A summary of the test details, logistics and operations for performing the tests is included.
This milestone presents a demonstration of an average surface mapping model that maps single-phase average wall temperatures from STAR-CCM+ to Cobra-TF using a multiplier that is linearly dependent on axial and azimuthal coordinates of the Cobra-TF mesh. The work presented herein lays the foundation for adding greater complexity to the average surface mapping model such as fluid property dependence. This average surface mapping model will be incorporated into the surface mapping model developed by Lindsay Gilkey to map fluctuations from the mean surface temperatures.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP
An ENUN 32P cask supplied by Equipos Nucleares S.A. (ENSA) was transported 9,600 miles by road, sea, and rail in 2017 in order to collect shock and vibration data on the cask system and surrogate spent fuel assemblies within the cask. The task of examining 101,857 ASCII data files – 6.002 terabytes of data (this includes binary and ASCII files) – has begun. Some results of preliminary analyses are presented in this paper. A total of seventy-seven accelerometers and strain gauges were attached by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) to three surrogate spent fuel assemblies, the cask basket, the cask body, the transport cradle, and the transport platforms. The assemblies were provided by SNL, Empresa Nacional de Residuos Radiactivos, S.A. (ENRESA), and a collaboration of Korean institutions. The cask system was first subjected to cask handling operations at the ENSA facility. The cask was then transported by heavy-haul truck in northern Spain and shipped from Spain to Belgium and subsequently to Baltimore on two roll-on/roll-off ships. From Baltimore, the cask was transported by rail using a 12- axle railcar to the American Association of Railroads’ Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) near Pueblo, Colorado where a series of special rail tests were performed. Data were continuously collected during this entire sequence of multi-modal transportation events. (We did not collect data on the transfer between modes of transportation.) Of particular interest – indeed the original motivation for these tests – are the strains measured on the zirconium-alloy tubes in the assemblies. The strains for each of the transport modes are compared to the yield strength of irradiated Zircaloy to illustrate the margin against rod failure during normal conditions of transport. The accelerometer data provides essential comparisons of the accelerations on the different components of the cask system exhibiting both amplification and attenuation of the accelerations at the transport platforms through the cradle and cask and up to the interior of the cask. These data are essential for modeling cask systems. This paper concentrates on analyses of the testing of the cask on a 12-axle railcar at TTCI.
The goal of the Verification and Validation Implementation (VVI) High to Low (Hi2Lo) process is utilizing a validated model in a high resolution code to generate synthetic data for improvement of the same model in a lower resolution code. This process is useful in circumstances where experimental data does not exist or it is not sufficient in quantity or resolution. Data from the high-fidelity code is treated as calibration data (with appropriate uncertainties and error bounds) which can be used to train parameters that affect solution accuracy in the lower-fidelity code model, thereby reducing uncertainty. This milestone presents a demonstration of the Hi2Lo process derived in the VVI focus area. The majority of the work performed herein describes the steps of the low-fidelity code used in the process with references to the work detailed in the companion high-fidelity code milestone (Reference 1). The CASL low-fidelity code used to perform this work was Cobra Thermal Fluid (CTF) and the high-fidelity code was STAR-CCM+ (STAR). The master branch version of CTF (pulled May 5, 2017 – Reference 2) was utilized for all CTF analyses performed as part of this milestone. The statistical and VVUQ components of the Hi2Lo framework were performed using Dakota version 6.6 (release date May 15, 2017 – Reference 3). Experimental data from Westinghouse Electric Company (WEC – Reference 4) was used throughout the demonstrated process to compare with the high-fidelity STAR results. A CTF parameter called Beta was chosen as the calibration parameter for this work. By default, Beta is defined as a constant mixing coefficient in CTF and is essentially a tuning parameter for mixing between subchannels. Since CTF does not have turbulence models like STAR, Beta is the parameter that performs the most similar function to the turbulence models in STAR. The purpose of the work performed in this milestone is to tune Beta to an optimal value that brings the CTF results closer to those measured in the WEC experiments.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Transactions of the American Nuclear Society
Abstract not provided.
Transactions of the American Nuclear Society
Abstract not provided.
COBRA-TF (CTF) is a low-resolution code currently maintained as CASL's subchannel analysis tool. CTF operates as a two-phase, compressible code over a mesh comprised of subchannels and axial discretized nodes. In part because CTF is a low-resolution code, simulation run time is not computationally expensive, only on the order of minutes. Hi-resolution codes such as STAR-CCM+ can be used to train lower-fidelity codes such as CTF. Unlike STAR-CCM+, CTF has no turbulence model, only a two-phase turbulent mixing coefficient, β. β can be set to a constant value or calculated in terms of Reynolds number using an empirical correlation. Results from STAR-CCM+ can be used to inform the appropriate value of β. Once β is calibrated, CTF runs can be an inexpensive alternative to costly STAR-CCM+ runs for scoping analyses. Based on the results of CTF runs, STAR-CCM+ can be run for specific parameters of interest. CASL areas of application are CIPS for single phase analysis and DNB-CTF for two-phase analysis.
Abstract not provided.
Top Fuel 2016: LWR Fuels with Enhanced Safety and Performance
COBRA-TF (CTF) is a thermal hydraulic (T/H) subchannel code using either three-dimensional (3D) Cartesian or subchannel coordinate formulations for two-phase fluid flow and heat transfer solutions. CTF has been improved under the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) program for Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) applications, including software optimization, new closure models, pre- and post-processing and parallelization for modeling full reactor core T/H responses under normal operating and accident conditions. As a result of collaboration among CASL partners including the Westinghouse Electric Company, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and the Sandia National Laboratories, additional modeling improvements were made to CTF specifically for PWR Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) analysis, including a code option to evaluate fuel thermal margin in terms of DNB Ratio (DNBR) and an axial shape factor to account for effect of non-uniform axial power distribution on DNB. Multiple DNB correlations are now linked with CTF for different applications, including the Westinghouse proprietary WRB-1 correlation for fuel designs containing mixing vane grid spacers. The improved CTF code with the WRB-1 correlation (CTF/WRB-1) was validated using the DNB data from the PWR Subchannel Bundle Tests (PSBT). In addition to the comparison with the test data, the CTF/WRB-1 DNBR results and the associated local fluid conditions were compared to the results of the Westinghouse T/H design code, VIPRE-W, which is an enhanced version of the VIPRE-01 code originally developed by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). The comparisons showed that CTF/WRB-1 DNBR predictions are in good agreement with the VIPRE-W results within the applicable range of the DNB correlation. A model sensitivity study was performed to confirm that the CTF void drift model had an insignificant effect on DNBR under the steam line break (SLB) low pressure condition.