Publications

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The physical mechanisms of energy dissipation in foam to metal interfaces must be understood in order to develop predictive models of systems with foam packaging common to many aerospace and aeronautical applications. Experimental data was obtained from hardware termed Ministack, which has large, unbonded interfaces held under compressive preload. This setup has a solid aluminum mass placed into two foam cups which are then inserted into an aluminum can and fastened with a known preload. Ministack was tested on a shaker using upward sine sweep base acceleration excitations to estimate the linearized natural frequency and energy dissipation of the first axial mode. The experimental system was disassembled and reassembled before each series of tests in order to observe the effects of the assembly to assembly variability on the dynamics. Additionally, Ministack was subjected to upward and downward sweeps to gain some understanding of the nonlinearities. Finally, Ministack was tested using a transient input, and the ring down was analyzed to find the effective stiffness and damping. There are some important findings in the measured data: there is significant assembly to assembly variability, the order in which the sine sweeps are performed influence s the dynamic response, and the system exhibits nontrivial damping and stiffness nonlinearities that must be accounted for in modeling efforts .

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Six degree of freedom (6-DOF) subsystem/component testing is becoming a desirable method, for field test data and the stress environment can be better replicated with this technology. Unfortunately, it is a rare occasion where a field test can be sufficiently instrumented such that the subsystem/component 6-DOF inputs can be directly derived. However, a recent field test of a Sandia National Laboratory system was instrumented sufficiently such that the input could be directly derived for a particular subsystem. This input is compared to methods for deriving 6-DOF test inputs from field data with limited instrumentation. There are four methods in this study used for deriving 6-DOF input with limited instrumentation. In addition to input comparisons, response measurements during the flight are compared to the predicted response of each input derivation method. All these methods with limited instrumentation suffer from the need to inverse the transmissibility function.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

The physical mechanisms of energy dissipation in foam to metal interfaces must be understood in order to develop predictive models of systems with foam packaging common to many aerospace and aeronautical applications. Experimental data was obtained from hardware termed “Ministack”, which has large, unbonded interfaces held under compressive preload. This setup has a solid aluminum mass placed into two foam cups which are then inserted into an aluminum can and fastened with a known preload. Ministack was tested on a shaker using upward sine sweep base acceleration excitations to estimate the linearized natural frequency and energy dissipation of the first axial mode. The experimental system was disassembled and reassembled before each series of tests in order to observe the effects of the assembly to assembly variability on the dynamics. There are some important findings in the measured data: there is significant assembly to assembly variability, the order in which the sine sweeps are performed influence the dynamic response, and the system exhibits nontrivial damping and stiffness nonlinearities that must be accounted for in modeling efforts. A Craig-Bampton model connected with a four-parameter Iwan element and piecewise linear springs is developed and calibrated using test data with the intention of capturing the nonlinear energy dissipation and loss of stiffness observed in experiment.

The vibration excitation mechanisms for structures in service are typically multi-directional. However, during product testing conducted in a lab setting the standard practice is to replicate these environments with three orthogonal single axis vibration tests. Recent advances in technology have made it possible to perform multi-axis simulations in the laboratory. Simultaneous multi-axis excitation can result in different stress states, rates of damage accumulation, and peak accelerations and strains than those resulting from sequential single axis testing. Accordingly, a series of experiments were run on a plate structure to investigate and quantify these differences. The experiments included single and multiple axis tests with different excitation amplitudes. The single axis tests were performed on both uniaxial and multiaxial shaker systems. The control levels, response energy, modal behavior, and peak accelerations were compared for each test condition. The data illustrates the differences between the structural response for single and multi-axis tests and enables an objective comparison between testing conducted on single and multiple axis shaker systems.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.