Publications

Hoffman, Matthew J.; Wachtel, Amanda; Gauthier, John H.; Munoz-Ramos, Karina M.; Turnley, Jessica; Nelson, April M.; Speed, Ann S.; Lawton, Craig R.; Kittinger, Robert

Abstract not provided.

Hoffman, Matthew J.; Henry, Stephen M.; Waddell, Lucas W.; Muldoon, Frank M.

Abstract not provided.

Waddell, Lucas W.; Muldoon, Frank M.; Melander, Darryl J.; Backlund, Peter B.; Henry, Stephen M.; Hoffman, Matthew J.; Nelson, April M.; Lawton, Craig R.; Rice, Roy E.

To help effectively plan the management and modernization of their large and diverse fleets of vehicles, the Program Executive Office Ground Combat Systems (PEO GCS) and the Program Executive Office Combat Support and Combat Service Support (PEO CS &CSS) commissioned the development of a large - scale portfolio planning optimization tool. This software, the Capability Portfolio Analysis Tool (CPAT), creates a detailed schedule that optimally prioritizes the modernization or replacement of vehicles within the fleet - respecting numerous business rules associated with fleet structure, budgets, industrial base, research and testing, etc., while maximizing overall fleet performance through time. This report contains a description of the organizational fleet structure and a thorough explanation of the business rules that the CPAT formulation follows involving performance, scheduling, production, and budgets. This report, which is an update to the original CPAT domain model published in 2015 (SAND2015 - 4009), covers important new CPAT features. This page intentionally left blank

Waddell, Lucas W.; Muldoon, Frank M.; Henry, Stephen M.; Hoffman, Matthew J.; Nelson, April M.; Backlund, Peter B.; Melander, Darryl J.; Lawton, Craig R.; Rice, Roy E.

In order to effectively plan the management and modernization of their large and diverse fleets of vehicles, Program Executive Office Ground Combat Systems (PEO GCS) and Program Executive Office Combat Support and Combat Service Support (PEO CS&CSS) commis- sioned the development of a large-scale portfolio planning optimization tool. This software, the Capability Portfolio Analysis Tool (CPAT), creates a detailed schedule that optimally prioritizes the modernization or replacement of vehicles within the fleet - respecting numerous business rules associated with fleet structure, budgets, industrial base, research and testing, etc., while maximizing overall fleet performance through time. This paper contains a thor- ough documentation of the terminology, parameters, variables, and constraints that comprise the fleet management mixed integer linear programming (MILP) mathematical formulation. This paper, which is an update to the original CPAT formulation document published in 2015 (SAND2015-3487), covers the formulation of important new CPAT features.

2017 12th System of Systems Engineering Conference, SoSE 2017

Turnley, Jessica; Wachtel, Amanda; Munoz-Ramos, Karina M.; Hoffman, Matthew J.; Gauthier, John H.; Speed, Ann S.; Kittinger, Robert

As system of systems (SoS) models become increasingly complex and interconnected a new approach is needed to capture the effects of humans within the SoS. Many real-life events have shown the detrimental outcomes of failing to account for humans in the loop. This research introduces a novel and cross-disciplinary methodology for modeling humans interacting with technologies to perform tasks within an SoS specifically within a layered physical security system use case. Metrics and formulations developed for this new way of looking at SoS termed sociotechnical SoS allow for the quantification of the interplay of effectiveness and efficiency seen in detection theory to measure the ability of a physical security system to detect and respond to threats. This methodology has been applied to a notional representation of a small military Forward Operating Base (FOB) as a proof-of-concept.

Turnley, Jessica; Wachtel, Amanda; Munoz-Ramos, Karina M.; Hoffman, Matthew J.; Gauthier, John H.; Speed, Ann S.; Kittinger, Robert

Abstract not provided.

Hoffman, Matthew J.

Abstract not provided.

Jones, Katherine A.; DeMenno, Mercy D.; Hoffman, Matthew J.; Pierson, Adam J.; Nozick, Linda K.; Gearhart, Jared L.; Meyer, Lozanne M.; Caskey, Susan A.; Astuto Gribble, Lisa A.; Lopez, Elizabeth L.; Arguello, Bryan A.

This report summarizes the work performed as part of a Laboratory Directed Research and Development project focused on evaluating and mitigating risk associated with biological dual use research of concern. The academic and scientific community has identified the funding stage as the appropriate place to intervene and mitigate risk, so the framework developed here uses a portfolio-level approach and balances biosafety and biosecurity risks, anticipated project benefits, and available mitigations to identify the best available investment strategies subject to cost constraints. The modeling toolkit was designed for decision analysis for dual use research of concern, but is flexible enough to support a wide variety of portfolio-level funding decisions where risk/benefit tradeoffs are involved. Two mathematical optimization models with two solution methods are included to accommodate stakeholders with varying levels of certainty about priorities between metrics. An example case study is presented.

Dessanti, Alexander D.; Gauthier, John H.; Henry, Stephen M.; Hoffman, Matthew J.

Abstract not provided.

Hoffman, Matthew J.; Walker, Michael J.; Henry, Stephen M.; Muldoon, Frank M.

Abstract not provided.

Interfaces

Davis, Scott J.; Edwards, Shatiel B.; Teper, Gerald E.; Bassett, David G.; McCarthy, Michael J.; Johnson, Scott C.; Lawton, Craig R.; Hoffman, Matthew J.; Shelton, Liliana S.; Henry, Stephen M.; Melander, Darryl J.; Muldoon, Frank M.; Alford, Brian D.; Rice, Roy E.

Recent budget reductions have posed tremendous challenges to the U.S. Army in managing its portfolio of ground combat systems (tanks and other fighting vehicles), thus placing many important programs at risk. To address these challenges, the Army and a supporting team developed and applied the Capability Portfolio Analysis Tool (CPAT) to optimally invest in ground combat modernization over the next 25-35 years. CPAT provides the Army with the analytical rigor needed to help senior Army decision makers allocate scarce modernization dollars to protect soldiers and maintain capability overmatch. CPAT delivers unparalleled insight into multiple-decade modernization planning using a novel multiphase mixed-integer linear programming technique and illustrates a cultural shift toward analytics in the Army's acquisition thinking and processes. CPAT analysis helped shape decisions to continue modernization of the $10 billion Stryker family of vehicles (originally slated for cancellation) and to strategically reallocate over $20 billion to existing modernization programs by not pursuing the Ground Combat Vehicle program as originally envisioned. More than 40 studies have been completed using CPAT, applying operations research methods to optimally prioritize billions of taxpayer dollars and allowing Army acquisition executives to base investment decisions on analytically rigorous evaluations of portfolio trade-offs.

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Wachtel, Amanda; Hoffman, Matthew J.; Lawton, Craig R.; Speed, Ann S.; Gauthier, John H.; Kittinger, Robert

System-of-systems modeling has traditionally focused on physical systems rather than humans, but recent events have proved the necessity of considering the human in the loop. As technology becomes more complex and layered security continues to increase in importance, capturing humans and their interactions with technologies within the system-of-systems will be increasingly necessary. After an extensive job-task analysis, a novel type of system-ofsystems simulation model has been created to capture the human-technology interactions on an extra-small forward operating base to better understand performance, key security drivers, and the robustness of the base. In addition to the model, an innovative framework for using detection theory to calculate d’ for individual elements of the layered security system, and for the entire security system as a whole, is under development.

Hoffman, Matthew J.; Dessanti, Alexander D.; Henry, Stephen M.; Gauthier, John H.

Abstract not provided.

Dessanti, Alexander D.; Gauthier, John H.; Henry, Stephen M.; Hoffman, Matthew J.

Abstract not provided.

Muldoon, Frank M.; Hoffman, Matthew J.; Henry, Stephen M.

Abstract not provided.

Hoffman, Matthew J.

Abstract not provided.

Muldoon, Frank M.; Henry, Stephen M.; Hoffman, Matthew J.

Abstract not provided.

Henry, Stephen M.; Muldoon, Frank M.; Hoffman, Matthew J.; Kao, Gio K.; Lawton, Craig R.; Melander, Darryl J.; Shelton, Liliana S.

In order to effectively plan the management and modernization of its large and diverse fleet of vehicles, the Program Executive Office Ground Combat Systems (PEO GCS) commissioned the development of a large-scale portfolio planning optimization tool. This software, the Capability Portfolio Analysis Tool (CPAT), creates a detailed schedule that optimally prioritizes the modernization or replacement of vehicles within the fleet - respecting numerous business rules associated with fleet structure, budgets, industrial base, research and testing, etc., while maximizing overall fleet performance through time. This paper contains a thorough documentation of the terminology, parameters, variables, and constraints that comprise the fleet management mixed integer linear programming (MILP) mathematical formulation.

Melander, Darryl J.; Henry, Stephen M.; Hoffman, Matthew J.; Kao, Gio K.; Lawton, Craig R.; Muldoon, Frank M.; Shelton, Liliana S.

To help effectively plan the management and modernization of its large and diverse fleet of vehicles, the Program Executive Office Ground Combat Systems (PEO GCS) commissioned the development of a large-scale portfolio planning optimization tool. This software, the Capability Portfolio Analysis Tool (CPAT), creates a detailed schedule that optimally prioritizes the modernization or replacement of vehicles within the fleet - respecting numerous business rules associated with fleet structure, budgets, industrial base, research and testing, etc., while maximizing overall fleet performance through time. This report contains a description of the organizational fleet structure and a thorough explanation of the business rules that the CPAT formulation follows involving performance, scheduling, production, and budgets. iii This page intentionally left blank iv

Dessanti, Alexander D.; Henry, Stephen M.; Hoffman, Matthew J.

Abstract not provided.

Dessanti, Alexander D.; Gauthier, John H.; Henry, Stephen M.; Hoffman, Matthew J.

Abstract not provided.

Hoffman, Matthew J.; Dessanti, Alexander D.; Henry, Stephen M.; Gauthier, John H.

Abstract not provided.

Hoffman, Matthew J.; Lawton, Craig R.

Abstract not provided.

Hoffman, Matthew J.

Abstract not provided.

Hoffman, Matthew J.; Gauthier, John H.; Pankretz, Geoffry S.; Henry, Stephen M.

Abstract not provided.