A new apparatus – “Dropkinson Bar” – has been successfully developed for material property characterization at intermediate strain rates. This Dropkinson bar combines a drop table and a Hopkinson bar. The drop table was used to generate a relatively long and stable low-speed impact to the specimen, whereas the Hopkinson bar principle was applied to measure the load history with accounting for inertia effect in the system. Pulse shaping technique was also applied to the Dropkinson bar to facilitate uniform stress and strain as well as constant strain rate in the specimen. The Dropkinson bar was then used to characterize 304L stainless steel and 6061-T6 aluminum at a strain rate of ∼600 s−1. The experimental data obtained from the Dropkinson bar tests were compared with the data obtained from conventional Kolsky tensile bar tests of the same material at similar strain rates. Both sets of experimental results were consistent, showing the newly developed Dropkinson bar apparatus is reliable and repeatable.
A new apparatus-"Dropkinson Bar"-has been successfully developed for material property characterization at intermediate strain rates. This Dropkinson bar combines a drop table and a Hopkinson bar. The drop table is used to generate a relatively long and stable low-speed impact to the tensile specimen, whereas the Hopkinson bar principle is applied to measure the load history with accounting for inertia effects in the system. In addition, pulse shaping techniques were applied to the Dropkinson bar to facilitate uniform stress and strain as well as constant strain rate in the specimen. The Dropkinson bar was used to characterize 304L stainless steel and 6061-T6 aluminum at a strain rate of ~600 s-1. The experimental data obtained from the Dropkinson bar tests were compared with the data obtained from conventional Kolsky tensile bar tests of the same material at similar strain rates. Both sets of experimental results were consistent, showing the newly developed Dropkinson bar apparatus is reliable and repeatable.
This study details a complimentary testing and finite element analysis effort to model threaded fasteners subjected to multiple loadings and loading rates while identifying modeling sensitivities that impact this process. NAS1352-06-6P fasteners were tested in tension at quasistatic loading rates and tension and shear at dynamic loading rates. The quasistatic tension tests provided calibration and validation data for constitutive model fitting, but this process was complicated by the difference in the conventional (global) and novel (local) displacement measurements. The consequences of these differences are investigated in detail by obtaining calibrated models from both displacement measurements and assessing their performance when extended to the dynamic tension and shear applications. Common quantities of interest are explored, including failure load, time-to-failure, and displacement-at-failure. Finally, the mesh sensitivities of both dynamic analysis models are investigated to assess robustness and inform modeling fidelity. This study is performed in the context of applying these fastener models into large-scale, full system finite element analyses of complex structures, and therefore the models chosen are relatively basic to accommodate this desire and reflect typical modeling approaches. The quasistatic tension results reveal the sensitivity and importance of displacement measurement techniques in the testing procedure, especially when performing experiments involving multiple components that inhibit local specimen measurements. Additional compliance from test fixturing and load frames have an increasingly significant effect on displacement data as the measurement becomes more global, and models must necessarily capture these effects to accurately reproduce the test data. Analysis difficulties were also discovered in the modeling of shear loadings, as the results were very sensitive to mesh discretization, further complicating the ability to analyze joints subjected to diverse loadings. These variables can significantly contribute to the error and uncertainty associated with the model, and this study begins to quantify this behavior and provide guidance on mitigating these effects. When attempting to capture multiple loadings and loading rates in fasteners through simulation, it becomes necessary to thoroughly exercise and explore test and analysis procedures to ensure the final model is appropriate for the desired application.
A series of tests on NAS1352-06-6P threaded fasteners were coupled with analysis to fit constitutive models, evaluate multiple modeling approaches, and ultimately predict failure. Experiments loading the fasteners in tension at both quasistatic and dynamic loading rates were performed to obtain calibration and validation data for the analysis. The fastener was modeled with two low-fidelity approaches - a "plug" of hex elements retaining the nominal fastener geometry (without threads) and a "spot weld", which incorporates similar geometry but the fastener is sliced near its mid-plane to define a tensile loaddisplacement relationship between the two exposed surfaces - to accommodate the use of these modeling methods in a larger, more detailed finite element analysis. Both modeling approaches were calibrated using quasistatic test data and then extended to the dynamic analyses to compare with the analogous test results. The analysis accurately reproduces most acceleration time-histories observed in the dynamic testing but under predicts failure, indicating the possible presence of strain rate effects that have been neglected in the constitutive models.