Publications

Results 1–25 of 28
Skip to search filters

The Fingerprints of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection in E3SM

Wagman, Benjamin M.; Swiler, Laura P.; Chowdhary, Kamaljit S.; Hillman, Benjamin H.

The June 15, 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption is simulated in E3SM by injecting 10 Tg of SO2 gas in the stratosphere, turning off prescribed volcanic aerosols, and enabling E3SM to treat stratospheric volcanic aerosols prognostically. This experimental prognostic treatment of volcanic aerosols in the stratosphere results in some realistic behaviors (SO2 evolves into H2SO4 which heats the lower stratosphere), and some expected biases (H2SO4 aerosols sediment out of the stratosphere too quickly). Climate fingerprinting techniques are used to establish a Mt. Pinatubo fingerprint based on the vertical profile of temperature from the E3SMv1 DECK ensemble. By projecting reanalysis data and preindustrial simulations onto the fingerprint, the Mt. Pinatubo stratospheric heating anomaly is detected. Projecting the experimental prognostic aerosol simulation onto the fingerprint also results in a detectable heating anomaly, but, as expected, the duration is too short relative to reanalysis data.

More Details

SCREAM: a performance-portable global cloud-resolving model based on the Energy Exascale Earth System Model

Hillman, Benjamin H.; Caldwell, Peter C.; Salinger, Andrew G.; Bertagna, Luca B.; Beydoun, Hassan B.; Peter, Bogenschutz.P.; Bradley, Andrew M.; Donahue, Aaron D.; Eldred, Christopher; Foucar, James G.; Golaz, Chris G.; Guba, Oksana G.; Jacob, Robert J.; Johnson, Jeff J.; Keen, Noel K.; Krishna, Jayesh K.; Lin, Wuyin L.; Liu, Weiran L.; Pressel, Kyle P.; Singh, Balwinder S.; Steyer, Andrew S.; Taylor, Mark A.; Terai, Chris T.; Ullrich, Paul A.; Wu, Danqing W.; Yuan, Xingqui Y.

Abstract not provided.

Sensitivities of Simulated Satellite Views of Clouds to Subgrid-Scale Overlap and Condensate Heterogeneity

Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Hillman, Benjamin H.; Marchand, R.T.; Ackerman, T.P.

Satellite simulators are often used to account for limitations in satellite retrievals of cloud properties in comparisons between models and satellite observations. The purpose of this framework is to enable more robust evaluation of model cloud properties, so that differences between models and observations can more confidently be attributed to model errors. A critical step in this process is accounting for the difference between the spatial scales at which cloud properties are retrieved with those at which clouds are simulated in global models. In this study, we create a series of sensitivity tests using 4-km global model output from the multiscale modeling framework to evaluate the sensitivity of simulated satellite retrievals to common assumptions about cloud and precipitation overlap and condensate variability used in climate models whose grid spacing is many tens to hundreds of kilometers. We find the simulated retrievals are sensitive to these assumptions. Using maximum-random overlap with homogeneous cloud and precipitation condensate leads to errors in Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer and International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project-simulated cloud cover and in CloudSat-simulated radar reflectivity that are significant compared to typical differences between the model simulations and observations. A more realistic treatment of unresolved clouds and precipitation is shown to substantially reduce these errors. The sensitivity to these assumptions underscores the need for the adoption of more realistic subcolumn treatments in models and the need for consistency among subcolumn assumptions between models and simulators to ensure that simulator-diagnosed errors are consistent with the model formulation.

More Details
Results 1–25 of 28
Results 1–25 of 28