Publications

Power API - the result of collaboration among national laboratories, universities, and major vendors - provides a range of standardized power management functions, from application-level control and measurement to facility-level accounting, including real-time and historical statistics gathering. Support is already available for Intel and AMD CPUs and standalone measurement devices.

Practical considerations for future supercomputer designs will impose limits on both instantaneous power consumption and total energy consumption. Working within these constraints while providing the maximum possible performance, application developers will need to optimize their code for speed alongside power and energy concerns. This paper analyzes the effectiveness of several code optimizations including loop fusion, data structure transformations, and global allocations. A per component measurement and analysis of different architectures is performed, enabling the examination of code optimizations on different compute subsystems. Using an explicit hydrodynamics proxy application from the U.S. Department of Energy, LULESH, we show how code optimizations impact different computational phases of the simulation. This provides insight for simulation developers into the best optimizations to use during particular simulation compute phases when optimizing code for future supercomputing platforms. We examine and contrast both x86 and Blue Gene architectures with respect to these optimizations.

MPI includes all processes in MPI COMM WORLD; this is untenable for reasons of scale, resiliency, and overhead. This paper offers a new approach, extending MPI with a new concept called Sessions, which makes two key contributions: a tighter integration with the underlying runtime system; and a scalable route to communication groups. This is a fundamental change in how we organise and address MPI processes that removes well-known scalability barriers by no longer requiring the global communicator MPI COMM - WORLD.

Abstract not provided.

Power will be a first-class operating constraint for Exascale computing. In order to manage power consumption of systems, measurement and control methods need to be developed. While several approaches have been developed by hardware manufacturers, they are vendor-specific and in some cases implementation-specific interfaces. Integrating all of the individual device level measurement and control functionality in a single system is a difficult task that requires system specific code. Sandia National Laboratories, in collaboration with many industry and academic partners, has developed a Power API specification, consisting of a broad range of interfaces spanning from low-level hardware to platform management and accounting. In order for many of the interfaces to be useful, especially at large scale, measurement data must be collected and control directives must be distributed in a scalable manner. This paper details the challenges of providing large scale power measurement and control and the scalable collection and control distribution architecture that is being integrated into the Power API reference implementation.

Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) is expected to be an integral communication mechanism for future exascale systems - enabling asynchronous data transfers, so that applications may fully utilize all CPU resources while simultaneously sharing data amongst remote nodes. We examined this network-induced memory contention (NiMC), the interactions between RDMA and the memory subsystem when applications and out-of-band services compete for memory resources, and NiMC's resulting impact on application-level performance. For a range of hardware technologies and HPC workloads, we quantified NiMC and show that NiMC's impact grows with scale resulting in up to 3X performance degradation at scales as small as 8K processes even in applications that previously have been shown to be performance resilient in the presence of noise. We also evaluated three potential techniques to reduce NiMC's performance impact, namely hardware offloading, core reservation and software-based network throttling. While all three of these solutions show promise, we provide guidelines that help select the best solution for a given environment.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Measuring and controlling the power and energy consumption of high performance computing systems by various components in the software stack is an active research area [13, 3, 5, 10, 4, 21, 19, 16, 7, 17, 20, 18, 11, 1, 6, 14, 12]. Implementations in lower level software layers are beginning to emerge in some production systems, which is very welcome. To be most effective, a portable interface to measurement and control features would significantly facilitate participation by all levels of the software stack. We present a proposal for a standard power Application Programming Interface (API) that endeavors to cover the entire software space, from generic hardware interfaces to the input from the computer facility manager.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Abstract not provided.

Future exascale systems are under increased pressure to find power savings. The network, while it consumes a considerable amount of power is often left out of the picture when discussing total system power. Even when network power is being considered, the references are frequently a decade or older and rely on models that lack validation on modern inter- connects. In this work we explore how dynamic mechanisms of an Infiniband network save power and at what granularity we can engage these features. We explore this within the context of the host controller adapter (HCA) on the node and for the fabric, i.e. switches, using three different mechanisms of dynamic link width, frequency and disabling of links for QLogic and Mellanox systems. Our results show that while there is some potential for modest power savings, real world systems need to improved responsiveness to adjustments in order to fully leverage these savings. This page intentionally left blank.

Abstract not provided.