Sandia LabNews

Dragonflies and microvalves make mark at annual MEMS design contest


The Carnegie Mellon student design (top image) for a MEMS-based, electrostatically operated microvalve won in the educational category. (Image courtesy of Carnegie Mellon University)
Texas Tech students won in the novel design category for their MEMS-based dragonfly design (lower image). (Image courtesy of Texas Tech University) To open a larger file, click the image.

A dragonfly as small as a piece of dust, its four tiny wings beating like it had settled momentarily on a lily pad, and an unusually sensitive microvalve were the big winners in this year’s design contest for extraordinarily tiny devices held annually at Sandia.

The winners — Texas Tech University for the novel insect and Carnegie Mellon University for the educational valve — were announced in late May at Sandia at an awards ceremony. There, student researchers presented their microelectromechanical system (MEMS) designs to the scrutiny of Sandia engineers.

Sandia will fabricate all students’ design submissions using its advanced SUMMiT V™ fabrication process, which makes MEMS devices with five levels of polysilicon (the most of any standard process), and is especially well-suited for making the complex mechanisms thought up by student contestants. Other institutions competing this year included the universities of Oklahoma and Utah, and the Air Force Institute of Technology. Students representing each submission presented their designs at the awards ceremony.

New design possibilities

The dragonfly opens new possibilities in the design of aerial surveillance devices. These currently have many uses, from quantifying the radiation leaking from damaged Japanese nuclear reactors to delineating enemy positions. Current state -of-the-art micro air machines have components in the centimeter range (from 15 cm to slightly less than 1 cm). The insect-inspired device is smaller, with biologically mimetic wings approximately 0.5 millimeters long and 0.1 mm wide. It is intended to generate aerodynamic lift and thrust by flapping its wings rather than by a motor-driven propeller or jet thrust. Flapping is achieved when small intermittent electric currents cause thermal expansion and contraction in the wings. Clever engineering uses this material’s response to make the wing strokes more aerodynamic and hence more efficient.

“Among the countless insect species able to fly, we chose the dragonfly because it flaps its wings in the vertical direction, rather than back-and-forth or in a rotary motion,” said Texas Tech student Sahil Oak. “The vertical motion of the large wings in our design not only provide greater surface area for lift than most flying insects but cool faster, enabling faster flapping.”

The work was supervised by TTU faculty advisor Tim Dallas.

Valves are the largely underappreciated method by which advanced technical societies control the flow of fluids. Commonly, their motions are screw-based like a shower stall, water sink, or garden hose bib, or they are switch-based, using ball-and-flapper valves like most toilets, heart valve prostheses, and inkjet printers. The winning project from Carnegie Mellon involved a micro switch-based valve that makes possible very fine control over tiny amounts of liquid flow. This valve requires only picoJoules of energy to switch its state. The test module the students designed will help determine characteristics that would create the most efficient and lowest leakage microvalves, and ultimately may help facilitate tiny flow-through experiments. These are increasingly common in biological research laboratories and in medical facilities attempting rapid analysis of a patient’s medical state from tiny fluid samples.

“One of the most common types of microvalves is electrostatically operated, which is the model for our design,” says Carnegie Mellon student research lead Vitali Brand. “The best microvalves are useful in certain fuel cell designs and in microengines because they can close or open in less than one-thousandth of a second and function against heavy pressures without leaking.”

CMU professorial oversight was provided by Maarten de Boer.

The student contest, open to institutional members of the Sandia-led MEMS University Alliance program, provides an arena for the nation’s student engineers to hone their skills in designing and using microdevices. Such devices are used to probe biological cells, arrange and operate components of telecommunications and high-tech machinery, operate many home devices, and strengthen national security.

Process takes months

The MEMS University Alliance is part of Sandia’s outreach to universities to improve engineering education. It is open to any US institution of higher learning, and most recently has extended an invitation to select Mexican universities to help that country develop its technological base.

The alliance provides classroom teaching materials and licenses for Sandia’s special SUMMiT V design tools at a reasonable cost. This makes it possible for a university without its own fabrication facilities to develop a curriculum in MEMS. The design competition is an increasing activity within the University Alliance, which now has more than 20 members.

The entire contest process takes almost nine months. It starts with students developing ideas for a device, followed by creation of an accurate computer model of a design that might work, analysis of the design and, finally, design submission. Sandia’s MEMS experts and university professors review the design and determine the winners.

Sandia’s state-of-the-art MESA fabrication facility then creates parts for each of the entrants. The design competition capitalizes on Sandia’s confidence in achieving first-pass fabrication success, which restricts the entire process to a reasonable student timeframe.

Fabricated parts are shipped back to the university students for lengthy tests to determine whether the final product matches the purpose of the original computer simulation.

The University Alliance coordinates with the Sandia-led National Institute for Nano Engineering (NINE), providing additional opportunities for students to self-direct their engineering education, and the Sandia/Los Alamos Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (CINT), a DOE Office of Science center with the most up-to-date nanotechnology tools.

Travel by 26 students and five professors to the awards ceremony was made possible by grants from SPIE.

The Sandia student presentations were hosted by Tom Zipperian (1740), group manager of MESA microfabrication, and Keith Ortiz, manager of MEMS Technologies (1749).

For more information regarding the University Alliance and the design competition, contact Stephanie Johnson at srjohns@sandia.gov. Images and white papers describing the winning designs can be found on the web at http://mems.sandia.govua/contest.html.