An automobile engine that fired one cylinder and then waited hours before firing again wouldn’t take a car very far.
Similarly, a machine to provide humanity unlimited electrical energy from cheap, abundant seawater can’t fire once and quit for the day. It must deliver energy to fuse pellets of hydrogen every 10 seconds and keep up that pace for millions of shots between maintenance — a kind of an internal combustion engine for nuclear fusion. That’s so, at least, for the fusion method at Sandia’s Z machine and elsewhere known as inertial confinement.
But, unable to produce fusion except episodically, the method has been overshadowed by the technique called magnetic confinement — a method that uses a magnetic field to confine a continuous fusion reaction from which to draw power.
Now an electrical circuit emerging from the technological hills may change the balance between these systems. Tagged as “revolutionary” by ordinarily conservative researchers, it may close the gap between the two methods.
The circuit is easily able to fire every 10.2 seconds in brief, powerful bursts.
Arranged modularly, a collection of these circuits could deliver enough power to cause high-yield fusion releases — that is, more power emitted than inserted — from hydrogen pellet targets every few seconds, a basic requirement for a nuclear fusion-fueled electrical generating plant.
The system, called a linear transformer driver (LTD), was created by researchers at the Institute of High Current Electronics in Tomsk, Russia, in collaboration with colleagues at Sandia.
“This is the most significant advance in primary power generation since the invention of the Marx generator, my staff and I believe,” says Keith Matzen, director of Pulsed Power Center 1600. Marx generators are giant capacitors used to store and discharge Z’s 20 million amps of electrical current. They were invented in 1924.
The cherry-lifesaver path to fusion
The circuit — a switch tightly coupled to two capacitors — is about the size of a shoebox and is termed a “brick.” When bricks are tightly packed in groups of 20 and electrically connected in parallel in a circular container resembling a large cherry lifesaver, the aggregate, or “cavity” as the physicists would have it, can transmit a current of 0.5 megamperes at 100 kilovolts.
A test cavity has fired in Sandia’s Tech Area 4 without flaw more than 11,000 times.
Because the cavities are modular, they can be stacked like donuts on a metal prong called a stalk. Arranged in a suitable configuration, they could generate 60 megamperes and six megavolts of electrical power, enough (theoretically) to generate high-yield nuclear fusion within the parameters necessary to run an electrical power plant.
“This is a revolutionary advance,” says Craig Olson (1640), senior scientist and manager of the pulsed power inertial fusion energy program.
The next-generation cavity model, now being tested in Tomsk, transmits 1.0 megamperes at the same voltage and with the same rapidity. Five such units have been built; four have been purchased by Sandia and one by the University of Michigan. The units cost $160,000 each. They too, according to Sandia scientist and project leader Mike Mazarakis (1671), who supervised the tests at the Siberian site, are performing without flaw.
Says Rick Stulen (1000), Sandia VP for Science, Technology, and Research Foundations, “This new technology not only represents a remarkable technical advance but also demonstrates the strong engagement of Sandia’s scientists and engineers in the international community.”
“This is an amazing achievement,” says VP Gerry Yonas, a former leader at Z and of the Labs’ Advanced Concepts Group.
Happily for Sandia accountants but sadly to those who love the widely distributed arcs-and-sparks photo of Z firing by Sandia photographer Randy Montoya (3651), the new switch eliminates the need for the hundreds of thousands of gallons of insulating water and oil carried by the present Z structure. It was over the surface of that water that the electrical arcing of Z became a phenomenon as much appreciated by graphic artists as it was loathed by engineers (who saw it as wasted energy). Also gone will be much of Z’s intricate switching. All were needed to shorten to nanoseconds the microsecond pulse produced by Marx generators.
Advantages of the new technology
The linear transformer driver produces its 100-nanosecond pulse from the get-go. It works so well because its design lowers inductances that ordinarily slow electrical transmission.
It does this in part by eliminating the huge plates and extensive wiring in the current Z machine, all of which generate magnetic fields. In the new system, each brick has almost no wiring. Two capacitors about the size of small thermos bottles are tightly linked to a switch the size of a lunchbox. There is little opportunity to generate magnetic fields that slow the passage of current.
Further, linking the bricks in parallel in a cavity not only adds currents, but decreases inductances to levels significantly less than that of Marx generators.
The subsets are then linked in series to add voltage.
This allows a very powerful machine to fire very rapidly, with only a thin layer of oil bathing the rings and rows of switches.
The LTD technology is 50 percent more efficient than current Z machine firings, in terms of the ratio of useful energy out to energy in. Z is currently 15 percent efficient to its load (already a very high efficiency among possible fusion machines).
There is, however, a small matter of cost.
Funding for Z historically has been for defense purposes: Its experiments are used to generate data for simulations on supercomputers that help maintain the strength, effectiveness, and safety of the US nuclear deterrent. Even without its rapid repetition capability, a powerful LTD machine would better simulate conditions created by nuclear weapons, so that data from the laboratory-created explosion of Z firing could be used with greater certainty in computer simulations regarding nuclear weapons. The US has refrained from actual testing of nuclear weapons for 15 years.
But fired repeatedly, the machine could well be the fusion machine that could form the basis of an electrical generating plant only two decades away. Progress in this arena might eventually require funding from DOE’s energy arm.
million and five years
To confirm the new Z concept would take $35 million over five to seven years to build a test bed with 100 cavities.
Funding thus far has come from two US congressional initiatives through DOE-NNSA Defense Programs, Sandia’s internal Laboratory Directed Research and Development monies, and Sandia’s Inertial Confinement Fusion program.
“It’s like building a tinker toy,” says Keith. “We think we need 60 megamperes to make large fusion yields. But though our simulations show it can be done, we won’t know for certain until we actually build it.”
The device was designed by Tomsk pulsed-power head Alexander Kim with the switch developed by Boris Kovalchuk. Its speed-up from a microsecond to 100 nanosecond firing was urged by Sandia manager Dillon McDaniel (1650), and encouraged by Sandia managers Rick Spielman (1676) and Ken Struve (1671). The work was led at Sandia and Tomsk by Sandia researcher Mike Mazarakis (1671). Testing at Sandia was by Bill Fowler (1671) and Robin Sharpe (1676). The Z-IFE fusion energy program at Sandia was initiated and is managed by Craig Olson (1640).
Sandia has filed a patent application on a high-power pulsed-power accelerator invented by William Stygar (1671) that can use an LTD as the primary power generator to replace the conventional Marx generator.
Recent results on LTD development will be presented at the IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference and the IEEE Symposium on Fusion Engineering to be held in Albuquerque in June.