As the size and complexity of high performance computing (HPC) systems grow in line with advancements in hardware and software technology, HPC systems increasingly suffer from performance variations due to shared resource contention as well as software-and hardware-related problems. Such performance variations can lead to failures and inefficiencies, which impact the cost and resilience of HPC systems. To minimize the impact of performance variations, one must quickly and accurately detect and diagnose the anomalies that cause the variations and take mitigating actions. However, it is difficult to identify anomalies based on the voluminous, high-dimensional, and noisy data collected by system monitoring infrastructures. This paper presents a novel machine learning based framework to automatically diagnose performance anomalies at runtime. Our framework leverages historical resource usage data to extract signatures of previously-observed anomalies. We first convert collected time series data into easy-to-compute statistical features. We then identify the features that are required to detect anomalies, and extract the signatures of these anomalies. At runtime, we use these signatures to diagnose anomalies with negligible overhead. We evaluate our framework using experiments on a real-world HPC supercomputer and demonstrate that our approach successfully identifies 98 percent of injected anomalies and consistently outperforms existing anomaly diagnosis techniques.
The dragonfly network topology has attracted attention in recent years owing to its high radix and constant diameter. However, the influence of job allocation on communication time in dragonfly networks is not fully understood. Recent studies have shown that random allocation is better at balancing the network traffic, while compact allocation is better at harnessing the locality in dragonfly groups. Based on these observations, this paper introduces a novel allocation policy called Level-Spread for dragonfly networks. This policy spreads jobs within the smallest network level that a given job can fit in at the time of its allocation. In this way, it simultaneously harnesses node adjacency and balances link congestion. To evaluate the performance of Level-Spread, we run packet-level network simulations using a diverse set of application communication patterns, job sizes, and communication intensities. We also explore the impact of network properties such as the number of groups, number of routers per group, machine utilization level, and global link bandwidth. Level-Spread reduces the communication overhead by 16% on average (and up to 71%) compared to the state-of-The-Art allocation policies.