Historically, photovoltaic inverters have been grid-following controlled, but with increasing penetrations of inverter-based generation on the grid, grid-forming inverters (GFMI) are gaining interest. GFMIs can also be used in microgrids that require the ability to interact and operate with the grid (grid-tied), or to operate autonomously (islanded) while supplying their corresponding loads. This approach can substantially improve the response of the grid to severe contingencies such as hurricanes, or to high load demands. During islanded conditions, GFMIs play an important role on dictating the system's voltage and frequency the same way as synchronous generators do in large interconnected systems. For this reason, it is important to understand the behavior of such grid-forming inverters under fault scenarios. This paper focuses on testing different commercially available grid-forming inverters under fault conditions.
Power outages are a challenge that utility companies must face, with the potential to affect millions of customers and cost billions in damage. For this reason, there is a need for developing approaches that help understand the effects of fault conditions on the power grid. In distribution circuits with high renewable penetrations, the fault currents from DER equipment can impact coordinated protection scheme implementations so it is critical to accurately analyze fault contributions from DER systems. To do this, MATLAB/Simulink/RT-Labs was used to simulate the reduced-order distribution system and three different faults are applied at three different bus locations in the distribution system. The use of Real-Time (RT) Power Hardware-in-the-Loop (PHIL) simulations was also used to further improve the fidelity of the model. A comparison between OpenDSS simulation results and the Opal-RT experimental fault currents was conducted to determine the steady-state and dynamic accuracy of each method as well as the response of using simulated and hardware PV inverters. It was found that all methods were closely correlated in steady-state, but the transient response of the inverter was difficult to capture with a PV model and the physical device behavior could not be represented completely without incorporating it through PHIL.
Power outages are a challenge that utility companies must face, with the potential to affect millions of customers and cost billions in damage. For this reason, there is a need for developing approaches that help understand the effects of fault conditions on the power grid. In distribution circuits with high renewable penetrations, the fault currents from DER equipment can impact coordinated protection scheme implementations so it is critical to accurately analyze fault contributions from DER systems. To do this, MATLAB/Simulink/RT-Labs was used to simulate the reduced-order distribution system and three different faults are applied at three different bus locations in the distribution system. The use of Real-Time (RT) Power Hardware-in-the-Loop (PHIL) simulations was also used to further improve the fidelity of the model. A comparison between OpenDSS simulation results and the Opal-RT experimental fault currents was conducted to determine the steady-state and dynamic accuracy of each method as well as the response of using simulated and hardware PV inverters. It was found that all methods were closely correlated in steady-state, but the transient response of the inverter was difficult to capture with a PV model and the physical device behavior could not be represented completely without incorporating it through PHIL.
The Ideal Transformer Method (ITM) and the Damping Impedance Method (DIM) are the most widely used techniques for connecting power equipment to a Power-Hardware-in-the-Loop (PHIL) real-time simulation. Both methods have been studied for their stability and accuracy in PHIL simulations, but neither have been analyzed when the hardware is providing grid-support services with volt-var, frequency-watt, and fixed power factor functions. In this work, we experimentally validate the two methods of connecting a physical PV inverter to a PHIL system and evaluate them for dynamic stability and accuracy when operating with grid-support functions. It was found that the DIM Low Pass Lead Filter (LPF LD) method was the best under unity and negative power factor conditions, but the ITM LPF LD method was preferred under positive power factor conditions.
The Ideal Transformer Method (ITM) and the Damping Impedance Method (DIM) are the most widely used techniques for connecting power equipment to a Power-Hardware-in-the-Loop (PHIL) real-time simulation. Both methods have been studied for their stability and accuracy in PHIL simulations, but neither have been analyzed when the hardware is providing grid-support services with volt-var, frequency-watt, and fixed power factor functions. In this work, we experimentally validate the two methods of connecting a physical PV inverter to a PHIL system and evaluate them for dynamic stability and accuracy when operating with grid-support functions. It was found that the DIM Low Pass Lead Filter (LPF LD) method was the best under unity and negative power factor conditions, but the ITM LPF LD method was preferred under positive power factor conditions.
In this report we focus on analyzing current-controlled PV inverters behaviour under faults in order to develop fault detection schemes for microgrids with high PV penetration. Inverter model suitable for steady state fault studies is presented and the impact of PV inverters on two protection elements is analyzed. The studied protection elements are superimposed quantities based directional element and negative sequence directional element. Additionally, several non-overcurrent fault detection schemes are discussed in this report for microgrids with high PV penetration. A detailed time-domain simulation study is presented to assess the performance of the presented fault detection schemes under different microgrid modes of operation.